Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 8(1): 9-12, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10607493

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Alternative medicine is used extensively by patients with chronic pain due to e.g., osteoarthritis. Only few of these drugs have be tested in a controlled setting and the present study was undertaken to examine the effect of ginger extract, one of the most popular herbal medications. DESIGN: Ginger extract was compared to placebo and Ibuprofen in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee in a controlled, double blind, double dummy, cross-over study with a wash-out period of one week followed by three treatment periods in a randomized sequence, each of three weeks duration. Acetaminophen was used as rescue medication throughout the study. The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (European Guideline for GCP). RESULTS: A ranking of efficacy of the three treatment periods: Ibuprofen>ginger extract>placebo was found for visual analogue scale of pain (Friedman test: 24.65, P< 0.00001) and the Lequesne-index (Friedman test: 20.76, P< 0.00005). In the cross-over study, no significant difference between placebo and ginger extract could be demonstrated (Siegel-Castellan test), while explorative tests of differences in the first treatment period showed a better effect of both Ibuprofen and ginger extract than placebo (Chi-square, P< 0.05). There were no serious adverse events reported during the periods with active medications. CONCLUSION: In the present study a statistically significant effect of ginger extract could only be demonstrated by explorative statistical methods in the first period of treatment before cross-over, while a significant difference was not observed in the study as a whole.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Phytotherapy , Plants, Medicinal , Zingiber officinale/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm ; 12(2): 31-6, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1364936

ABSTRACT

The aim of this 8 week study, was to compare the tolerability and efficacy of enteric-coated (ECT) and plain naproxen tablets (PT). Ninety eight patients (mean age 66 years) with osteoarthritis were included in a randomized, multi-centre, double-blind, cross-over study. Response variables were monitored at 2 week intervals for the duration of the study. Sixteen patients withdrew from the study, eight because of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (ECT 5, PT3). There was no significant difference in patients preference. Eighteen patients reported GI adverse events only on PT compared to 9 on ECT (n.s.). In the first treatment period the severity of adverse events was significantly less on ECT (P = 0.015). Both enteric-coated and plain naproxen tablets were effective and well tolerated. In conclusion, the study did not show any clinical significant difference in tolerability or efficacy between the formulations in osteoarthritis of the knee and/or the hip, although some of the variables did show statistical significant difference or tendency in favour of the enteric coated tablets.


Subject(s)
Naproxen/administration & dosage , Naproxen/adverse effects , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Tablets , Tablets, Enteric-Coated
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...