Telemedicine Utilization in the COVID-19 Era: Patterns of Care in Community Urology Practice.

INTRODUCTION: The acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted ambulatory care in the US, and in response telemedicine was adopted rapidly but unevenly across specialties and time. This study examines the utilization of telemedicine in the specialty of urology across a 3-year period (before, during, and after the onset of the pandemic) with the objective of describing patterns, costs, and trends in telemedicine utilization in the specialty. METHODS: The study data were drawn from the adjudicated claims of 1726 providers in 41 independent (privately owned) practices across the US from March 2019 to February 2022. Encounters were indexed to providers to allow for comparisons of utilization across time. Telehealth adoption was defined as the percentage of encounters eligible for reimbursement by telehealth actually conducted by telehealth. RESULTS: A total of 3,630,474 individual patients and 16,130,444 unique encounters were included in our analysis. Telehealth-eligible (evaluation and management) encounters declined sharply from a prepandemic baseline of 262 per provider per month (pppm) to a nadir of 164 pppm in April 2020 (acute phase), but quickly rebounded to 264 pppm by June 2020 (postacute phase). Telehealth adoption among urology providers in this study was 0% prior to March 2020, peaked at 46% in April 2020, and then declined rapidly in the months afterward. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth adoption in urology spiked abruptly during the acute phase of the pandemic before declining to a low but stable level above prepandemic baseline. These findings may have implications for the broader role of telemedicine in the delivery of urologic care.

Testosterone therapy in prostate cancer: is it still a controversy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The benefits of testosterone therapy (TTh) in the hypogonadal male can be dramatic. Historically, TTh has been contraindicated in prostate cancer (PCa). Current evidence has redefined our understanding of the influence serum testosterone has on prostatic androgen activity. Increasing numbers of hypogonadal men with coexisting PCa emphasizes the importance of describing those who may safely receive TTh. This review aims to present literature that evaluates the efficacy and safety of TTh in men with coexisting PCa. RECENT FINDINGS: Our study, a comprehensive review of published literature regarding TTh in men with a history of PCa, consisted of studies conducted from the 1940s to 2022. Our review discusses evidence in accordance with previous studies that TTh has a role in patients with localized PCa as it has not been reported to increase rates of recurrence or progression of PCa. SUMMARY: The use of TTh in hypongonadal men with a localized PCa has been shown to have positive clinical outcomes without increasing the rate of disease progression or recurrence. Further research, in a randomized controlled setting, is warranted.