GnRH receptor and androgen receptor status and outcome of advanced prostate carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: The effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs on prostate carcinoma is partly a result of breaking the pituitary-gonadal axis, and partly the direct action on tumor cells expressing the GnRH receptor (GnRHR). The aim of this study was to detect the extent of correlation between the expression of GnRHR and also the androgen receptor (AR) and the efficacy of total androgen blockade (TAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Needle biopsy samples of twenty advanced prostate carcinoma patients were investigated histologically regarding Gleason score, AR and GnRHR status of the tumor cells. An affinity purified polyclonal antibody reacting with GnRHR and a monoclonal antibody for AR were applied for immunoperoxidase reactions. TAB was started in each case. Pathological, radiological and laboratory-prostate-specific antigen (PSA) data obtained before the start of TAB and survival, PSA values, and radiological findings after three years of TAB were related to AR and GnRHR. RESULTS: Regarding the clinical, radiological and laboratory findings before and after three years of TAB, 13 patients (group A) were considered to show a favourable' and 7 (group B) to show a 'poor' outcome. Twelve patients out of 14 with AR-positive tumor cells and all nine patients with GnRHR-positive tumor cells, as well as all eight patients with both AR- and GnRHR-positive tumor cells belonged to group A. The majority of AR-negative, GnRHR-negative or both AR- and GnRHR-negative cases belonged to group B. CONCLUSION: The presence of GnRHR and AR or both of these receptors indicates a more favourable outcome of advanced prostate carcinoma when treated with TAB, compared to GnRHR- and AR-negative cases. GnRHR and AR negativity may indicate a need for supplementary chemo- or radiotherapy.

[The role of repeated biopsies in prognosis of prostate cancer]. / Prostatadaganat prognózisának vizsgálata ismételt biopszia segítségével.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of prostate cancer is still controversial. One of the most common treatment form is the use of LHRH analogs, but its way of action is still not cleared enough. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of some histological and immuno-histochemical parameters based on repeated biopsies taken from prostate carcinoma patients. PATIENTS/METHOD: At the time of diagnosis by needle biopsy the TNM stage, serum PSA level, Gleason's grade, apoptotic and mitotic index, as well as Ki67, p53 and bcl2 expression were investigated in 60 prostate carcinoma patients. Anti-androgen therapy supplemented with surgical or chemical castration (with LHRH analogs) was administered. Serum PSA-test and needle biopsy were repeated 13-14 weeks after starting the therapy, simultaneously with determination of the apoptotic and mitotic index, Ki67, p53 and bcl2 expression. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were alive at the end of the study (average 23.46 +/- 8.6 months) and thirteen patients died (average 25.3 +/- 14.8 months). Initial TNM stage and Gleason's score proved to be of prognostic value. Decrease in mitotic index and increase in apoptotic index during therapy proved to predict favourable long-term response to androgen ablation therapy. Similarly, lower Ki67 and (mutant) p53 expression in the first and also in the second biopsy pointed to a favourable effect of antiandrogen and especially of LHRH analog treatment. Since the ratio between Ki67 percentage and apoptotic index strongly decreased in the survivors upon therapy, changes in Ki67/apoptosis ratio may be recommended as a histologically detectable predictive factor. However, bcl2 expression did not show significant correlation with the outcome of the disease. CONCLUSION: Histological evaluation of parameters such as mitotic and apoptotic index as well as Ki67 and p53 expression in repeated biopsies during treatment may contribute to predicting the value of the actual treatment and may be useful to institute alterations in therapy.