ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of adverse outcomes among parturients with large for gestational age (LGA; birth weight ≥ 90th) newborns, stratified by diabetes status. Additionally, we described the temporal trends of adverse outcomes among LGA neonates. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used the U.S. Vital Statistics dataset between 2014 and 2020. The inclusion criteria were singleton, nonanomalous LGA live births who labored and delivered at 24 to 41 weeks with known diabetes status. The coprimary outcomes were composite neonatal adverse outcomes of the following: Apgar score < 5 at 5 minutes, assisted ventilation > 6 hours, seizure, or neonatal or infant mortality, and maternal adverse outcomes of the following: maternal transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit, or unplanned procedure. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Average annual percent change (AAPC) was calculated to assess changes in rates of LGA and morbidity over time. RESULTS: Of 27 million births in 7 years, 1,843,467 (6.8%) met the inclusion criteria. While 1,656,888 (89.9%) did not have diabetes, 186,579 (10.1%) were with diabetes. Composite neonatal adverse outcomes (aRR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.43, 1.52) and composite maternal adverse outcomes (aRR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.36, 1.38) were significantly higher among individuals with diabetes, compared with those without diabetes. From 2014 to 2020, the LGA rate was stable among people without diabetes. However, there was a downward trend of LGA in people with diabetes (AAPC = - 2.4, 95% CI = - 3.5, -1.4). CONCLUSION: In pregnancies with LGA newborns, composite neonatal and maternal morbidities were higher in those with diabetes, compared with those without diabetes. KEY POINTS: · Large for gestational age stratified by diabetes status.. · Composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes are worse among individuals with diabetes as compared to those without.. · During 2014 to 2020, the trend of LGA in individuals without diabetes increased..
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain whether the length of time to complete the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, nonanomalous individuals who were screened for GDM at ≥24 weeks' gestation at an academic hospital system. We compared outcomes among people who were diagnosed with GDM and completed the 3-hour glucose tolerance test (GTT) ≤14 second versus >14 days from the 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome of the following: large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth injury, respiratory distress, hypoglycemia, or fetal/neonatal death. The secondary outcomes included several individual neonatal and maternal morbidities. Multivariable Poisson's regression models were used to evaluate the association. Adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 313 individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM and had an 1-hour GCT ≥ 135 mg/dL; of them, 171 (54.6%) completed the 3-hour GTT ≤14 days, 142 (45.4%) completed the 3-hour GTT > 14 days. Overall rate of the primary outcome was 44.1%. After multivariable adjustment, the risk of the primary outcome was similar between people who completed the two-step method in ≤14 versus >14 days (aRR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.81-1.52). There was no significant difference in all secondary adverse outcomes between the two groups. Subgroup analyses, limited to people diagnosed with GDM (N = 89, 23.4%), also found similar results as the full analyses. CONCLUSION: Among individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM, completion of the 3-hour GTT within ≤14 versus ≥ 14 days was not associated with an increase rate of the adverse outcomes. KEY POINTS: · Among pregnant people in an academic practice, 50% of people with abnormal 1-hour GTT completed GDM two-step screening in 14 days.. · Longer length of time to completion of diagnostic testing for GDM was not associated with an increased rate of adverse outcomes.. · Pregnant people that were diagnosed with GDM and completed the two-step method in >14 days did not have worse perinatal outcomes..
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although successful trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) resulting in vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) can lead to improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, an unsuccessful TOLAC is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture, higher blood loss, and increased risk of infection. Data remain limited in terms of whether differences in gestational age of patients who attempt TOLAC affect maternal morbidity. Out objective was to examine the association between gestational age and maternal adverse outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor after cesarean. METHODS: This population-based cross-sectional study used birth data from the U.S. National Vital Statistics from 2014 to 2018. Women with liveborn singleton gestation who underwent TOLAC at 23 - 41 weeks' gestation were included in the analytic population. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal adverse outcomes: admission to the intensive care unit, blood transfusion, uterine rupture, or unplanned hysterectomy. Secondary outcomes were individual measures within the primary composite outcome. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent TOLAC at term (37-41 weeks gestational age) and those who underwent TOLAC at preterm (23-36 weeks gestational age). Multivariable analyses adjusted for demographic and obstetric differences between the two groups. RESULTS: 455,284 patients met inclusion criteria for the study; 39,589 (8.7%) were at a preterm gestational age (GA) and 415,695 (91.3%) were at a term GA. The overall composite maternal adverse outcome was significantly higher for patients undergoing TOLAC at preterm GA (12.0 per 1,000 live births) compared to term GA (8.0 per 1,000 live births; aRR1.42; 95% CI 1.29-1.56). Among individual conditions within the primary composite outcome, preterm gestational age was associated with increased risk of admission to the intensive care unit, blood transfusion, and unplanned hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent TOLAC, preterm gestational age was associated with increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of adverse outcomes with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) before and after implementation of drills or simulation exercises. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all English studies that reported on rates of PPH and associated complications during the pre- and post-implementation of interventional exercises. STUDY APPRASIAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two investigators independently reviewed the abstracts, and full articles for eligibility of all studies. Inconsistencies related to study evaluation or data extraction were resolved by a third author. The co-primary outcomes were the rate of PPH and of any transfusion; the secondary outcomes included admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), transfusion ≥ 4 units of packed red blood cells, hysterectomy, or maternal death. Study effects were combined by Bayesian meta-analysis and reported as risk ratios (RR) and 95% credible intervals (Cr). RESULTS: We reviewed 142 full length articles. Of these, 18 publications, with 355,060 deliveries-150,562 (42%) deliveries during the pre-intervention and 204,498 (57.6%) deliveries in the post-interventional period-were included in the meta-analysis. Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, only three studies were considered good quality, and none of them were done in the US. The rate of PPH prior to intervention was 5.06% and 5.46% afterwards (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.87-1.36; probability of reduction in the diagnosis being 21%). The likelihood of transfusion decreased from 1.68% in the pre-intervention to 1.27% in the post-intervention period (RR 0.80, 95% Cr 0.57-1.09). The overall probability of reduction in transfusion was 93%, albeit it varied among studies done in non-US countries (96%) versus in the US (23%). Transfusion of 4 units or more of blood occurred in 0.44% of deliveries before intervention and 0.37% afterwards (RR of 0.85, 95% CI 0.50-1.52), with the overall probability of reduction being 72% (76% probability of reduction in studies from non-US countries and 49% reduction with reports from the US). Surgical interventions to manage PPH, which was not reported in any US studies, occurred in 0.14% before intervention and 0.28% afterwards (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.56-3.06; probability of reduction 27%). Admission to the ICU occurred in 0.10% before intervention and 0.08% subsequently (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.58-1.43), with the overall probability of reduction being 65% (81% in studies from non-US countries and 27% from the study done in the US). Maternal death occurred in 0.17% in the pre-intervention period and 0.09% during the post-intervention (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.33-1.05; probability of reduction 93% in studies from non-US countries and 82% in one study from the US). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce the sequelae of PPH are associated with decrease in adverse outcomes. The conclusion, however, ought not to be accepted reflexively for the US population. All of the studies on the topic done in the US are of poor quality and the associated probability of reduction in sequelae are consistently lower than those done in other countries. SYNOPSIS: Since the putative benefits of PPH drills or simulation exercises are based on poor quality pre- and post-intervention trials, policies recommending them ought to be revisited.
