Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Australas Psychiatry ; 28(3): 354-358, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32093504

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We explored the feasibility of developing, running and evaluating a simulation-based medical education (SBME) workshop to improve the knowledge, skills and attitudes of emergency department (ED) doctors when called on to assess patients in psychiatric crisis. METHOD: We designed a four-hour workshop incorporating SBME and a blend of pre-reading, short didactic elements and multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Emergency department nurses (operating as SBME faculty) used prepared scripts to portray patients presenting in psychiatric crisis. They were interviewed in front of, and by, ED doctors. We collected structured course evaluations, Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) scores, and pre- and post-course MCQs. RESULTS: The pilot workshop was delivered to 12 ED registrars using only existing resources of the Psychiatry and Emergency Departments. Participants highly valued both 'level of appropriateness' (Likert rating µ = 4.8/5.0) and 'overall usefulness' (µ = 4.7/5.0) of the programme. They reported an improved understanding of the mental state and of relevant legal issues and rated the debriefings highly (participant DASH rating: n = 193; score µ = 6.3/7.0). Median MCQ scores improved non-significantly pre- and post-course (7.5/12 vs 10/12, p = 0.261). CONCLUSION: An SBME workshop with these aims could be delivered and evaluated using the existing resources of the Psychiatry and Emergency Departments.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Computer Simulation , Education, Medical/methods , Education/methods , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/methods , Physicians , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Program Evaluation
2.
AMA J Ethics ; 20(12): E1119-1125, 2018 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30585573

ABSTRACT

Patients with delusional infestation are unlikely to agree to take the mainstay of treatment-antipsychotic medication. While stressing the general importance of truth telling in medicine, we suggest that, in some cases of delusional infestation, patients' lack of decision-making capacity will-provided a series of criteria are met-justify briefly withholding their diagnosis. We acknowledge this action as a kind of deception with ethical pitfalls and discuss those related to prescribing antipsychotic medication without frank disclosure. We recommend full disclosure of a delusional infestation diagnosis when the patient is recovered, despite this action's potential to exacerbate stigma.


Subject(s)
Morals , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Physicians/ethics , Physicians/psychology , Schizophrenia, Paranoid , Stereotyping , Truth Disclosure/ethics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude of Health Personnel , Deception , Decision Making , Ethics, Medical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...