Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0131805, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26151864

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Patient-reported experience measures are increasingly being used to routinely monitor the quality of care. With the increasing attention on such measures, hospital managers seek ways to systematically improve patient experience across hospital departments, in particular where outcomes are used for public reporting or reimbursement. However, it is currently unclear whether hospitals with more mature quality management systems or stronger focus on patient involvement and patient-centered care strategies perform better on patient-reported experience. We assessed the effect of such strategies on a range of patient-reported experience measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We employed a cross-sectional, multi-level study design randomly recruiting hospitals from the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey between May 2011 and January 2012. Each hospital contributed patient level data for four conditions/pathways: acute myocardial infarction, stroke, hip fracture and deliveries. The outcome variables in this study were a set of patient-reported experience measures including a generic 6-item measure of patient experience (NORPEQ), a 3-item measure of patient-perceived discharge preparation (Health Care Transition Measure) and two single item measures of perceived involvement in care and hospital recommendation. Predictor variables included three hospital management strategies: maturity of the hospital quality management system, patient involvement in quality management functions and patient-centered care strategies. We used directed acyclic graphs to detail and guide the modeling of the complex relationships between predictor variables and outcome variables, and fitted multivariable linear mixed models with random intercept by hospital, and adjusted for fixed effects at the country level, hospital level and patient level. RESULTS: Overall, 74 hospitals and 276 hospital departments contributed data on 6,536 patients to this study (acute myocardial infarction n = 1,379, hip fracture n = 1,503, deliveries n = 2,088, stroke n = 1,566). Patients admitted for hip fracture and stroke had the lowest scores across the four patient-reported experience measures throughout. Patients admitted after acute myocardial infarction reported highest scores on patient experience and hospital recommendation; women after delivery reported highest scores for patient involvement and health care transition. We found no substantial associations between hospital-wide quality management strategies, patient involvement in quality management, or patient-centered care strategies with any of the patient-reported experience measures. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study so far to assess the complex relationship between quality management strategies and patient experience with care. Our findings suggest absence of and wide variations in the institutionalization of strategies to engage patients in quality management, or implement strategies to improve patient-centeredness of care. Seemingly counterintuitive inverse associations could be capturing a scenario where hospitals with poorer quality management were beginning to improve their patient experience. The former suggests that patient-centered care is not yet sufficiently integrated in quality management, while the latter warrants a nuanced assessment of the motivation and impact of involving patients in the design and assessment of services.


Subject(s)
Hospitals/standards , Patients/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hip Fractures/psychology , Hospital Administration/standards , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/psychology , Patient Participation , Patient Satisfaction , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/standards , Stroke/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Stroke ; 45(12): 3663-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25378421

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies have reported higher risks of death and other adverse outcomes in acute stroke patients admitted off-hours; however, little is known about the underlying mechanisms. According to time of admission, our aim was to examine compliance with performance measures for acute stroke care processes, including the effect of a systematic quality improvement program, and to examine 30 days case-fatality. METHODS: A population-based historical cohort study, including patients admitted to Danish hospitals with a first ever acute stroke (January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2011; N=64 975). Off-hours were weekends and evening and nighttime shifts on weekdays. Compliance with performance measures was compared using general linear modeling, and odds ratios for 30 days case-fatality were obtained using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients admitted off-hours had a lower chance of compliance with 8 out of 10 performance measures; however, these differences diminished over time. Unadjusted odds ratio for 30 days case-fatality, for patients admitted off-hours compared with patients admitted on-hours, was 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.21). Adjusting for patient characteristics (in particular, stroke severity) decreased the odds ratio to 1.03 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.10). Additional adjustment for hospital characteristics and compliance with performance measures had no effect on the odds ratio. CONCLUSION: Patients admitted off-hours received a poorer quality of care. However, the admission time-related differences in care were substantially reduced over time, and the differences in 30 days case-fatality appeared primarily to be explained by differences in stroke severity.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Neurology/standards , Stroke/epidemiology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Denmark , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurology/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors
3.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 26 Suppl 1: 47-55, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24578501

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore how European hospitals have implemented patient safety strategies (PSS) and evidence-based organization of care pathway (EBOP) recommendations and examine the extent to which implementation varies between countries and hospitals. DESIGN: Mixed-method multilevel cross-sectional design in seven countries as part of the European Union-funded project 'Deepening our Understanding of Quality improvement in Europe' (DUQuE). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four acute care hospitals with 292 departments managing acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hip fracture, stroke, and obstetric deliveries. Main outcome measure Five multi-item composite measures-one generic measure for PSS and four pathway-specific measures for EBOP. RESULTS: Potassium chloride had only been removed from general medication stocks in 9.4-30.5% of different pathways wards and patients were adequately identified with wristband in 43.0-59.7%. Although 86.3% of areas treating AMI patients had immediate access to a specialist physician, only 56.0% had arrangements for patients to receive thrombolysis within 30 min of arrival at the hospital. A substantial amount of the total variance observed was due to between-hospital differences in the same country for PSS (65.9%). In EBOP, between-country differences play also an important role (10.1% in AMI to 57.1% in hip fracture). CONCLUSIONS: There were substantial gaps between evidence and practice of PSS and EBOP in a sample of European hospitals and variations due to country differences are more important in EBOP than in PSS, but less important than within-country variations. Agencies supporting the implementation of PSS and EBOP should closely re-examine the effectiveness of their current strategies.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Practice , Hospitals/standards , Patient Safety , Safety Management/methods , Analysis of Variance , European Union , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality Improvement/organization & administration
5.
Respir Med ; 105(7): 1063-8, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21320769

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We examined the positive predictive value of diagnoses of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the Danish National Patient Registry. We also examined the negative predictive value of acute pneumonia or respiratory failure discharge diagnoses for absence of underlying COPD. METHODS: We identified all patients aged 30 years or older with acute hospital admission in Denmark from January 1st to December 31st 2008. Physicians at 34 Danish hospitals retrieved and reviewed medical records for 1581 patients with a discharge diagnosis of COPD, and for 1546 patients with a discharge diagnosis of either pneumonia or respiratory failure but no COPD diagnosis. Presence of COPD was assessed based on medical history, clinical symptoms and findings, and spirometry results. RESULTS: The overall positive predictive value for COPD was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 91-93%). Among patients coded with pneumonia or respiratory failure but not COPD, 19% (95% CI = 17-21%) had COPD, corresponding to a negative predictive value for COPD of 81% (95% CI = 79-83%). CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive value of acute COPD discharge diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry is high. At the same time, there is a substantial underrecording of COPD during hospitalizations with other acute respiratory disorders like pneumonia and respiratory failure.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Registries , Reproducibility of Results , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , Respiratory Insufficiency/epidemiology , Spirometry
6.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 9: 186, 2009 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19822018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We examined the association between quality of care and 30 day mortality in a nationwide cohort of patients hospitalized with hip fracture. METHODS: We used data from The Danish National Indicator Project, a quality improvement initiative with participation of more than 90% of Danish hospital departments caring for patients with hip fracture between August 16, 2005 and August 15, 2006. Quality of care was measured in terms of meeting five specific criteria: early assessment of the patient's nutritional risk, systematic pain assessment during mobilization, assessment of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) before the fracture, assessment of ADL before discharge, and initiation of treatment to prevent future osteoporotic fractures. The association between meeting each of the quality of care criteria for the patient and 30 day mortality was examined using logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: 6,266 patients hospitalized with an incident episode of hip fracture were included in the study. For four of the five quality of care criteria, patients who met the criterion had substantially lower 30 day mortality after hip fracture. The adjusted mortality odds ratios (ORs) ranged from 0.42 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.58) for assessment of ADL before discharge (excluding deaths during hospitalization) to 0.72 (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.00) for systematic pain assessment. We found an inverse dose-response relationship between the number of quality of care criteria met and 30 day mortality; the lowest mortality was found among patients for whom all five quality of care criteria were met, as compared with patients for whom no quality of care criteria were met: adjusted mortality OR 0.18 (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.36). CONCLUSION: Higher quality of care during hospitalization with hip fracture was associated with lowered 30 day mortality.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/therapy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/standards , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Hip Fractures/mortality , Humans , Life Style , Logistic Models , Male , Smoking/epidemiology , Time Factors
7.
J Surg Oncol ; 99(8): 500-4, 2009 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19466740

ABSTRACT

This article describes the Danish National Indicator Project that aims to document and improve the quality of care at national level. Specific clinical indicators, standards, and prognostic factors have been developed for eight diseases (e.g. lung cancer). It has been implemented in all clinical departments in Denmark. Participation is mandatory. Results related to lung cancer are presented and discussed. The experiences from 2000 to 2008 indicate that the quality of care related to the eight diseases improve over time and that that performance and outcome measurement will get paid in terms of quality improvement.


Subject(s)
National Health Programs/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration , Total Quality Management/organization & administration , Clinical Audit , Denmark , Health Plan Implementation , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Survival Analysis , Total Quality Management/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...