Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 100(10): e70, 2018 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29762292

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Providing high-value care for urgent orthopaedic trauma patients requires effective and timely treatment. Herein, we describe the implementation of an innovative program utilizing the operating room (OR) capacity of a satellite campus to decrease stress on a pediatric tertiary care center without jeopardizing patient safety. METHODS: In addition to the daily emergency surgical room on the main campus, a dedicated orthopaedic trauma surgery OR was established in a satellite hospital location for 3 days per week in the summer and for 2 days per week for the rest of the year. Nonemergency, non-multitrauma operative fracture cases presenting to our tertiary care facility emergency department or orthopaedic clinic were considered for satellite referral. Eligible patients required clearance for transfer via orthopaedic, emergency department, and anesthesia checklists. An opt-out policy was established for provider judgment or patient family concern to overrule transfer decisions. Selected patients were discharged home with satellite OR scheduling or approved for same-day satellite location admission. Short elective cases were performed when openings existed in the schedule. RESULTS: From June 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017, 480 cases (372 trauma, 108 elective) were completed in our satellite OR. The most common trauma cases that were treated in the satellite OR were type-II supracondylar humeral fractures (n = 76). Summer months averaged 41.75 trauma cases and 11.25 elective cases per month, with 3.15 trauma cases and 0.85 elective cases per day. Nonsummer months averaged 22.78 trauma cases and 7.00 elective cases per month, with 2.93 trauma and 0.90 elective cases per day. Of the 17 postoperative issues, the greatest number (n = 7 [41%]) involved symptomatic hardware. The remaining complications were not surgeon or geographic-site-specific. There were no intraoperative complications, compartment syndrome episodes, or patients who required transfer back to our tertiary care facility for unexpected or serious medical issues. CONCLUSIONS: With the proper screening protocols in place for appropriate patient selection, the use of a dedicated satellite orthopaedic trauma OR can increase capacity without compromising patient safety.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Hospitals, Satellite , Operating Rooms , Orthopedic Procedures , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Male , Patient Selection , Program Evaluation , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(2): 131-135, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27817757

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE The maximum safe storage interval after endoscope reprocessing remains unknown. We assessed the association between storage interval and endoscope contamination to evaluate the need for scope reprocessing prior to use. METHODS We conducted a study in 2 phases. In phase 1, we cultured 9 gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes that had been stored for at least 7 days since reprocessing. Each scope was cultured in 3 places: external surfaces of hand piece, insertion tube, and internal channels. In phase 2, after reprocessing these scopes, we hung and cultured them prospectively in a similar fashion at 1-, 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-week intervals without patient use. We defined clinically relevant contamination as >100 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). RESULTS In phase 1, median hang time was 69 days (range, 8-555 days). Considering the 27 total cultures, 3 of 27 GI endoscopes (11.1%) had positive cultures, all with nonpathogenic skin flora at ≤100 CFU/mL. Median hang time was not statistically different between scopes with positive and negative cultures (P=.82). In phase 2, 7 of 131 prospective cultures (5.3%) from 6 of 9 GI endoscopes at varying storage intervals were positive, all at ≤100 CFU/mL. At 56 days after reprocessing (the longest storage interval studied), 1 of 24 cultures (4.2%) was positive (100 CFU/mL of Bacillus species from external biopsy/suction ports). CONCLUSIONS No endoscopes demonstrated clinically relevant contamination at hang times ranging from 7 to 555 days, and most scopes remained uncontaminated up to 56 days after reprocessing. Our data suggest that properly cleaned and disinfected GI endoscopes could be stored safely for longer intervals than currently recommended. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2017;38:131-135.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal/microbiology , Equipment Contamination , Equipment Reuse , Fungi/growth & development , Colony Count, Microbial , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disinfection/methods , Hospital Units , Humans , Massachusetts , Pediatrics , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...