Anterior Open Bite In 27 Months Old Children after Use of a Novel Pacifier - A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present cohort study was to evaluate the influence of a novel pacifier on the first formation of malocclusion, the anterior open bite in children. STUDY DESIGN: 129 newborn children whose parents had decided to use pacifiers were randomly attributed to two experimental groups (D=Dentistar, n=56, Novatex, Pattensen, Germany; N=NUK, n=73, Mapa, Zeven, Germany). Children (n=42) who did not use a pacifier were not randomized and served as reference (C). Primary outcome was the presence of anterior open bite. It was hypothesized that D would result in lower incidence when compared to N. At the age of 27 months the children were examined with respect to anterior open bite. Fisher's exact test served to detect significant differences between groups D and N (SPSS 22.0). RESULTS: 121 children with a mean age of 26.7 months were included in the final analysis (D: n=45; N: n=42; C: n=34). In group D three children (6.7%) showed an anterior open bite. The respective values were 21 (50.0%) for N and 0 for C. The results for group D compared to N were significantly different (chi(2)-test, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In comparison to a commonly used pacifier the novel one causes significantly less anterior open bites.

Efficacy of a novel pacifier in the prevention of anterior open bite.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test a novel pacifier (Dentistar) regarding the development of anterior open bite in infants. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine newborn children were randomly assigned to 2 experimental groups: NUK (N; N =73); and Dentistar (D; N=56. Children (N=42) who did not use a pacifier served as the control (C). At 10- to 26-months old, the children were re-examined (via a blind operator) regarding the existence of an anterior open bite. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one toddlers (66 females, 55 males) were included in the final analysis (N: N=42; D: N=43; C: N=36). The mean age was 15.9 (±3.9 SD) months. In Group N, 16 children (38%) showed an anterior open bite, 2 (5%) in Group D, and 0 in Group C. The incidence of open bites was significantly less in Groups D and C vs N (chi-square test, P<.001). No significant difference was found between D and C. CONCLUSION: Pacifier use may promote open bites in 16-month-old infants. Compared to a commonly used pacifier, the Dentistar caused almost no anterior open bites and, therefore, can be recommended for children younger than 16 months old.

Cleaning efficacy and soft tissue trauma after use of manual toothbrushes with different bristle stiffness.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of manual toothbrushes of the same type with different bristle stiffness concerning plaque removal, gingivitis development, and soft tissue trauma. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, three groups with 40 subjects each used manual toothbrushes with either hard-, medium-, or soft-bristle stiffness. The at-home brushing time was set for 2 minutes, twice a day. Four and 8 weeks after the baseline examination, clinical parameters for plaque removal, gingivitis, and soft tissue damage were recorded again. Recruitment and examinations of the subjects were performed at the Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry and Endodontics, Heinrich Heine University. A total of 120 volunteers (age range: 18 to 62 years) were recruited and stratified according to sex and age. Primary outcome measures were differences in the Quigley and Hein index (QHI) and papillary bleeding index (PBI) compared to baseline; secondary outcome measures were differences in the modified approximal plaque index (MAPI) and Danser gingival abrasion index. RESULTS: The QHI and MAPI showed lower index scores in subjects who used hard-bristled toothbrushes after 8 weeks (P <0.05 and P <0.001, respectively). In contrast, subjects who used toothbrushes with hard bristles demonstrated more gingival lesions (P <0.01) and higher PBI scores after 4 and 8 weeks (P <0.001) compared to subjects who used soft- or medium-bristled toothbrushes. CONCLUSION: Manual toothbrushes with hard bristles may better remove plaque, but may also cause more soft tissue trauma compared to brushes with softer bristles.

Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study.

This clinical retrospective study assessed the longevity of CAD-CAM ceramic restorations (Cerec) inserted into the cavities of 95 patients in a private practice in Berlin, Germany. Three hundred and eight ceramic restorations were inserted into cavities in the posterior teeth of 95 patients between 1992 and 1994. One operator placed all restorations in a single sitting. Seventy-four patients, including 226 restorations, returned to the practice for a final examination at the end of 10 years. Reasons for non-attendance include relocation (15), death (2) and personal reasons (4). Again, all examinations were performed by a single examiner, however, not the same dentist who initially treated the patients. Out of the 226 restorations, 39 had been inserted in Class I cavities and 187 in Class II cavities (84 two-surfaces, 103 three or more surfaces). In the latter group, one cusp was replaced in 20 cases and two cusps in three cases. All the restorations were fabricated using Cerec 1 (46 Dicor, 180 Vita Mark II) and cemented adhesively with Vita Cerec Duo Cement in combination with Syntac Classic under a rubber dam. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was calculated under the following failure-criteria: (1) secondary decay, (2) any kind of loss of the restoration, (3) fracture of the restoration, (4) tooth fracture and (5) marginal gap reaching dentin or base material. For statistical analysis, SPSS 12.0 was used. The survival rate was 94.7% (12 failures) after five years and 85.7% (23 failures) after 10 years. The results of the current study show that the survival rate of Cerec 1 restorations, as applied in this study, are comparable with the survival rates of cast gold restorations.

Determination of the performance of various root canal disinfection methods after in situ carriage.

The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial performance of the Endox Endodontic System (Lysis Srl, Nova Milanese, Italy), MTAD (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and HealOzone (Kavo, Biberach, Germany). Seventy instrumented and initially sterile roots with open accesses and containing a paper point were carried by one volunteer in the oral cavity for 1 week. After removal, samples were taken for microbiological analysis. The root canals were then disinfected with the Endox Endodontic System, MTAD, 3% NaOCl, or HealOzone, and, thereafter, samples were repeated for microbiological analysis. The roots were then sealed and incubated for a further week, after which bacterial growth was again determined. After disinfection, there was a significant decrease in the absolute bacterial count between each disinfection method and the positive control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the NaOCl, MTAD, and HealOzone groups. The Endox device showed the least antibacterial effect with significant differences to MTAD and HealOzone. Bacterial regrowth after 1 week of incubation was detected in all samples of the control group, whereas test groups showed several bacteria-free samples.

Bacterial leakage in roots filled with different medicaments and sealed with Cavit.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the time required by four different root canal medications coupled with the temporary filling material Cavit (ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) to prevent penetration of bacteria into the root canal. There were 145 roots prepared in a standardized manner. Four groups with 15 samples each were dressed with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)(2)), a 5% chlorhexidine gel (CHX), a chloromono-campherphenolic compound (ChKM), and Ledermix (LM), respectively, and sealed with Cavit. Four control groups contained identical medications but the roots were left unsealed. The 25 remaining roots served as additional controls. A standard setup for bacterial leakage studies was chosen with Staphylococcus epidermidis as test strain. Cavit application resulted in a significantly better seal compared with the unsealed groups. In the Cavit-sealed groups, all groups differed significantly from one another except for the CHX and the ChKM groups. The Ca(OH)(2) medicated roots provided the longest protection (median of 36 days), followed by the Ledermix-group (27 days) and the CHX (18 days) or ChKM groups (19 days). It may be concluded that Cavit-sealed and medicated root canals do not provide adequate protection against bacterial leakage for more than 1 month.

Clinically controlled study on the quality of class III, IV and V composite restorations after two years.

PURPOSE: The quality of fillings consisting of a hybrid composite was compared with fillings consisting of two different microfilled composites in a clinical examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the design of a clinically controlled two-year study conducted under practice-relevant conditions, the composites C-Fill MH (Megadenta), Helio Progress (Vivadent), and Visio-Dispers (ESPE) were examined in anterior-tooth cavities in 134 patients by means of the split-mouth technique. The clinical examinations were performed based on modified Ryge criteria (marginal integrity, anatomical form, secondary caries, color, marginal discoloration, surface roughness) after 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: Immediately following filling application, all evaluation criteria except color were assessed as level A. After 12 and 24 months, C-Fill MH was found to be significantly superior to the other materials with regard to marginal integrity, color, and marginal discoloration. CONCLUSION: The hybrid composite C-Fill MH seems to be superior to the microfilled composites and should therefore be preferred as a restorative filling material.

Relationship of radiologic and histologic signs of inflammation in human root-filled teeth.

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between histologic and radiologic signs of inflammation in human root-filled teeth. In addition, other factors with possible importance for apical inflammation were assessed. Fifty-three block sections of root-filled teeth were gathered from human cadavers. The blocks were radiographically exposed, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histologic sections were categorized as inflamed or uninflamed. Radiographically, the roots were assigned as apical lucency, widened periodontal ligament (PDL), or no lucency. Presence and contents of accessory canals were recorded (empty, tissue, or filling material). Statistical analysis was performed with the Chi-square test. All roots had accessory canals; 12 showed tissue remnants, and the others were empty. Of the cases, 49% were histologically uninflamed at the apex, and 52% appeared radiographically intact. The odds ratio of finding a histologically inflamed apex with radiologic lucency versus a radiographically intact apex was 9.2 (p = 0.002). The odds ratio of finding a histologically uninflamed apex with a radiologically tight coronal seal versus an unacceptable seal was 3.7 (p = 0.053). It may be concluded that there are relationships between radiologic and histologic signs of inflammation in human root canal-treated teeth. There appears to be a tendency that the radiologically determined quality of the coronal seal has an impact on the histologic state of the root-filled tooth. No relationship was detected between unfilled lateral or accessory canals and the status of inflammation at the periapex (51% inflamed, 49% uninflamed).

In situ antimicrobial effectiveness of chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide: gel and paste versus gutta-percha points.

The aim of this study was to determine the antibacterial effectiveness of either chlorhexidine or calcium hydroxide integrated in gutta-percha points compared with chlorhexidine or calcium hydroxide delivered as gel or paste, respectively. A total of 70 initially sterile roots with open accesses were carried for 1 week in the oral cavities of two volunteers. The roots were then removed, and samples were taken from the root canals for microbial analysis. The roots were medicated with calcium hydroxide paste, 5% chlorhexidine gel, or a chlorhexidine- or calcium hydroxide-containing gutta-percha point. The accesses were closed with bonding material, and the roots incubated for 1 week. After removal of the antimicrobial agents, roots were again checked for bacterial growth. One thioglycolate-soaked paper point was then introduced into each canal, and roots were incubated for 1 week more to observe bacterial regrowth. After 1 week of medication, the absolute bacterial count revealed significant differences compared with the controls. However, only the chlorhexidine-gel and the calcium hydroxide paste group showed no microbial colonization in a considerable number of samples after 1 and 2 weeks.