Metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in patients with advanced stage follicular lymphoma from the RELEVANCE trial.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the prognostic value of baseline positron emission tomography (PET) parameters for patients with treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma (FL) in the phase III RELEVANCE trial, comparing the immunomodulatory combination of lenalidomide and rituximab (R2) versus R-chemotherapy (R-chemo), with both regimens followed by R maintenance therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Baseline characteristics of the entire PET-evaluable population (n = 406/1032) were well balanced between treatment arms. The maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) and the standardized maximal distance between tow lesions (SDmax) were extracted, the standardized distance between two lesions the furthest apart, were extracted. The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) was computed using the 41% SUVmax method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the 6-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 57.8%, the median TMTV was 284 cm3, SUVmax was 11.3 and SDmax was 0.32 m-1, with no significant difference between arms. High TMTV (>510 cm3) and FLIPI were associated with an inferior PFS (P = 0.013 and P = 0.006, respectively), whereas SUVmax and SDmax were not (P = 0.08 and P = 0.12, respectively). In multivariable analysis, follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) and TMTV remained significantly associated with PFS (P = 0.0119 and P = 0.0379, respectively). These two adverse factors combined stratified the overall population into three risk groups: patients with no risk factors (40%), with one factor (44%), or with both (16%), with a 6-year PFS of 67.7%, 54.5%, and 41.0%, respectively. No significant interaction between treatment arms and TMTV or FLIPI (P = 0.31 or P = 0.59, respectively) was observed. The high-risk group (high TMTV and FLIPI 3-5) had a similar PFS in both arms (P = 0.45) with a median PFS of 68.4% in the R-chemo arm versus 71.4% in the R2 arm. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline TMTV is predictive of PFS, independently of FLIPI, in patients with advanced FL even in the context of antibody maintenance.

The ECHELON-2 Trial: 5-year results of a randomized, phase III study of brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: For patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), outcomes using frontline treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like therapy are typically poor. The ECHELON-2 study demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) exhibited statistically superior progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central review and improvements in overall survival versus CHOP for the frontline treatment of patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma or other CD30-positive PTCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ECHELON-2 is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, active-comparator phase III study. We present an exploratory update of the ECHELON-2 study, including an analysis of 5-year PFS per investigator in the intent-to-treat analysis group. RESULTS: A total of 452 patients were randomized (1 : 1) to six or eight cycles of A+CHP (N = 226) or CHOP (N = 226). At median follow-up of 47.6 months, 5-year PFS rates were 51.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 42.8% to 59.4%] with A+CHP versus 43.0% (95% CI: 35.8% to 50.0%) with CHOP (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53-0.91), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.1% (95% CI: 63.3% to 75.9%) with A+CHP versus 61.0% (95% CI: 54.0% to 67.3%) with CHOP (hazard ratio = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53-0.99). Both PFS and OS were generally consistent across key subgroups. Peripheral neuropathy was resolved or improved in 72% (84/117) of patients in the A+CHP arm and 78% (97/124) in the CHOP arm. Among patients who relapsed and subsequently received brentuximab vedotin, the objective response rate was 59% with brentuximab vedotin retreatment after A+CHP and 50% with subsequent brentuximab vedotin after CHOP. CONCLUSIONS: In this 5-year update of ECHELON-2, frontline treatment of patients with PTCL with A+CHP continues to provide clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS versus CHOP, with a manageable safety profile, including continued resolution or improvement of peripheral neuropathy.

Updated results from the phase 3 HELIOS study of ibrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.

We report follow-up results from the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 HELIOS trial of ibrutinib+bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) without deletion 17p. Overall, 578 patients were randomized 1:1 to either ibrutinib (420 mg daily) or placebo, in combination with 6 cycles of BR, followed by ibrutinib or placebo alone. Median follow-up was 34.8 months (range: 0.1-45.8). Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached for ibrutinib+BR, versus 14.3 months for placebo+BR (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.206 [0.159-0.265]; P < 0.0001); 36-month PFS rates were 68.0% versus 13.9%, respectively. The results are consistent with the primary analysis findings (HR = 0.203, as assessed by independent review committee, with 17-month median follow-up). Median overall survival was not reached in either arm; HR (95% CI) for ibrutinib+BR versus placebo: 0.652 (0.454-0.935; P = 0.019). Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative response rates were 26.3% for ibrutinib+BR and 6.2% for placebo+BR (P < 0.0001). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (including grades 3-4) were generally consistent with the initial HELIOS report. These long-term data support improved survival outcomes and deepening responses with ibrutinib+BR compared with BR in relapsed CLL/SLL.

A phase II trial of lenalidomide plus rituximab in previously untreated follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): CALGB 50803 (Alliance).

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, phase II trial tested the tolerability and efficacy of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with grade 1-3a FL, stage 3-4 or bulky stage 2, FL international prognostic index (FLIPI) 0-2, and no prior therapy were eligible to receive rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly during cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 4, 6, 8, and 10, plus lenalidomide 20-25 mg on days 1-21 for twelve 28-day cycles. The primary objectives were to evaluate response rates [complete (CR) and overall] and time to progression. Secondary objectives included toxicity, response according to polymorphisms in FcgR2A and FcgR3A, and changes in circulating pro-angiogenic cells. RESULTS: From October 2010 to September 2011, 66 patients were enrolled. Median age was 53 years, 34 were female, 15 had bulky disease, 21 were FLIPI 0-1, 43 FLIPI 2, and 2 FLIPI 3. One patient withdrew before receiving treatment. Fifty-one patients completed 12 cycles of lenalidomide. Reasons for discontinuation included withdrawal (n = 6), adverse events (n = 6), progression (n = 2). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (21%), lymphopenia (9%), and thrombocytopenia (2%), infection (11%), and rash (8%). Grade 1-2 toxicity included fatigue (78%), diarrhea (37%), rash (32%), and febrile neutropenia in one patient. The overall response rate was 95%; the CR rate was 72% (95% confidence interval, 60% to 83%). With a median follow-up of 5 years, the 2- and 5-year progression-free survival were 86% and 70%, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival was 100%. There was no association between CR rate or PFS and FLIPI, histological grade, bulky disease, FcgR2A/FcgR3A polymorphism, or change in circulating endothelial cell/hematopoietic progenitor cell. CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide plus rituximab was associated with low rates of grade 3-4 toxicity, yielded a CR rate and PFS similar to chemotherapy-based treatment and may represent a reasonable alternative to immunochemotherapy in previously untreated FL. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01145495.

The role of body mass index in survival outcome for lymphoma patients: US intergroup experience.

BACKGROUND: The role of body mass index (BMI) in survival outcomes is controversial among lymphoma patients. We evaluated the association between BMI at study entry and failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) in three phase III clinical trials, among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 537, 730 and 282 patients with DLBCL, HL and FL were included in the analysis. Baseline patient and clinical characteristics, treatment received and clinical outcomes were compared across BMI categories. RESULTS: Among patients with DLBCL, HL and FL, the median age was 70, 33 and 56; 29%, 29% and 37% were obese and 38%, 27% and 37% were overweight, respectively. Age was significantly different among BMI groups in all three studies. Higher BMI groups tended to have more favorable prognosis factors at study entry among DLBCL and HL patients. BMI was not associated with clinical outcome with P-values of 0.89, 0.30 and 0.40 for FFS, and 0.64, 0.67 and 0.09 for OS, for patients with DLBCL, HL and FL, respectively. The association remains non-significant after adjusting for other clinical factors in the Cox model. A subset analysis of males with DLBCL treated on R-CHOP revealed no differences in FFS (P = 0.48) or OS (P = 0.58). CONCLUSION: BMI was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes among patients with DLBCL, HD or FL, in three prospective phase III clinical trials. The findings contradict some previous reports of similar investigations. Further work is required to understand the observed discrepancies.

Serious pulmonary toxicity in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma with SGN-30, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and liposomal doxorubicin is associated with an FcγRIIIa-158 V/F polymorphism.

BACKGROUND: Based on in vitro synergistic cytotoxicity when anti-CD30 antibodies are combined with gemcitabine, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B conducted a double-blind, randomized, phase II trial of SGN-30 with gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (GVD) in patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In part 1 of the trial, 16 patients received SGN-30 with GVD to assess the safety of the combination. In part 2, patients were randomly allocated to SGN-30 (n = 7) or placebo (n = 7) with GVD to determine overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: ORR in all 30 patients was 63% (65% with SGN-30 plus GVD, n = 23, and 57% with placebo plus GVD, n = 7). Median event-free survival was 9.0 months, with no difference between the two arms. Grades 3-5 pneumonitis occurred in five patients receiving SGN-30 and GVD, leading to premature closure of the trial. All five patients with pulmonary toxicity had a V/F polymorphism in the FcγRIIIa gene (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Together with historical data demonstrating a 2% incidence of pulmonary events with GVD, these results indicate that SGN-30 cannot safely be administered concurrently. The risk of pneumonitis with SGN-30 and GVD is greatest in patients with an FcγRIIIa V/F polymorphism.

Gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (GVD), a salvage regimen in relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma: CALGB 59804.

BACKGROUND: Because of high single-agent activity and modest toxicity, we hypothesized the combination of gemcitabine (G), vinorelbine (V), and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (D) would be an effective salvage therapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 91 patients participated. GVD was administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days at doses of G 1000 mg/m(2), V 20 mg/m(2), and D 15 mg/m(2) for transplant-naive patients, and G 800 mg/m(2), V 15 mg/m(2), and D 10 mg/m(2) for post-transplant patients. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity was mucositis for the transplant-naive patients and febrile neutropenia for post-transplant patients. The overall response rate (RR) for all patients was 70% [95% confidence interval (CI) 59.8, 79.7], with 19% complete remissions. The 4-year event-free and overall survival rates in transplant-naive patients treated with GVD followed by autologous transplant were 52% (95% CI 0.34, 0.68) and 70% (95% CI 0.49, 0.84), and in the patients in whom prior transplant failed, these were 10% (95% CI 0.03, 0.22) and 34% (95% CI 0.17, 0.52), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: GVD is a well-tolerated, active regimen for relapsed HL with results similar to those reported for more toxic regimens. High RRs in patients in whom prior transplant failed confirms this regimen's activity even in heavily pretreated patients.

Dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and etoposide (CHOPE) chemotherapy for patients with diffuse lymphoma: Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies 8852 and 8854.

BACKGROUND: To address the feasibility and outcome of moderate dose intensification with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted two studies evaluating dose-escalated cyclophosphamide and etoposide in the cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, etoposide (CHOPE) regimen. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included histologically documented, diffuse small cleaved, diffuse mixed, diffuse large cell, or immunoblastic lymphoma, Stage III--IV or bulky Stage II disease, and an ECOG performance status of 0--1. CALGB 8852, a group-wide study, accrued 227 patients: 120 patients in the pilot study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) without G-CSF and 107 in the pilot study of dose-escalated CHOPE with G-CSF. CALGB 8854, a limited-institution, Phase I study, enrolled 38 patients and determined the MTD of CHOPE with G-CSF to be used in CALGB 8852. The MTD in both studies was defined as the dose at which 50% of patients had 1) Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia lasting 7 days or more, or 2) Grade 3--4 hemorrhage or nonhematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia, nausea, and emesis), or 3) were prevented from receiving 100% of drug on Day 22. RESULTS: The MTD of CHOPE without G-CSF was cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on Days 1--3 with doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) on Day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) (maximum, 2 mg) on Day 1, and prednisone 100 mg on Days 1--5. With the addition of G-CSF at 200 microg/m(2) on Days 5--19, the MTD was cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m(2) and etoposide 160 mg/m(2) on Days 1-3 with standard doses of doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. Increasing the dose of G-CSF from 200 microg/m(2) to 400 microg/m(2) did not allow for further dose escalation. The primary toxicity in all cohorts was neutropenia. Four toxic deaths occurred on CALGB 8852. The 5-year failure free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for eligible patients on CALGB 8852 were 31% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 23--39) and 48% (95%CI, 40--57), respectively. The 5-year FFS and OS rates for eligible patients on CALGB 8854 were 34% (95%CI, 17--52) and 51% (95%CI, 33--70), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate dose escalation with G-CSF is feasible. However, response and survival rates of patients who receive dose-escalated CHOPE, even with the addition of G-CSF, appear similar to the rates reported with standard-dose CHOP.

Biodistribution and dosimetry results from a phase III prospectively randomized controlled trial of Zevalin radioimmunotherapy for low-grade, follicular, or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

UNLABELLED: Radiation dosimetry studies were performed in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treated with 90Y Zevalin (90yttrium ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-Y2B8) on a Phase III open-label prospectively randomized multicenter trial. The trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 90Y Zevalin radioimmunotherapy compared to rituximab (Rituxan, MabThera) immunotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade, follicular, or transformed NHL. An important secondary objective was to determine if radiation dosimetry prior to 90Y Zevalin administration is required for safe treatment in this patient population. METHODS: Patients randomized into the Zevalin arm were given a tracer dose of 5 mCi (185 MBq) (111)In Zevalin (111indium ibritumomab tiuxetan) on Day 0, evaluated with dosimetry, and then administered a therapeutic dose of 0.4 mCi/kg (15 MBq/kg) 90Y Zevalin on Day 7. Both Zevalin doses were preceded by an infusion of 250 mg/m(2) rituximab to clear peripheral B-cells and improve Zevalin biodistribution. Following administration of (111)In Zevalin, serial anterior and posterior whole-body scans were acquired and blood samples were obtained. Residence times for 90Y were estimated for major organs, and the MIRDOSE3 computer software program was used to calculate organ-specific and total body radiation absorbed dose. Patients randomized into the rituximab arm received a standard course of rituximab immunotherapy (375 mg/m(2) weekly x 4). RESULTS: In a prospectively defined 90 patient interim analysis, the overall response rate was 80% for Zevalin vs. 44% for rituximab. For all patients with Zevalin dosimetry data (N=72), radiation absorbed doses were estimated to be below the protocol-defined upper limits of 300 cGy to red marrow and 2000 cGy to normal organs. The median estimated radiation absorbed doses were 71 cGy to red marrow (range: 18-221 cGy), 216 cGy to lungs (94-457 cGy), 532 cGy to liver (range: 234-1856 cGy), 848 cGy to spleen (range: 76-1902 cGy), 15 cGy to kidneys (0.27-76 cGy) and 1484 cGy to tumor (range: 61-24274 cGy). Toxicity was primarily hematologic, transient, and reversible. The severity of hematologic nadir did not correlate with estimates of effective half-life (half-life) or residence time of 90Y in blood, or radiation absorbed dose to the red marrow or total body. CONCLUSION: 90Y Zevalin administered to NHL patients at non-myeloablative maximum tolerated doses delivers acceptable radiation absorbed doses to uninvolved organs. Lack of correlation between dosimetric or pharmacokinetic parameters and the severity of hematologic nadir suggest that hematologic toxicity is more dependent on bone marrow reserve in this heavily pre-treated population. Based on these findings, it is safe to administer 90Y Zevalin in this defined patient population without pre-treatment (111)In-based radiation dosimetry.

Cyclin D1 as an aid in the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma in skin biopsies: a case report.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an uncommon and aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, typically involves lymph nodes. It usually only secondarily involves extranodal sites. We describe an unusual case of a MCL that presented and relapsed in the earlobes. Light microscopic findings were initially regarded as suggestive of small lymphocytic lymphoma, although subsequent analysis of fresh tissue by flow cytometry led to the diagnosis of MCL. Retrospective application of a broad panel of recently developed markers suitable for analysis of routinely processed tissue yielded results that also permitted a diagnosis of MCL. If these results had been available at the time of initial presentation, they would have obviated the need for rebiopsy. Greater awareness not only of the phenotypic criteria by which lymphomas are classified but of the lymphoma markers available for evaluation of routinely processed tissue should facilitate the accurate diagnosis of diseases like MCL and minimize the risk of misdiagnosis as an indolent disorder.

Hodgkin's disease: prognostic factors and short-course regimens.

Both topics discussed in this review, prognostic factors and short-course regimens for Hodgkin's disease, have been the focus of recent research with the goal of developing tools and treatments that will result in the highest cure rates with the least long-term sequelae. A new "prognostic score" for advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease and several potential prognostic factors, including soluble CD30, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, activated cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, and Epstein-Barr virus, are discussed. Preliminary reports of short-course chemotherapy regimens with and without radiotherapy for all stages of Hodgkin's disease are summarized.

Assessment of the stanford V regimen and consolidative radiotherapy for bulky and advanced Hodgkin's disease: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group pilot study E1492.

PURPOSE: This study was performed, in a multi-institutional setting, to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of the Stanford V chemotherapy regimen plus radiotherapy to bulky Hodgkin's disease sites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A two-stage design was implemented in a phase II study involving 47 patients with bulky mediastinal stage I/II or stage III/IV Hodgkin's disease. Twelve weeks of the Stanford V chemotherapy regimen were given with consolidative radiotherapy (36 Gy) to lymph nodes >/= 5 cm and/or macroscopic splenic disease. Treatment was administered in one of five institutions participating in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 45 patients are alive and 40 have been continuously disease-free. The estimated freedom from progression was 87% at 2 years and 85% at 5 years. Overall survival was 96% at 2 and 5 years. There was one death from Hodgkin's disease and one death from an M5 acute leukemia. Six of seven relapsed patients received high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation. The freedom from second progression for the seven relapsed patients was estimated at 98% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Stanford V chemotherapy and consolidative radiotherapy to bulky disease is effective in bulky and advanced Hodgkin's disease in a multi-institutional setting. On this basis, an Intergroup study comparing doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine with the Stanford V regimen has been initiated.

Treatment advances in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) encompass a heterogeneous group of lymphoid malignancies with varying natural histories and prognoses. Recent classifications for NHL have defined distinct lymphoma entities based on morphology, immunophenotype, genetic features, clonal cell lineage and clinical features. These new, more precise classifications and characterizations of NHL will be essential in developing new targeted therapies. However, for this brief review, we will continue describe NHL primarily as indolent or aggressive. Treatment options for patients with indolent, but generally incurable, lymphomas include a 'watch and wait' approach, single agent alkylators, nucleoside analogues, combination chemotherapy, immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies, or interferon (IFN). Vaccine therapy for indolent lymphomas is currently under intense investigation. For aggressive lymphomas, combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care. Major advances in the management of aggressive lymphomas include validation of the international prognostic index and clarification of the role of high-dose therapy with bone marrow or stem cell transplant in patients with relapsed aggressive lymphomas. Multiple randomised pilot trials of high dose therapy as initial therapy for aggressive lymphomas have shown conflicting results and await confirmatory studies.

T-small lymphocyte disorders.

Less than 2% of all lymphoproliferative diseases are indolent or small T-cell disorders, and include T-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL), large granular lymphocyte (LGL) leukemia, and mycosis fungoides (MF). T-PLL has an aggressive clinical course characterized by high lymphocyte counts, marked hepatosplenomegaly, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and median survival times less than 1 year. The majority of cases are associated with abnormalities of chromosome 14. T-CLL probably represents a small cell variant of T-PLL with a similar aggressive course and similar cytogenetics. T-LGL leukemia is a clonal disorder of CD3+, cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Common clinical features include neutropenia, anemia, splenomegaly, and recurrent bacterial infections. The prognosis is dictated by the severity of the neutropenia, with 10-year actuarial survival rates greater than 80%, and most deaths related to sepsis. A small subset of LGL leukemias have a natural killer (NK) phenotype, are refractory to treatment, and result in multiorgan failure and death in a few months. Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common of the small T-cell disorders, is a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with a chronic course, often extending over decades, with most patients eventually succumbing to infection. The small T-lymphocyte disorders represent a rare, diverse group of diseases, which generally have an indolent course, but are not curable.

Splenic pathology in myelodysplasia: a report of 13 cases with clinical correlation.

Splenomegaly is uncommon in myelodysplasia (MDS) and, although cytopenias may be severe, therapeutic splenectomy is rarely performed. We report the histologic, histochemical, and immunophenotypic findings of nine cases of surgical splenectomy and four postmortem spleens from MDS patients. Four histologic patterns were identified: one dominated by erythrophagocytosis, one characterized by red pulp plasmacytosis, one with extramedullary hematopoiesis as the only salient finding, and one with marked red pulp expansion caused by a monocytic proliferation. Wright-Giemsa and histochemical stains were performed on touch preparations in three cases and played a critical role in the precise subclassification of one MDS patient's hematologic disorder, which ultimately proved to be chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Splenectomy led to sustained improvement of cytopenias in three cases, but did not eliminate transfusion dependence for the remaining patients. Three splenectomy cases exhibited clustered Leder-negative mononuclear elements: two of these patients experienced disease progression to refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation or acute myelogenous leukemia during post-splenectomy follow-up, whereas none of the three splenectomy patients without clustered mononuclear elements did. We conclude that splenomegaly in MDS usually reflects the sequelae of dyspoiesis rather than evidence of a proliferative phase, that clustering of Leder-negative large cells may correlate with either a substantial monocytic component or, possibly, increased risk of disease progression, and that the spleen can provide diagnostic as well as prognostic information in MDS patients with splenomegaly.

Bone marrow staging in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is flow cytometry a useful test?

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow often is used as an adjunct to morphologic evaluation in the staging of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The goal of this study was to define objectively the benefit of flow cytometry in this setting. METHODS: The authors reviewed retrospectively all bone marrow specimens submitted between January 1992 and December 1994 to the Washington University Department of Pathology for flow cytometric immunophenotyping to rule out NHL. Results of morphologic examination and flow cytometry were reviewed independently and the ability to detect bone marrow involvement compared. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-three bone marrow specimens from 190 patients with an established diagnosis of NHL were submitted for flow cytometric analysis at initial presentation, restaging, and/or recurrence. Morphologic evaluation was negative in 69%, positive in 23%, and equivocal in 8%. Flow cytometry was negative in all but 1 morphologically negative bone marrow specimens and 40% of morphologically involved bone marrow specimens. Two of 23 morphologically equivocal bone marrow specimens were positive by flow cytometry. An additional 86 specimens were obtained to rule out NHL in patients without an established diagnosis of NHL. The majority of patients had a history of human immunodeficiency virus infection, cytopenia, or unexplained fevers. Morphologically, one specimen was involved with NHL, 5 were equivocal, and 80 were negative. All specimens were negative by flow cytometry. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, flow cytometric analysis improved the detection of NHL in bone marrow in only 3 of 273 samples, 2 of which were suspicious morphologically. Flow cytometry of bone marrow aspirates has a limited role in the routine staging and follow-up of patients with an established diagnosis of NHL.

Treatment of aggressive histology lymphoma.

The recent phase III intergroup trial showed no improvement in outcome with the use of second- and third-generation regimens for primary treatment of aggressive lymphomas. Efforts are now underway to significantly intensify therapies for patients with high-risk aggressive lymphoma by utilizing hematopoietic growth factors or autologous peripheral blood stem cells. Preliminary results show minimal or no benefit to intensification of standard regimens using growth factor support alone. However, high-risk patients who achieve a complete remission with standard therapy appear to benefit from consolidative bone marrow transplantation. Results of a novel, dose-intense regimen, which administers several non-cross-resistant drugs as high-dose single agents in rapid succession, may provide a promising alternative for primary therapy of high-risk aggressive lymphoma. New regimens incorporating high-dose cytarabine for patients with poor prognosis, small noncleaved-cell lymphoma seem to improve survival. The ability to effectively tailor therapy for subgroups of patients with aggressive lymphoma depends on the continued identification of clinical and biologic prognostic factors to compliment the International Prognostic Factors Index.

Assessment of knowledge about cancer pain management by physicians in training.

This survey assessed the knowledge of physicians in training about the pharmacology of opioid analgesics and the benefits of palliative radiation therapy in the management of cancer pain. Eighty-one trainees at the Washington University Medical Center completed a questionnaire that addressed the palliative care of a hypothetical patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The questions addressed were 1) opioid selection, 2) conversion of parenteral to oral morphine, 3) management of opioid toxicities, 4) opioid addiction, and 5) efficacy of radiation therapy. The results demonstrated that few physicians in training were familiar with the stepwise progression of analgesic selection outlined in the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. When asked to convert a parenteral dose of morphine to an equivalent dose of a controlled-release preparation, 75% calculated a dose that was less than one-third the correct dose; only four (5%) calculated the dose correctly. Trainees were familiar with the management of opioid toxicities. They were unfamiliar with the palliative benefits of radiation therapy. Although 41% recognized that complete relief of pain could be achieved in 50%-60% of patients, most (70%) predicted that maximum pain relief would be seen within the first month, and 98% predicted maximum benefit by 12 weeks. Although cancer pain management has been highlighted in the lay and medical literature, physicians in training still demonstrate deficiencies in their knowledge about the pharmacology and bioequivalency of the opioid and the benefits of radiation therapy. Published guidelines for the management of cancer pain need to be disseminated to all medical personnel caring for patients with cancer.