Organic dust exposure increases mast cell tryptase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and airway epithelium of heaves horses.

BACKGROUND: Mast cell degranulation is believed to act as a key event in initiating and maintaining airway response to allergen challenge in human asthma. It is hypothesized that the mast cell may play a similar role in equine heaves, which shares many similarities with occupational dust-induced asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify the mast cell proteinase tryptase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from control and heaves-susceptible horses and to investigate tryptase mRNA and protein expression in pulmonary mast cells. METHODS: Equine BALF tryptase concentrations were determined by ELISA from control and heaves-susceptible horses pre and post 24 h hay/straw challenge (HSC). Tryptase mRNA and protein expression were investigated by quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry in bronchial and bronchiolar tissue samples of control and heaves-susceptible horses. RESULTS: Both control and heaves-susceptible horses had significantly increased BALF tryptase concentrations following HSC (P=0.003 and 0.034, respectively). Increased numbers of tryptase-expressing intra-epithelial mast cells were demonstrated in heaves horses, but not controls, following challenge (P=0.02). Bronchiolar tissue from heaves horses removed from challenge contained significantly lower tryptase transcripts than that from control horses (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Mast cell degranulation and tryptase release into the airways occur following HSC of control and heaves-susceptible horses. The greater number of mast cells available in the bronchiolar epithelium of heaves horses may be clinically significant in the pulmonary inflammatory response of heaves.

The effect of bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve anaesthesia on swallowing in horses.

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Dysfunction of the glossopharyngeal nerve has been implicated as a cause of dysphagia in horses. However, recent studies have indicated that this is not the case. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve anaesthesia would cause dysphagia in horses or result in measurable alterations in the timing, function, or sequence of swallowing. METHODS: Swallowing was evaluated in 6 normal horses with and without bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve anaesthesia. Swallowing dynamics were assessed subjectively and objectively based on time from prehension of food until swallowing, number of tongue movements until initiation of swallowing, depth of bolus at the base of the tongue prior to initiation of swallow and evidence of tracheal aspiration using fluoroscopy and endoscopy. RESULTS: There was no evidence of aspiration or dysphagia in horses before or after bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve block. No observed or measured differences in swallowing sequence or function could be detected in blocked compared to unblocked horses. However, there was a trend in blocked horses for the number of tongue pushes and the time to swallowing to be increased. CONCLUSIONS: Glossopharyngeal nerve function may not be essential for normal swallowing function in otherwise healthy horses. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: Clinically, normal swallowing is not an appropriate test of glossopharyngeal nerve function and dysphagic horses should not be assumed to have glossopharyngeal nerve dysfunction.