Optimizing tacrolimus therapy in the maintenance of renal allografts: 12-month results.

BACKGROUND: The determination of optimal tacrolimus (TAC) trough levels is needed to prevent adverse effects of calcineurin inhibitors. METHODS: Stable transplant recipients currently receiving cyclosporine (CsA) were assigned randomly (1:1:1) to continue CsA (target trough level of 50-250 ng/mL); or convert to "reduced" TAC (target trough level 3.0-5.9 ng/mL) or "standard" TAC (target trough level 6.0-8.9 ng/mL). RESULTS: At 12 months, there was a significant improvement in renal function in the reduced TAC versus CsA group with lower serum creatinine (P=0.004) and cystatin C (P<0.001), and higher estimated creatinine clearance (P=0.017). However, there were no statistically significant differences in any renal parameter in the standard TAC versus CsA group. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly reduced in both TAC groups versus the CsA group (P<0.001). Patient and graft survival and episodes of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection were similar for all treatment groups, and no statistically significant differences were observed between groups in the incidence of new-onset diabetes or cardiac conditions, or in the prevalence of hyperglycemia, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia among patients who did not have these conditions at baseline. Alopecia developed more commonly among TAC-treated patients than CsA-treated patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CsA continuation, conversion to reduced TAC target trough concentrations resulted in significantly improved renal function without increasing the risk of rejection. Conversion to TAC, regardless of target concentration, resulted in improved serum lipid profiles in kidney transplant recipients at 12 months.

Prospective, randomized trial of the effect of antibody induction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: three-year results.

BACKGROUND: Historically, antibody induction has been used because of the higher immunologic risk of graft loss or rejection observed in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation compared with kidney transplantation alone. This trial was designed to assess the effect of antibody induction in SPK transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Induction agents included T-cell-depleting and interleukin-2 receptor antibodies. METHODS: A total of 174 SPK transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective, open-label, multi-center study. They were randomized to induction (n=87) or non-induction (n=87) groups and followed for 3 years. RESULTS: At 3 years, actual patient (94.3% and 89.7%) and pancreas (75.9% and 75.9%) survivals were similar between the induction and non-induction groups, respectively. Actual kidney survival was similar at 1 and 2 years, but at 3 years, it was significantly better in the induction group compared with the non-induction group (92% vs. 81.6%; P =0.04). At 3 years, median serum creatinine and hemoglobin A1C were similar between the induction and non-induction groups (1.35 mg/dL and 1.20 mg/dL, 5.4% and 5.5%, respectively). Three-year cumulative incidence of biopsy-confirmed, treated acute kidney rejection in the induction and non-induction groups was 19.5% and 27.5% (P =0.14), respectively, with odds 4.6 times greater in African Americans regardless of treatment (P =0.004). Significantly higher rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and CMV syndrome occurred in those receiving T-cell-depleting antibody induction (36.1%) when compared with those receiving anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (2%) and non-induction (8.1%) (P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids resulted in excellent safety and efficacy in SPK transplant recipients. Actual 3-year kidney survival was significantly better in the induction group; however, CMV viremia and CMV syndrome rates were significantly higher in the T-cell-depleting antibody group. African Americans demonstrated a significantly greater risk of acute rejection despite antibody induction. Decisions regarding the use of induction therapy must weigh the risk of kidney graft loss or rejection against the risk of infection.