Sustainable development in general practice.

BACKGROUND: As health care accounts for 4-5% of global carbon emissions, many health organisations have called for implementing sustainable development actions in health care. However, sustainable development measures in general practice are rarely implemented by physicians. The aim of this study was to explore the practices of general practitioners (GPs) in terms of sustainable development to identify which actions are appropriate and achievable. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in 12 French GPs using face-to-face or telephone interviews, transcribed verbatim and analysed through a global inductive analysis with constant comparison. Semi-structured interviews were focussed on waste management, relationships between health professionals, sustainable development, and GPs' activity. RESULTS: The mean age of the GPs was 42.8 years and they mainly worked in an urban environment. The interviews highlighted 4 themes. It appeared that a balance needs to be found between the environmental impact and the constraints related to medical care. To be able to think about integrating sustainable development into health care, GPs should make a personal commitment to change their routine. In practice, consumption should be reassessed, prescriptions and prevention reconsidered. These actions could be applied to the GPs' environment as role models for their patients, business leaders, and members of the healthcare system. CONCLUSION: GPs felt concerned by sustainable development and were already involved in its implementation in their practice. Tools are available to help GPs to continue to implement their actions described in this article, but their impact remains to be investigated.

In an era where global health is an increasing concern for the population, it appeared necessary to study the extent to which health professionals were willing to change their behaviours in their professional lives. This study was based on the interview of 12 French general practitioners and investigated their perspective on sustainable development and how they implemented it in their practice. Four main themes were highlighted. Some physicians did not spontaneously see the link between their practice and sustainable development. Our study showed that they were willing to adapt their practice despite organisational constraints and the difficulty in changing their behaviour.

From qualitative data to GP training on CRC screening.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. In France, although mass screening has been performed using the guaiac fecal occult blood test since 2008, the participation rate remains too low. Previous studies have explored the perspectives of doctors and patients as well as the performance of general practitioners (GPs) by recording and analyzing consultations in which patients came and asked for fecal occult blood test. Results indicated that improvement was needed in patient-centered communication. This research aims to develop educational material and training programs for GPs in order to enhance their communication with patients on CRC screening, based on data from two qualitative studies. Triangulation of all qualitative data was performed and discussed with communication experts in order to develop educational material and training programs based on the patient-centered clinical method. Two different scenarios were developed to improve communication with patients: one for a compliant patient and another for a noncompliant patient. Two videos were made featuring a doctor and a simulated patient. A two-sequence training program was built, including role-playing and presentation of the video followed by a discussion. The qualitative data helped us to produce a useful, relevant training program for GPs on CRC screening.

Development and description of measurement properties of an instrument to assess treatment burden among patients with multiple chronic conditions.

BACKGROUND: Patients experience an increasing treatment burden related to everything they do to take care of their health: visits to the doctor, medical tests, treatment management and lifestyle changes. This treatment burden could affect treatment adherence, quality of life and outcomes. We aimed to develop and validate an instrument for measuring treatment burden for patients with multiple chronic conditions. METHODS: Items were derived from a literature review and qualitative semistructured interviews with patients. The instrument was then validated in a sample of patients with chronic conditions recruited in hospitals and general practitioner clinics in France. Factor analysis was used to examine the questionnaire structure. Construct validity was studied by the relationships between the instrument's global score, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) scores and the complexity of treatment as assessed by patients and physicians. Agreement between patients and physicians was appraised. Reliability was determined by a test-retest method. RESULTS: A sample of 502 patients completed the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ), which consisted of 7 items (2 of which had 4 subitems) defined after 22 interviews with patients. The questionnaire showed a unidimensional structure. The Cronbach's α was 0.89. The instrument's global score was negatively correlated with TSQM scores (rs = -0.41 to -0.53) and positively correlated with the complexity of treatment (rs = 0.16 to 0.40). Agreement between patients and physicians (n = 396) was weak (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.47)). Reliability of the retest (n = 211 patients) was 0.76 (0.67 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first valid and reliable instrument assessing the treatment burden for patients across any disease or treatment context. This instrument could help in the development of treatment strategies that are both efficient and acceptable for patients.