Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anesth Analg ; 90(5): 1208-12, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10781481

ABSTRACT

We compared the effects of an IV administration of chloroprocaine and lidocaine on circulatory responses associated with endotracheal intubation. Thirty patients were randomly allocated to receive normal saline (placebo), lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg), or preservative-free chloroprocaine (4.5 mg/kg) 45 s before endotracheal intubation. Blood pressures and heart rate and rhythm were recorded before laryngoscopy and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 5 min after intubation. Blood samples were analyzed for catecholamine and chloroprocaine concentrations. Chloroprocaine reduced increases in blood pressure in response to intubation when compared with patients receiving normal saline and lidocaine. Systolic blood pressures at 0.5 and 1 min after intubation were significantly lower in the chloroprocaine group when compared with both the control and lidocaine groups (P < 0.05). Diastolic and mean blood pressures were significantly lower in the chloroprocaine group at all time points until 5 min after intubation (P < 0.05). Chloroprocaine and, to a lesser degree, lidocaine, produced marked attenuation of intubation-induced increases in plasma concentration of epinephrine and norepinephrine. Plasma concentrations of norepinephrine were significantly smaller in the chloroprocaine group at 0.5, 1, and 1.5 min, and plasma concentrations of epinephrine were significantly smaller at 0.5 after intubation when compared with control and lidocaine groups (P < 0.05). Measurable concentrations of chloroprocaine were recorded in plasma samples for 2 min after its administration. No adverse chloroprocaine effects (i.e., circulatory disturbances, venous irritation) were detected. The IV administration of chloroprocaine effectively blunted cardiovascular response produced by laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, and this effect was more pronounced when compared with IV lidocaine.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Laryngoscopy/adverse effects , Procaine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Epinephrine/blood , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Norepinephrine/blood , Procaine/administration & dosage
3.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 16(2): 95-105, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12578066

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Develop and test methods for representing and classifying breath sounds in an intensive care setting. METHODS: Breath sounds were recorded over the bronchial regions of the chest. The breath sounds were represented by their averaged power spectral density, summed into feature vectors across the frequency spectrum from 0 to 800 Hertz. The sounds were segmented by individual breath and each breath was divided into inspiratory and expiratory segments. Sounds were classified as normal or abnormal. Different back-propagation neural network configurations were evaluated. The number of input features, hidden units, and hidden layers were varied. RESULTS: 2127 individual breath sounds from the ICU patients and 321 breaths from training tapes were obtained. Best overall classification rate for the ICU breath sounds was 73% with 62% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Best overall classification rate for the training tapes was 91% with 87% sensitivity and 95% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Long term monitoring of lung sounds is not feasible unless several barriers can be overcome. Several choices in signal representation and neural network design greatly improved the classification rates of breath sounds. The analysis of transmitted sounds from the trachea to the lung is suggested as an area for future study.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Monitoring, Physiologic , Neural Networks, Computer , Respiratory Sounds/classification , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Sounds/etiology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
4.
Neurosurgery ; 43(3): 514-26; discussion 527-8, 1998 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9733307

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Several causes of spatial inaccuracies in image-guided surgery have been carefully studied and documented for several systems. These include error in identifying the external features used for registration, geometrical distortion in the preoperative images, and error in tracking the surgical instruments. Another potentially important source of error is brain deformation between the time of imaging and the time of surgery or during surgery. In this study, we measured the deformation of the dura and brain surfaces between the time of imaging and the start of surgical resection for 21 patients. METHODS: All patients underwent intraoperative functional mapping, allowing us to measure brain surface motion at two times that were separated by nearly an hour after opening the dura but before performing resection. The positions of the dura and brain surfaces were recorded and transformed to the coordinate space of a preoperative magnetic resonance image, using the Acustar surgical navigation system (manufactured by Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc., Randolph, MA) (the Acustar trademark and associated intellectual property rights are now owned by Picker International, Highland Heights, OH). This system performs image registration with bone-implanted markers and tracks a surgical probe by optical triangulation. RESULTS: The mean displacements of the dura and the first and second brain surfaces were 1.2, 4.4, and 5.6 mm, respectively, with corresponding mean volume reductions under the craniotomy of 6, 22, and 29 cc. The maximum displacement was greater than 10 mm in approximately one-third of the patients for the first brain surface measurement and one-half of the patients for the second. In all cases, the direction of brain shift corresponded to a "sinking" of the brain intraoperatively, compared with its preoperative position. Analysis of the measurement error revealed that its magnitude was approximately 1 to 2 mm. We observed two different patterns of the brain surface deformation field, depending on the inclination of the craniotomy with respect to gravity. Separate measurements of brain deformation within the closed cranium caused by changes in patient head orientation with respect to gravity suggested that less than 1 mm of the brain shift recorded intraoperatively could have resulted from the change in patient orientation between the time of imaging and the time of surgery. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that intraoperative brain deformation is an important source of error that needs to be considered when using surgical navigation systems.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Brain/surgery , Craniotomy , Motion , Adult , Aged , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/pathology , Dura Mater/diagnostic imaging , Dura Mater/pathology , Dura Mater/physiopathology , Dura Mater/surgery , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Prone Position , Supine Position , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...