The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is evolving interest in auditing and credentialling the performance of surgeons. The incidence of anastomotic leakage has been proposed as a measure of performance following colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing resections of the colon and rectum. METHODS: A prospective database was developed for all patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Anastomotic leakage was defined prior to the commencement of the study. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of leakage. The variables analysed included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, anatomical location, pathology, emergency surgery, type of anastomosis, a covering stoma and radiotherapy. Significance was defined as the probability of a type 1 error of < 5%. The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: There were 1598 patients who underwent 1639 anastomoses. Their mean age was 63 years, 34% of patients were ASA 3 or 4, and 16% of the operations were emergencies. Anastomotic leaks occurred in 2.4% (40/1639) of anastomoses. The leak rate for intraperitoneal anastomoses was 1.5% (19/1283) vs 6.6% for extraperitoneal anastomoses (21/316). Half of these leaks (20/40) were managed with re-operation or percutaneous drainage procedures. Ultra-low anterior resections were associated with the highest leak rate (8%, 18/225). A logistic regression analysis identified a covering stoma (P = 0.0001, OR 5.078, 95% CI 2.527-10.23) and diverticular disease (P = 0.037, OR 2.304, 95% CI 1.053-5.042) as independent predictors of a leak. CONCLUSIONS: Within this surgical unit, the incidence of leaks from intraabdominal anastomoses was relatively low. However, leaks in patients undergoing extraperitoneal anastomoses continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality.

Randomized clinical trial of bowel preparation with a single phosphate enema or polyethylene glycol before elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: A recent meta-analysis has questioned the value of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colorectal resection. The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate whether a single phosphate enema was as effective as oral polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution in preventing anastomotic leakage. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either a single phosphate enema or 3 litres of oral PEG solution before surgery. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks to detect anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: There were 147 patients in each group and the groups were evenly matched for putative risk factors at baseline. Patients in the enema group had more anastomotic leaks requiring reoperation than those in the PEG group (4.1 versus 0 per cent, P = 0.013; relative risk 2.04 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.82 to 2.30)). The mortality rate was higher in the PEG group (2.7 versus 0.7 per cent, P = 0.176; odds ratio 1.62 (95 per cent c.i. 0.45 to 36.98)). CONCLUSION: Bowel preparation with a phosphate enema was associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation compared with oral PEG. These results do not support the routine use of a phosphate enema in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Case report: adenocarcinoma arising in a Crohn's stricture of the jejunum.

Patients with Crohn's disease affecting the small intestine appear to have an increased risk of developing adenocarcinoma. However, it remains an uncommon complication of an uncommon disease. The diagnosis is difficult to make both pre- and intra-operatively, and is most commonly made postoperatively on histopathology. Hence, at laparotomy, consideration should be given to performing a frozen section on all small bowel strictures due to Crohn's disease to define the presence of dysplasia or cancer. This will assist the surgeon in deciding whether to perform a stricturoplasty or a resection.

Fistula-in-ano: a prospective study of 107 patients.

BACKGROUND: While the majority of fistulas-in-ano are anatomically simple and easy to treat, a significant number are high or anatomically complex and have the potential to become a major management problem. METHODS: One hundred and seven consecutive patients undergoing surgery for fistula-in-ano were studied prospectively with standardized anatomic diagrams. RESULTS: Fistulas were classified as superficial (15%), intersphincteric (43%), trans-sphincteric (35%) or 'high' (7%). Within each group fistulas were considered either simple or complex (high tracks, extra tracks or other complications). Trans-sphincteric fistulas were more often complex than intersphincteric fistulas (32 vs 6%). A prior history of perianal sepsis and surgery was more frequent among the trans-sphincteric and 'high' groups. An external fistula opening within a narrow are 30 degrees either side of the posterior midline was almost always associated with a simple superficial or intersphincteric fistula (97%). Anterior and especially posterolaterally located external openings were frequently associated with complex fistulas (16 and 47%, respectively) and often had trans-sphincteric or 'high' tracks (58 and 56%). Goodsall's Law was more accurate for posterior (91%) and intersphincteric (93%) fistulas than for anterior (69%) and trans-sphincteric (68%) fistulas. Histopathology of fistula material showed unremarkable fistula-in-ano in 87% of requests. Six patients had unexpected abnormal results, including three new diagnoses of Crohn's disease. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of additional anatomic complexity should always be anticipated in trans-sphincteric fistulas. Trans-sphincteric and 'high' fistulas are more likely to occur in females, and in patients with previous perianal sepsis or surgery for fistula. External openings close to the posterior midline almost always underlie simple fistulas, whereas posterolateral external openings are predictive of complex fistulas.