Convex Instrumented Hemiepiphysiodesis With Concave Distraction: A Treatment Option for Long Sweeping Congenital Curves.

BACKGROUND: Convex hemiepiphysiodesis has been reported to have mixed results in the treatment of congenital spine deformities. Multiple modifications of the original technique were suggested to improve the results. The purpose of this study is to report the results and complications of an instrumented convex growth arrest procedure modified with concave distraction. METHODS: The records of 11 patients with long sweeping congenital curves (involving multiple anomalous vertebrae) who underwent convex instrumented hemiepiphysiodesis with concave distraction were evaluated. Mean age at index operation was 58 months (range, 29 to 101 mo). Lengthening of the concave distraction rod was done every 6 months. The magnitude of coronal/sagittal deformity and T1-T12 height were measured on the preoperative, postoperative, and latest follow-up radiographs. Average follow-up was 44.9 months (range, 24 to 89 mo). RESULTS: In the coronal plane, the convex hemiepiphysiodesis segment was corrected from an average of 60.5 to 40.4 degrees postoperatively and further improved to 35.5 degrees at the latest follow-up. The distracted segment was corrected from 33.4 to 15.2 degrees postoperatively and to 12.7 degrees at the latest follow-up. Sagittal plane alignment was minimally affected. The average T1-T12 height was 157.1 mm in the early postoperative period and 181.1 mm at last follow-up. During follow-up, we identified partial pull-out of screws on the distraction side in 5 of the 11 patients and rod breakages in 3 patients. These were revised during planned lengthenings. There were no unplanned surgeries, deep wound infections, nor neurological complications. CONCLUSIONS: Convex instrumented hemiepiphysiodesis with concave distraction resulted in good curve correction while maintaining the growth of thorax. The correction of the anomalous segment improved over time, proving the effectiveness of the hemiepiphysiodesis. Addition of a concave distraction construct appears to enhance spinal growth, thereby augmenting the hemiepiphysiodesis effect.

Safety and Efficacy of Apical Resection Following Growth-friendly Instrumentation in Myelomeningocele Patients With Gibbus: Growing Rod Versus Luque Trolley.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracolumbar/lumbar kyphosis in myelomeningocele patients is a common and severely debilitating condition, amenable only to surgical correction. Several surgical techniques have been proposed. Growth-friendly techniques should be preferred in this patient population due to an already compromised trunk height. The growing rod (GR) and Luque trolley (LT) with Galveston instrumentation are well-known growth-friendly techniques. We compared results and complications in 2 groups of patients who have undergone kyphectomy and fixation, either with the GR (group 1) or the LT with Galveston pelvic fixation (group 2). METHODS: Ten patients undergoing GR fixation and 5 patients undergoing LT with Fackler fixation following kyphectomy (vertebral column resection or multiple eggshell) were included. GRs were lengthened every 6 months. Unplanned surgery in group 1 was defined as an unscheduled operation due to complication; all subsequent operations in group 2 were considered unplanned. Thoracic and local kyphosis and T1-S1 and T1-12 heights were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age at initial surgery was 6 years and 6.5 years for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Mean age at the last follow-up was 12.5 years for group 1 and 13.1 years for group 2. Mean follow-up was 72.7 months for group 1 and 68.6 months for group 2. Preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up kyphosis angles in that order for group 1 were 72.3 degrees (10 to 110 degrees), 16.9 degrees (-50 to +55 degrees), and 21.6 degrees (-41 to +97 degrees), and for group 2 106.6 degrees (81 to 132 degrees), 15.6 degrees (-37 to +50 degrees), and 19.2 degrees (-42 to +38 degrees), respectively. Postoperative and final follow-up in that order for mean T1-T12 and T1-S1 heights for group 1 were 14 (11.2 to 18.7) cm, 20.4 (19.3 to 25.7) cm and 21 (17.2 to 23.2) cm, 31.6 (23.6 to 41.5) cm. Postoperative and final follow-up in that order for mean T1-T12 and T1-S1 heights for group 2 were 15.9 (14.3 to 19.7) cm, 20.1 (15.5 to 24.6) cm and 24.4 (17.7 to 27.8) cm, 29.5 (25.3 to 31.3) cm. Growth per year was 1.05 and 0.84 cm for groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.297). Fourteen versus 4 unplanned surgeries were performed in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and an additional 4 implant revisions were performed in group 1 during planned lengthenings. CONCLUSIONS: Both the LT and the GR system are reasonable alternatives of fixation postkyphectomy, both of which preserve growth to differing degrees. In this patient population with an already severely stunted trunk height, the surgeon must choose whether the amount of extra growth achieved by the GR is worth the risk of an increased number of surgeries.