Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Indian J Radiol Imaging ; 28(4): 456-459, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30662210

ABSTRACT

Campomelic dysplasia (CD) is a rare form of skeletal dysplasia (incidence 1:200,000 births) which is associated with characteristic phenotypes including bowing of the limbs, a narrow thoracic cage, 11 pairs of ribs, hypoplastic scapulae, macrocephaly, flattened supraorbital ridges and nasal bridge, cleft palate, and micrognathia. In addition to the skeletal abnormalities, hydrocephalus, hydronephrosis, and congenital heart disease have been reported. We describe a preterm neonate who presented with respiratory failure and clinical features of CD. Our case had only 10 pairs of ribs, and to the best of our knowledge this is the first case report of CD with 10 pairs of ribs.

2.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 11(7): SD01-SD03, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28892991

ABSTRACT

Neisseria meningitidis is a rare cause of meningitis and septicemia in neonates. There are few published case reports of neonatal meningococcal meningitis complicated by subdural empyema, cerebral abscess and hydrocephalus. Few cases of neonatal meningococcal meningitis have been reported in the literature with none of them having the complication of multiple cerebral abscesses in early neonatal period (

3.
Afr J Paediatr Surg ; 13(1): 47-9, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27251525

ABSTRACT

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a common developmental anomaly that usually presents in the neonatal period. It is known to be associated with cardiac, renal, genital and chromosomal anomalies. Late presentation of CDH (beyond 1-month of age) is seen in 13% of the cases. Malrotation is reported in 42% of CDH cases. We report a case of a 3-month-old infant with concurrent CDH, Meckel's diverticulum and malrotation. This is the first case report of such an association in an infant.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Abnormalities/surgery , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/surgery , Intestinal Volvulus/surgery , Meckel Diverticulum/surgery , Digestive System Abnormalities/complications , Digestive System Abnormalities/diagnostic imaging , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/complications , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , Intestinal Volvulus/complications , Intestinal Volvulus/diagnostic imaging , Male , Meckel Diverticulum/complications , Meckel Diverticulum/diagnostic imaging
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (6): CD006182, 2011 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21678354

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Standard surgical management of infants with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) is laparotomy with the resection of the necrotic or perforated segments of the intestine. Peritoneal drainage is an alternative approach to the management of such infants. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and risks of peritoneal drainage compared to laparotomy as the initial surgical treatment for perforated NEC or SIP in preterm infants. SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2010), EMBASE (1980 to July 2010), CINAHL (1982 to July 2010), previous reviews and cross-references were searched. Abstracts of paediatric academic society meetings were also searched (online: 2000 to 2009; handsearching Pediatric Research: 1995 to 2000). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials in preterm (< 37 weeks gestation), low birth weight (< 2500 g) infants with perforated NEC or SIP allocated to peritoneal drainage or laparotomy as initial surgical treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were excerpted from the trial reports and analysed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: Only two randomised controlled trials (RCT) met the eligibility criteria. Overall, no significant differences were seen between the peritoneal drainage and laparotomy groups regarding the incidence of mortality within 28 days of the primary procedure (28/90 versus 30/95; typical relative risk (RR) 0.99, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.52; N = 185, two trials); mortality by 90 days after the primary procedure (typical RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.55; N = 185, two trials) and the number of infants needing total parenteral nutrition for more than 90 days (typical RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.95; N = 116, two trials). Nearly 50% of the infants in the peritoneal drainage group could avoid the need for laparotomy during the study period (44/90 versus 95/96; typical RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.61; N = 186, two trials). One study found that the time to attain full enteral feeds in infants ≤ 1000 g was prolonged in the peritoneal drainage group (mean difference (MD) 20.77, 95% CI 3.62 to 37.92). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from two RCTs suggests no significant benefits or harms of peritoneal drainage over laparotomy. However, due to the very small sample size, clinically significant differences may have easily been missed. No firm recommendations can be made for clinicians. Large multicentre randomised controlled trials are needed to address this question definitively.


Subject(s)
Drainage/methods , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/surgery , Infant, Premature, Diseases/surgery , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Drainage/adverse effects , Drainage/mortality , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/mortality , Humans , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Premature, Diseases/mortality , Intestinal Perforation/mortality , Peritoneal Cavity , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...