Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Top Hosp Pharm Manage ; 14(3): 47-57, 1994 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10138928

ABSTRACT

Providing complete and understandable information to patients about medicines is considered an integral component of high-quality medical and pharmaceutical care. With such information, not only can the level of general health increase, but costs associated with noncompliance, including polypharmacy and hospitalization, can decrease. Although patient information leaflets (PILs) have been available since the 1970s, their use is more relevant today because of the counseling requirements of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990. A national survey of community pharmacists was conducted to determine their attitudes toward this patient education strategy. Results demonstrate that pharmacists believe PILs benefit patients, but that PILs need revision in terms of readability, understandability, and standardization.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Community Pharmacy Services/standards , Drug Labeling/standards , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Community Pharmacy Services/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling/standards , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Drug Industry , Drug Labeling/economics , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/psychology , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
2.
Am Pharm ; NS34(8): 48-53, 1994 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7942501

ABSTRACT

As the popularity of self-medication and direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs increases, the quality, availability, and utility of current patient information strategies become key concerns for pharmacists. It has been suggested that patient package inserts (PPIs) are a high-quality source of information for patients. To determine if this is true, 63 PPIs from three types of sources were assessed for readability and design. Suggested readability level is fifth-to-seventh grade. The PPIs studied had, on average, a 10th-grade reading level. Design characteristics, such as type size and paper quality--which affect patients' likelihood of using the PPI and keeping it for reference--were poorest in PPIs produced by pharmaceutical manufacturers. Overall, associations produce the best PPIs, with commercial vendors and pharmaceutical manufacturers following. However, both readability and design evaluations showed that all PPIs need improvement. Design and testing of new PPI formats and a reassessment of readability are recommended.


Subject(s)
Drug Labeling/standards , Drug Prescriptions , Equipment Design , Humans , Pharmacists , Reading , Self Medication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...