Cholecystokinin CCK2 receptors mediate the peptide's inhibitory actions on the contractile activity of human distal colon via the nitric oxide pathway.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cholecystokinin is known to exert stimulant actions on intestinal motility via activation of type 1 cholecystokinin receptors (CCK(1)). However, the role played by cholecystokinin 2 (CCK(2)) receptors in the regulation of gut motility remains undetermined. This study was designed to examine the influence of CCK(2) receptors on the contractile activity of human distal colon. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of compounds acting on CCK(2) receptors were assessed in vitro on motor activity of longitudinal smooth muscle, under basal conditions as well as in the presence of KCl-induced contractions or transmural electrical stimulation. KEY RESULTS: Cholecystokinin octapeptide sulphate induced concentration-dependent contractions which were enhanced by GV150013 (CCK(2) receptor antagonist; +57% at 0.01 microM). These effects were unaffected by tetrodotoxin. The enhancing actions of GV150013 on contractions evoked by cholecystokinin octapeptide sulphate were unaffected by N(omega)-propyl-L-arginine (NPA, neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor), while they were prevented by N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME, non-selective nitric oxide synthase inhibitor). In the presence of KCl-induced contractions, cholecystokinin octapeptide sulphate elicited concentration-dependent relaxations (-36%), which were unaffected by NPA, but were counteracted by GV150013 or L-NAME. The application of electrical stimuli evoked phasic contractions which were enhanced by GV150013 (+41 % at 0.01 microM). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CCK(2) receptors mediate inhibitory actions of cholecystokinin on motor activity of human distal colon. It is suggested that CCK(2) receptors exert their modulating actions through a nitric oxide pathway, independent of the activity of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase isoform.

Interaction between piroxicam and azithromycin during distribution to human periodontal tissues.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics are important in the prevention of infections and pain associated with periodontal surgery as well as in the adjunctive therapy of periodontal disease. In this study, patients undergoing oral surgery were treated with piroxicam and azithromycin to examine the interactions of these drugs on periodontal tissues. METHODS: Sixty-six patients were assigned to 3 groups and treated for 3 days as follows: 1) piroxicam 20 mg/day; 2) azithromycin 500 mg/day; or 3) piroxicam 20 mg/day plus azithromycin 500 mg/day. Samples of blood, saliva, gingiva, and alveolar bone were collected during surgery and at days 0.5, 2.5, 4.5, and 6.5 after last dose. Piroxicam concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography and azithromycin concentrations by microbiological assay. RESULTS: In patients treated with piroxicam alone, the highest drug concentrations were found in plasma at each time point, but consistent piroxicam levels were also detected in gingival samples up to 4.5 days. The combined treatment with piroxicam plus azithromycin was associated with a reduction of piroxicam concentrations in periodontal tissues. In patients receiving azithromycin alone, high drug levels were measured in periodontal tissues up to 6.5 days. This distribution pattern did not vary in patients treated with piroxicam plus azithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with piroxicam or azithromycin alone ensures a favorable distribution of these drugs into periodontal tissues. However, upon combined administration, azithromycin interferes negatively with the periodontal disposition of piroxicam. This interaction might depend on the displacement of piroxicam from acceptor sites at the level of periodontal tissues.

Characterization of a novel mechanism accounting for the adverse cholinergic effects of the anticancer drug irinotecan.

1. This study investigates the mechanisms accounting for the adverse cholinergic effects of the antitumour drug irinotecan. The activity of irinotecan and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38), was assayed in models suitable for pharmacological studies on cholinergic system. 2. Irinotecan moderately inhibited human or electric eel acetylcholinesterase activity, SN-38 had no effect, whereas physostigmine blocked both the enzymes with high potency and efficacy. 3. Irinotecan and SN-38 did not affect spontaneous or electrically-induced contractile activity of human colonic muscle. Acetylcholine and dimethylphenylpiperazinium (DMPP) caused phasic contractions or relaxations, respectively. Physostigmine enhanced the motor responses elicited by electrical stimulation. 4. Although irinotecan and SN-38 did not modify the basal contractile activity of guinea-pig ileum longitudinal muscle strips, irinotecan 100 microM moderately enhanced cholinergic twitch contractions. Acetylcholine or DMPP caused phasic contractions, whereas physostigmine enhanced the twitch responses. Electrically-induced [(3)H]-acetylcholine release was reduced by irinotecan (100 microM) or physostigmine (0.1 microM). 5. Intravenous irinotecan stimulated gastric acid secretion in rats, but no effects were obtained with SN-38, physostigmine or i.c.v. irinotecan. Hypersecretion induced by irinotecan was partly prevented by ondansetron, and unaffected by capsazepine. In the presence of atropine, vagotomy and systemic or vagal ablation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent fibres, irinotecan did not stimulate gastric secretion. 6. The present results indicate that irinotecan and SN-38 do not act as specific acetylcholinesterase blockers or acetylcholine receptor agonists. It is rather suggested that irinotecan promotes a parasympathetic discharge to peripheral organs, mediated by capsaicin-sensitive vagal afferent fibres, and that serotonin 5-HT(3) receptors are implicated in the genesis of vago-vagal reflex triggered by irinotecan.

Peripheral cholecystokinin A and cholecystokinin B receptors mediate stimulation of gastric pepsinogen and acid secretion following intracerebroventricular injection of cholecystokinin-8-sulphate.

BACKGROUND: Peptides of cholecystokinin family regulate various physiological actions by acting at level of central nervous system. AIMS: To: 1) investigate possible influence of central cholecystokinin pathways on gastric pepsinogen and acid secretions; 2) characterize pharmacological profile and location of cholecystokinin receptor subtypes involved in gastric effects of centrally applied cholecystokinin-8-sulphate (cholecystokinin-8S). METHODS: Urethane-anaesthetized rats were subjected to continuous perfusion of gastric lumen. Pepsin levels in perfusate were determined by enzymatic assay based on spectrophotometric measurement of products generated by peptic digestion of bovine haemoglobin. Acidity was measured by automatic potentiometric titration of hydrogen ions. RESULTS: Following intracerebroventricular injection, cholecystokinin-8S increased both pepsinogen and acid output. In addition, intravenous cholecystokinin-8S stimulated peptic and acid secretions more promptly and at lower doses than after central injection. Stimulant effects of centrally applied cholecystokinin-8S were not affected by intracerebroventricular injection of devazepide (cholecystokinin A receptor antagonist) or L-365,260 (cholecystokinin B receptor antagonist) or by bilateral vagotomy. However, intravenous devazepide partly antagonized pepsigogue action of intracerebroventricular cholecystokinin-8S without affecting its acid hypersecretory effect, whereas after intravenous injection of L-365,260 peptic hypersecretion evoked by intracerebroventricular cholecystokinin-8S was partially prevented and acid response was completely blocked. Similar effects were exerted by intravenous devazepide and L-365,260 against intravenous cholecystokinin-8S. A complete blockade of pepsigogue effects induced by intracerebroventricular or intravenous cholecystokinin-8S was obtained after combined intravenous treatment with devazepide plus L-365,260. Gastric hypersecretory effects of intravenous cholecystokinin-8S were not modified by bilateral vagotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Increase in pepsinogen output evoked by centrally applied cholecystokinin-8S does not depend on interaction with central nervous sites. Following central or parenteral injection of cholecystokinin-8S, increase in peptic secretion would result from activation of both peripheral cholecystokinin A and B receptors presumably located at the level of gastric mucosa.

CCK1 and CCK2 receptors regulate gastric pepsinogen secretion.

The present study investigated (1) the pharmacological profile of cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor subtypes involved in the regulation of gastric pepsinogen secretion, (2) the influence of gastric acidity on peptic responses induced by CCK-8-sulfate (CCK-8S) or gastrin-I; and (3) the mechanisms accounting for the effects of CCK-like peptides on pepsinogen secretion. In anaesthetized rats, i.v. injection of CCK-8S or gastrin-I increased both pepsinogen and acid secretion. The pepsigogue effect of CCK-8S was higher than that of gastrin-I, whereas acid hypersecretion after CCK-8S was lower than that induced by gastrin-I. Peptic output following CCK-8S was partly blocked by i.v. injection of the CCK1 receptor antagonist, devazepide (-75.3%), or the CCK2 receptor antagonist, L-365,260 [3R(+)-N-(2,3-dihydro-1-methyl-2-oxo-5-phenyl-1H-1,4-benzodiazepine-3 yl)-N'-(3-methyl-phenyl)urea; -27.9%], but was fully prevented by combined administration of devazepide and L-365,260. The gastric acid hypersecretory effect of CCK-8S was enhanced by devazepide (+84.5%) and blocked by L-365,260. In contrast, the gastric secretory actions of gastrin-I were insensitive to devazepide, but abolished by L-365,260. Excitatory effects of CCK-8S and gastrin-I were not modified by vagotomy or atropine, whereas cimetidine or alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (irreversible blocker of histidine decarboxylase) partly prevented acid hypersecretion induced by both peptides without affecting their pepsigogue effects. After pretreatment with omeprazole, both CCK-8S and gastrin-I failed to stimulate acid secretion, while they increased pepsinogen output. In rats with gastric perfusion of acid solutions, CCK-8S or gastrin-I increased peptic output in a pH-independent manner either with or without pretreatment with omeprazole. Ablation of capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves as well as application of lidocaine to the gastric mucosa failed to modify the excitatory effects of CCK-8S or gastrin-I on pepsinogen and acid secretion. Blockade of the nitric oxide (NO) synthase pathway by N(G)-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester prevented the pepsigogue actions of both CCK-8S and gastrin-I (-61.8% and -71.7%, respectively), without affecting the concomitant increase in acid output. In addition, both these peptides significantly increased the release of NO breakdown products into the gastric lumen. The present results suggest that: (1) both CCK1 and CCK2 receptors mediate the peptic secretory responses induced by CCK-like peptides; (2) the excitatory inputs of CCK-8S and gastrin-I to chief cells are not driven through acid-dependent mechanisms or capsaicin-sensitive afferent sensory nerves; and (3) under in vivo conditions, the stimulant actions of CCK-like peptides on pepsinogen secretion are mediated, at least in part, by an increase in NO generation.