Study of management of appendicular abscess in children.

AIM: To compare the outcomes in children who underwent emergency surgery and those who underwent percutaneous drainage for appendicular abscess. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 45 children of appendicular abscess detected on ultrasonogram (USG) were included in the study. The following characteristics were registered: age, gender, the time from onset of symptoms to seeking care, pain, vomiting, fever and general peritonitis; white blood cell count. The size, location of the abscess was noted on USG. After the diagnosis, we divided the patients into two groups based on the type of management. Patients who underwent emergency surgery and appendectomy (Group 1) which composed of twenty patients (14 males and six females) with their ages ranged from 3 to 18 years, and patients treated with ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage and interval appendectomy (Group 2) which composed of 25 patients, (15 males and ten females) with their ages ranged from 2 to 18 years. RESULTS: Group 1 included twenty patients and Group 2 included 25 patients. In Group 1, on USG the average size of the abscess was 7.2 ± 2.5 cm. After the surgery regained their functional recovery during a mean period of 3.2 ± 1 days. In Group 2, on USG average abscess size was 6.8 ± 2.4 cm. After the procedure regained their functional recovery on the second day. No major complications were noted in Group 2. On the contrary, 12 patients (60%) of Group 1 show complications in the form of wound infection in eight children and wound dehiscence in four children. CONCLUSIONS: USG-guided percutaneous drainage was safe and effective way of management of appendicular abscess.

Influence of conventional and skeletal anchorage system supported fixed functional appliance on maxillo-mandibular complex and temporomandibular joint: A preliminary comparative cone beam computed tomography study.

AIM: Fixed functional appliance (FFA) used in the treatment of Class II malocclusion, lead to mandibular anterior teeth proclination, thus limiting the skeletal effects of the appliance. To counter this side effect, FFA is anchored in the lower anterior region of the mandible using the skeletal anchorage system. This pilot study was done to evaluate treatment and one-year post-treatment maxillo-mandibular, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) effects of conventional fixed functional appliance (FFA) and skeletal anchorage system supported fixed functional appliance (SAS-FFA) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Sixteen Class II individuals were equally divided into Group I (FFA) (mean age 13.11±0.38 years) and Group II (SAS-FFA) (mean age 12.96±0.38 years). CBCT scans taken, before treatment (T0), at the end of comprehensive treatment (T1), and after one-year post-treatment (T2), were evaluated for changes in maxillo-mandibular complex and TMJ. Intraclass correlation coefficient and independent "t" test were used for repeated measures, and inter-group (mean) changes respectively. RESULTS: After one-year post-comprehensive treatment, SAS-FFA showed significant maxillary restriction (SNA, -1.93°, P<0.05) with significant increase in mandibular length (Go-Pog, 3.25mm, P<0.001) (Co-Gn, 7.87mm, P<0.001). SAS-FFA groups showed significant upward and backward increase in condylar volume (571 mm3, P<0.001) with anterior translation of glenoid fossa. FFA group showed significant lower dentition and vertical relationship relapse, along with non-significant changes at TMJ. CONCLUSION: SAS-FFA is an effective combination, which brings favourable changes on maxillo-mandibular complex and temporomandibular joint with non-significant relapse in comparison to FFA at one-year post-treatment.