ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the Depression Subscale of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) in spine surgery, comparing it to Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, the HADS-D and the BDI were applied to patients undergoing spine surgery for lumbar (n=139) or cervical spondylosis (n=17). Spearman correlation tests for HADS-D and BDI were applied. The internal consistency of HADS-D was estimated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: According to the BDI, the prevalence of depression was of 28.8% (n=45). The Spearman r coefficient between HADS-D and BDI was 0.714 (p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha for HADS-D was 0.795. The area of the ROC curve was 0.845. Using a cutoff for HADS-D >10, there was a sensitivity of 71.1%, specificity of 95.4%, and positive likelihood-ratio of 15.78. CONCLUSIONS: HADS-D showed a strong correlation with BDI and good reliability. HADS-D is a good alternative for screening depression and assessing its severity.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Spondylosis/psychology , Spondylosis/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reproducibility of Results , Self Report , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the Depression Subscale of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) in spine surgery, comparing it to Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, the HADS-D and the BDI were applied to patients undergoing spine surgery for lumbar (n=139) or cervical spondylosis (n=17). Spearman correlation tests for HADS-D and BDI were applied. The internal consistency of HADS-D was estimated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: According to the BDI, the prevalence of depression was of 28.8% (n=45). The Spearman r coefficient between HADS-D and BDI was 0.714 (p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha for HADS-D was 0.795. The area of the ROC curve was 0.845. Using a cutoff for HADS-D >10, there was a sensitivity of 71.1%, specificity of 95.4%, and positive likelihood-ratio of 15.78. CONCLUSIONS: HADS-D showed a strong correlation with BDI and good reliability. HADS-D is a good alternative for screening depression and assessing its severity.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar a acurácia da Subescala de Depressão da Escala Hospitalar de Depressão e Ansiedade (HADS-D) em cirurgia da coluna, comparando-a com o Inventário de Depressão de Beck (BDI). MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal, no qual a HADS-D e o BDI foram aplicados em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia da coluna vertebral por espondilose lombar (n=139) ou cervical (n=17). Teste de correlação de Spearman foi aplicado entre HADS-D e BDI. A consistência interna da HADS-D foi estimada pelo coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. RESULTADOS: De acordo com o BDI, a prevalência de depressão foi de 28,8% (n=45). O coeficiente r de Spearman entre HADS-D e BDI foi de 0,714 (p <0,001). Alpha de Cronbach para o HADS-D foi de 0,795. A área da curva ROC foi de 0,845. Usando um corte para HADS-D >10, houve sensibilidade de 71,1%, especificidade de 95,4% e razão de verossimilhança positiva de 15,78. CONCLUSÕES: HADS-D apresentou forte correlação com o BDI e boa confiabilidade. A HADS-D é uma boa alternativa para a triagem de depressão e verificação da gravidade dos sintomas.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires , Spondylosis/psychology , Spondylosis/surgery , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Preoperative Care , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reproducibility of Results , Self Report , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Sleep disorders are very common in the young, being a result of the typical lifestyle lived by young people or a sleep disease that requires assistance and treatment. Furthermore, according to previous findings, sleep alterations can favor the development of depressive mood disorder. This survey aimed to assess the prevalence and characteristics of sleep disorders in a young population sample and their association with depressive symptoms. METHODS: With a cross-sectional study design, self-administered questionnaires were applied to 1,180 undergraduate students. The Mini-Sleep Questionnaire (MSQ) and the Beck Depression Inventory were used to evaluate sleep disturbances and depressive symptoms, respectively. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted, with the main findings being the presence of disrupted sleep (MSQ > 24), with an alpha error of 5%. The median point of the MSQ was 26 (P25-P75, 21-32 points). RESULTS: Sleep alterations were found in 59.6%. The prevalence of depression was 9.3% (n = 110), mild depression being identified in 5.9% (n = 62), moderate in 3.4% (n = 40), and severe in 0.7% (n = 8) of the students. In logistic regression, female gender (OR, 1.48; CI 95%, 1.09-2.01; P = 0.012) and being depressed (OR, 4.42; CI 95%, 2.30-8.50; P < 0.001) were independent factors for disrupted sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep alterations are prevalent complaints among young people, being present in nearly 60% of the students. Female gender and being depressed are independent factors for having some form of sleep disorder.
