ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hearing-impairment can lead to a reduced quality of life and thus represents a vulnerability factor for mental disorders. OBJECTIVE: This study represents the first psychiatric analysis of subjective quality of life and depression in people with hearing-impairment in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient group included 30 hearing-impaired participants (27 women, 3 men) with a current or previous mental disorder and/or psychiatric/psychotherapeutic treatment (age: mean, Mâ¯= 49.67 years; standard deviation, SDâ¯= 13.54 years). The control group consisted of 22 hearing-impaired participants (16 women, 6 men) without mental disorders or treatment (age: Mâ¯= 52.41 years, SDâ¯= 17.30 years). Besides sociodemographic variables, we registered onset/extent of the various hearing-impairments and hearing aid provision. Both groups underwent extensive diagnostic assessment comprising subjective functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Scale, SDS), health-related quality of life (SF-36 Health Survey), and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-II). RESULTS: Groups did not differ significantly in terms of sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, or intelligence. Participants of the patient group had a significantly greater subjective impairment, a lower quality of life, and more pronounced symptoms of depression. The invasiveness of the hearing aid (i.â¯e., cochlear implant) as well as the timepoint of hearing-impairment onset (postlingually) appear to serve as vulnerability factors for mental health problems in this group. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that besides delivering high-quality acoustic care, practitioners should continuously check patients' requirements for psychosocial treatment due to a loss of quality of life. The development of a specific psychotherapeutic treatment for hearing-impaired clients requires additional research focused on protective and vulnerability factors which may influence the emergence of mental disorders in these patients.
Subject(s)
Depression , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Quality of Life , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Germany , Hearing Aids , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Only limited data are available on the effectiveness of augmented antipsychotics to clozapine therapy in chronic schizophrenia. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of augmentation with the atypical neuroleptic amisulpride to clozapine in a small sample group of patients. METHODS: 16 patients with the DSM-IV diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia and partially responsive to clozapine participated in this pilot study. Patients on a steady dose of clozapine randomly received either clozapine and amisulpride 400 mg/day (n=7) or clozapine and amisulpride 600 mg/day (n=6) or clozapine and placebo for 6 weeks (n=3). Efficacy measures were BPRS, CGI, GAF and MADRS score. Side effects and prolactin levels were obtained. Primary outcome measure were BPRS score changes. RESULTS: The beneficial effect of augmented amisulpride at a daily dose of 600 mg was observed in the mean scores of secondary outcome measures, as assessed by GAF, CGI and MADRS. Measures of primary objectives failed to improve significantly. No reduction in BPRS total score was achieved due to lack of power of the study, whereas the BPRS subscore "activity" had a tendency to improve. Amisulpride was more beneficial in a higher than a lower dose. No severe side-effects occurred, but tremor, bradykinesia, akathisia and elevated prolactin levels were recorded. DISCUSSION: Augmented amisulpride improved the global outcome of patients suffering from chronic schizophrenia in this pilot study and tended to be a helpful treatment option in cases of partial or non-responsiveness to clozapine. Limitations emerge from the small sample size and lack of power. Further investigation requires a larger number of patients to be included.
