Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 15(7): 579-86, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1424514

ABSTRACT

Two enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) detecting Chlamydia trachomatis from endocervical swabs, Syva MicroTrak (MT) and Abbott Chlamydiazyme (CZ), were compared with a tissue culture (TC) standard. Initially, 8% (100 of 1250) of specimens were TC positive, yielding sensitivities of 94% (94 of 100) for MT and 79% (79 of 100) for CZ with identical 98% specificities (1129 of 1150 for MT and 1130 of 1150 for CZ). Discrepant specimens were retested by both EIAs and assayed for elementary bodies (EBs) by a fluorescent antibody test. After discrepancy analysis, 9.5% (118) of 1240 patients were either TC or EB positive, yielding sensitivities of 94.1% for MT (111 of 118) and 79.7% for CZ (94 of 118) with identical specificities of 100% (1122 of 1122). These results indicate that the MT is significantly more sensitive (p less than 0.05, McNemar test) than CZ in detecting C. trachomatis from endocervical swabs.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Culture Techniques/standards , Evaluation Studies as Topic , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vaginal Smears
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...