A Microsurgical Vacuum Pick for Membrane Peeling Without Forceps During Vitreoretinal Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To describe a new device and method for peeling membranes without forceps during vitreoretinal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A novel micro-vacuum-pick (MVP) was used to peel internal limiting membrane (ILM) and/or epiretinal membrane (ERM) in 24 consecutive pars plana vitrectomy procedures. The MVP was used to create an edge in the membrane, strip the membrane from the retinal surface, and evacuate the membrane from the eye through the lumen of the device using active aspiration. RESULTS: The MVP was the sole device used to peel and remove ILM and/or ERM in each case. No surgical complication occurred during any case. The MVP was used to perform the fluid-air exchange in all cases in which a fluid-air exchange was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The MVP introduces a new method of peeling ILM and ERM without forceps. The MVP device and method eliminate the need for a separate device to create an edge in the ILM or ERM, reduce or eliminate instrument exchanges during membrane peeling, and eliminate the need for a separate extrusion cannula for fluid-air exchange. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:196-199.].

Improved bleeding scores using Gelfoam(®) Powder with incremental concentrations of bovine thrombin in a swine liver lesion model.

Topical hemostatic agents are used intra-operatively to prevent uncontrolled bleeding. Gelfoam(®) Powder contains a hemostatic agent prepared from purified pork skin gelatin, the efficacy of which is increased when combined with thrombin. However, the effect of increasing concentrations of thrombin on resultant hemostasis is not known. This study sought to evaluate the ability of various concentrations of thrombin in combination with Gelfoam Powder to control bleeding using a swine liver lesion model. Ten pigs underwent a midline laparotomy. Circular lesions were created in the left medial, right medial, and left lateral lobes; six lesions per lobe. Gelfoam Powder was hydrated with Thrombin-JMI(®) diluted to 250, 375, and 770 IU/mL. Each concentration was applied to two lesion sites per lobe. Bleeding scores were measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 min using a 6-point system; comparison of bleeding scores was performed using ANOVA with the post hoc Tukey test. The bleeding scores with thrombin concentrations at 770 IU/mL were significantly lower than at 250 and 375 IU/mL at all four time points. The percentage of biopsies with a clinically acceptable bleeding score rose from 37.9, 46.6, and 71.2 % at 3 min to 55.2, 69.0, and 88.1 % at 12 min in the 250, 375, and 770 IU/mL thrombin groups, respectively. The study showed that the hemostatic response to thrombin was dose-related: using higher concentrations of thrombin with Gelfoam Powder yielded improved hemostasis, as determined by lower bleeding scores.

3-Dimensional bifurcation angle analysis in patients with left main disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (SYNergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXus and Cardiac Surgery).

OBJECTIVES: We explore the bifurcation angle (BA) parameters of the left main coronary artery (LM), the effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on this angulation, and the impact of BA on clinical outcome. BACKGROUND: The BA is emerging as a predictor of outcome after PCI of bifurcation lesions. Three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) overcomes the shortcomings of 2-dimensional analysis and provides reliable data. METHODS: This is a substudy of the SYNTAX (SYNergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXus and Cardiac Surgery) trial. The cineangiograms of the 354 patients who underwent PCI of their LM stem were analyzed with 3D QCA software (CardiOp-B, Paieon Medical, Ltd., Rosh Ha'ayin, Israel). The proximal BA (between LM and left circumflex [LCX]) and the distal BA (between left anterior descending and LCX) were computed in end-diastole and end-systole, both before and after PCI. The cumulative major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular event (MACCE) rates throughout the 12-month period after randomization were stratified across pre-PCI distal BA values and compared accordingly. RESULTS: Complete analysis was feasible in 266 (75.1%) patients. Proximal and distal BA had mean pre-PCI end-diastolic values of 105.9 +/- 21.7 degrees and 95.6 +/- 23.6 degrees , respectively, and were inversely correlated (r = -0.75, p < 0.001). During systolic motion of the heart there was an enlargement of the proximal angle and a reduction of the distal angle (DeltaBA -8.2 degrees and 8.5 degrees , respectively, p < 0.001 for both). The PCI resulted in a mean decrease in the distal BA (DeltaBA 4.5 degrees , p < 0.001). The MACCE rates did not differ across distal BA values; freedom from MACCE at 12 months was 82.8%, 85.4%, and 81.1% (p = 0.74) for diastolic values (first through third tertile). CONCLUSIONS: Left main BA analysis with 3D QCA is feasible. Both proximal and distal angles are affected by cardiac motion; PCI modifies the distal angle. There is no clear difference in event rates across pre-PCI distal BA values.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involving drug-eluting stents is increasingly used to treat complex coronary artery disease, although coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the treatment of choice historically. Our trial compared PCI and CABG for treating patients with previously untreated three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease (or both). METHODS: We randomly assigned 1800 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease to undergo CABG or PCI (in a 1:1 ratio). For all these patients, the local cardiac surgeon and interventional cardiologist determined that equivalent anatomical revascularization could be achieved with either treatment. A noninferiority comparison of the two groups was performed for the primary end point--a major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (i.e., death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) during the 12-month period after randomization. Patients for whom only one of the two treatment options would be beneficial, because of anatomical features or clinical conditions, were entered into a parallel, nested CABG or PCI registry. RESULTS: Most of the preoperative characteristics were similar in the two groups. Rates of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 12 months were significantly higher in the PCI group (17.8%, vs. 12.4% for CABG; P=0.002), in large part because of an increased rate of repeat revascularization (13.5% vs. 5.9%, P<0.001); as a result, the criterion for noninferiority was not met. At 12 months, the rates of death and myocardial infarction were similar between the two groups; stroke was significantly more likely to occur with CABG (2.2%, vs. 0.6% with PCI; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: CABG remains the standard of care for patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, since the use of CABG, as compared with PCI, resulted in lower rates of the combined end point of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114972.)