ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The patients' request for treatment with clear aligners is constantly increasing. The aligners permit to the clinicians a valid way to solve a lot of orthodontic cases but the patients' compliance and the clinicians' capabilities and knowledge of the technique is fundamental for the outcome. METHODS: Seventy-two digital models of 18 consecutive patients treated with Invisalign and Smart Track aligners for 14 weeks were analyzed. The operator positioned 24 points on each model and were obtained the values of arch depth and perimeter of arch before and after the treatment. The variations of measurement were calculated with t student test. RESULTS: A decrease of arch depth and perimeter was found from t0 to t1 and the most relevant difference was observed in the upper arch depth with a decrease of 1.3 mm and in the upper arch perimeter with a difference of 1.1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: There was always a decrease of the values of arch depth and arch perimeter at the end of the treatment, especially in the upper arch. These changes must be considered by the clinicians to perform a better treatment to obtain the most predictable results and a patient's higher satisfaction.
Subject(s)
Orthodontic Appliances, Removable , Tooth Movement Techniques , Esthetics , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Myeloablative and hematopoietic stem cells transplantation therapy (HSCT) often acts as side-effect to oral mucositis (OM) with no effective treatment. This randomized-controlled trial analyzed the efficacy of palifermin, administered as a dose during HSCT therapy, as primary prophylaxis on pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: In this study forty-six patients (9-15 years) with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) were analyzed. The patients underwent allogenic HSCT conditioned by myeloablative regimen. Subsequently to randomization, patients in the palifermin group were assigned to receive palifermin, 60 mg/kg, intravenously as a single dose 3 days before and after transplant conditioning regimen cycle. The patients in the Control group received only a placebo treatment. Maximum severity of OM, incidence and duration of ulcerative OM, incidence and duration of severe OM limitations were evaluated. RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction in the incidence of OM up to grade 3 in the palifermin group compared to the control group was discovered. There was also a reduction, confirmed at 60 days, in the degree of severity of mucositis in the palifermin group, with an average of 1.54 grade in the palifermin group, and of 2.16 in the Control group and in the use of opioid analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that a single dose of palifermin used as primary prophylaxis during HSTC therapy can prevent severe OM in pediatric patients with ALL and used as secondary prophylaxis can prevent the recurrence of severe OM in high-risk patients with previous mucosal injury and improves the quality of life in pediatric patients with ALL.