ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: One of the main criticisms of laparoscopic liver resection is that it is difficult, or not possible, to perform liver-sparing resections. Our aim was to present short videos where the intrahepatic Glissonian approach was used to perform anatomical liver segmental resections, instead of a larger operation, to avoid unnecessary sacrifice of the liver parenchyma. METHODS: We selected six types of anatomical liver resections to exemplify the use of the intrahepatic Glissonian approach to perform segment-oriented liver resections. These types of hepatectomies were used as an alternative to right or left hepatectomy, or as an alternative to extended liver resections. RESULTS: The intrahepatic Glissonian approach was feasible in all cases. The use of anatomical landmarks previously described was essential to reach and control the Glissonian pedicles. Among the liver-sparing resections, we were able to perform right anterior (S5 + S8) and posterior (S6 + S7) sectionectomies, resection of segments 2, 3, and 4, and mesohepatectomy (S4 + S5 + S8). No patient presented postoperative liver failure. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic liver-sparing resections are feasible and may be a good alternative to hemihepatectomies or extended liver resections. The use of the intrahepatic Glissonian approach can be useful.
Subject(s)
Hepatectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver/surgery , Parenchymal Tissue/surgery , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Organ Sparing TreatmentsSubject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Hepatectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ligation/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Portal Vein/surgery , Risk Assessment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) allows R0 resection even for patients with extremely small future liver remnants. The ALPPS procedure was initially described for two-stage right trisectionectomy. Reversal ALPPS is a denomination in which the future liver remnant is the right posterior section of the liver. PATIENT: A 42-year-old woman with colorectal metastases in all segments except segment 1 underwent chemotherapy with objective response and was referred for surgical treatment. The computed tomography (CT) scan showed a predominance of metastases in the left liver and in the right anterior section. The right posterior section had three metastases. The plan was to perform a laparoscopic reversal ALPPS (left portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting in a two-stage left trisectionectomy). TECHNIQUE: Three metastases in the right posterior section were resected, followed by liver partition and left portal vein ligature. The CT scan showed a 70 % increase in the future liver remnant. The second stage constituted left trisectionectomy. At laparoscopy after division of adhesions, the left Glissonian pedicle was divided with an endostapler. A stapler also was used to transect the left and middle hepatic veins, and the specimen was removed through a suprapubic incision. The operative times were respectively 5 and 3 h, and the patient was discharged on days 4 and 5, respectively. No blood transfusion or intensive care unit stay was necessary. At this writing, the patient shows no evidence of the disease 18 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Reversal laparoscopic ALPPS is feasible and safe. Laparoscopy is useful for decreasing blood loss and optimizing visualization during liver transection.
