Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Growth Horm IGF Res ; 17(3): 220-6, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17339122

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a test for GH abuse in sport. DESIGN: A double blind placebo controlled study of one month's GH administration to 102 healthy non-competing but trained subjects. Blood levels of nine markers of GH action were measured throughout the study and for 56 days after cessation of GH administration. Blood samples were also taken from 813 elite athletes both in and out of competition. RESULTS: GH caused a significant change in the nine measured blood markers. Men were more sensitive to the effects of GH than women. IGF-I and N-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type III were selected to construct formulae which gave optimal discrimination between the GH and placebo groups. Adjustments were made to account for the fall in IGF-I and P-III-P with age and the altered distribution seen in elite athletes. Using a cut-off specificity of 1:10,000 these formulae would allow the detection of up to 86% of men and 60% of women abusing GH at the doses used in this study. CONCLUSIONS: We report a methodology that will allow the detection of GH abuse. This will provide the basis of a robust and enforceable test identifying those who are already cheating and provide a deterrent to those who may be tempted to do so.


Subject(s)
Doping in Sports , Growth Hormone/administration & dosage , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/analysis , Peptide Fragments/blood , Procollagen/blood , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Placebos
2.
Biostatistics ; 2(4): 417-32, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12933633

ABSTRACT

The motivation for the methodological development is a double-blind clinical trial designed to estimate the effect of regular injection of growth hormone, with the purpose of identifying growth hormone abusers in sport. The data formed part of a multicentre investigation jointly sponsored by the European Union and the International Olympic Committee. The data are such that for each individual there is a matrix of marker variables by time point (nominally 8 markers at each of 7 time points). Data arise out of a double-blind trial in which individuals are given growth hormone at one of two dose levels or placebo daily for 28 days. Monitoring by means of blood samples is at 0, 21, 28, 30, 33, 42 and 84 days. We give a new method of Bayesian discrimination for multivariate longitudinal data. This involves a Kronecker product covariance structure for the time by measurements (markers) data on each individual. This structure is estimated by an empirical Bayes approach, using an ECM algorithm, within a Bayesian Gaussian discrimination model. In future one may have markers for an individual at one or more time points. The method gives probabilities that an individual is on placebo or on one of the two dose regimes.

3.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 85(4): 1505-12, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10770189

ABSTRACT

The effects of GH on bone remodeling in healthy adults have not been systematically investigated. An analysis of these effects might provide insights into GH physiology and might yield data useful for the detection of GH doping in sports. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of GH administration on biochemical markers of bone and collagen turnover in healthy volunteers. Ninety-nine healthy volunteers of both sexes were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study and assigned to receive either placebo (40 subjects) or recombinant human GH (0.1 IU/kg day in 29 subjects and 0.2 IU/kg x day in 30 subjects). The treatment duration was 28 days, followed by a 56-day wash-out period. The biochemical markers evaluated were the bone formation markers osteocalcin and C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, the resorption marker type I collagen telopeptide, and the soft tissue marker procollagen type III. All variables increased on days 21 and 28 in the two active treatment groups vs. levels in both the baseline (P < 0.01) and placebo (P < 0.01) groups. The increment was more pronounced in the 0.2 IU/kg-day group and remained significant on day 84 for procollagen type III (from 0.53 +/- 0.13 to 0.61 +/- 0.14 kU/L; P < 0.02) and osteocalcin (from 12.2 + 2.9 to 14.6 +/- 3.6 UG/L; P < 0.02), whereas levels of C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and type I collagen telopeptide declined after day 42 and were no longer significantly above baseline on day 84 (from 3.9 +/- 1.2 to 5.1 +/-1.5 microg/L and from 174 +/- 60 to 173 +/- 53 microg/L, respectively). Gender-related differences were observed in the study; females were less responsive than males to GH administration with respect to procollagen type III and type I collagen telopeptide (P < 0.001). In conclusion, exogenous GH administration affects the biochemical parameters of bone and collagen turnover in a dose- and gender-dependent manner. As GH-induced modifications of most markers, in particular procollagen type III and osteocalcin, persist after GH withdrawal, they may be suitable markers for detecting GH abuse.


Subject(s)
Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Collagen/metabolism , Doping in Sports , Human Growth Hormone/pharmacology , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Collagen/blood , Collagen Type I , Discriminant Analysis , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Osteocalcin/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Peptides/blood , Placebos , Procollagen/blood
5.
Biometrika ; 53(1): 262-4, 1966 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5964069
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...