The signed helical angle: A technique for characterizing midfoot motion during gait.

Quantifying motion in the midfoot during gait and other movements is important for a variety of applications, but challenging due to the complexity of the multiple small articulations involved. The most common motion capture based techniques are limited in their ability to characterize the non-planar nature of the midfoot joint axes. In this study we developed a novel Signed Helical Angle (SHA) to quantify midfoot angular displacement. Motion capture data from 40 healthy subjects walking at a controlled speed were used to calculate finite helical axes and angles from a two-segment foot model. Axes were classified as either pronation or supination based on their orientation, and given a sign, thus either adding to or subtracting from the angular displacement. Analysis focused on insights from axis orientation and comparisons to other techniques. Results showed that when transitions were excluded, pronation and supination axes were fairly well clustered in the transverse plane. The resulting SHA midfoot angle waveform was comparable to sagittal plane Euler and helical component waveforms, but with 39% (approximately 3°) greater range of motion in pronation and 25% (approximately 4°) greater in supination, due to the direct measurement of the motion path and the influence of the other planes. The proposed SHA method may provide an intuitive and useful method to analyze midfoot motion for a variety of applications, particularly when interventions cause subtle changes that may be diluted in planar analyses.

Functional assessments of foot strength: a comparative and repeatability study.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the strength of the small muscles of the foot may be useful in a variety of clinical applications but is challenging from a methodology standpoint. Previous efforts have focused primarily on the functional movement of toe flexion, but clear methodology guidelines are lacking. A novel foot doming test has also been proposed, but not fully evaluated. The purposes of the present study were to assess the repeatability and comparability of several functional foot strength assessment techniques. METHODS: Forty healthy volunteers were evaluated across two testing days, with a two-week doming motion practice period between them. Seven different measurements were taken using a custom toe flexion dynamometer (seated), custom doming dynamometer (standing), and a pressure mat (standing). Measurements from the doming dynamometer were evaluated for reliability (ICCs) and a learning effect (paired t-tests), while measurements from the toe flexion dynamometer and pressure mat were evaluated for reliability and comparability (correlations). Electromyography was also used to descriptively assess the extent of muscle isolation in all measurements. RESULTS: Doming showed excellent within-session reliability (ICCs > 0.944), but a clear learning effect was present, with strength (p < 0.001) and muscle activity increasing between sessions. Both intrinsic and extrinsic muscles were engaged during this test. All toe flexion tests also showed excellent reliability (ICCs > 0.945). Seated toe flexion tests using the dynamometer were moderately correlated to standing toe flexion tests on a pressure mat (r > 0.54); however, there were some differences in muscle activity. The former may better isolate the toe flexors, while the latter appeared to be more functional for many pathologies. On the pressure mat, reciprocal motion appeared to display slightly greater forces and reliability than isolated toe flexion. CONCLUSIONS: This study further refines potential methodology for foot strength testing. These devices and protocols can be duplicated in the clinic to evaluate and monitor rehabilitation progress in clinical populations associated with foot muscle weakness.