Primary medication non-adherence to analgesics and antibiotics at Counties Manukau Health Emergency Department.

AIM: To measure primary medication non-adherence to antibiotics, paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients discharged from Counties Manukau Health Emergency Department (CMH-ED). METHOD: A retrospective observational study based on 1,600 discharged patients' data collected between 28 April-6 May and 28 July-9 August 2014. Data were included for patients who were residents within the Auckland Regional Public Health Service boundaries, presented to CMH-ED and were discharged with a prescription. RESULTS: Of 992 patients, 48.5% did not have at least one medication on their discharge prescription filled. Patients were mostly born in New Zealand (66.5%), of Pacific Island descent (42.8%), living in the most socioeconomically deprived areas (78.1%) and under 10 years of age (32.6%). Filling rates significantly increased with >1 prescribed item (p≤0.01). NSAIDs were significantly more likely to be filled compared with paracetamol (59.9% vs 51.3%, p=0.034); antibiotics were significantly more likely to be filled than all other medicines (80.4%, p<0.001). The most significant predictors for non-adherence when accounting for number and types of medications were patients 10-44 years (p<0.05) and smokers (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Age, smoking and number of prescribed medications were predictors of non-adherence to medication type. Further research is warranted to assess whether changes to prescription co-payments affect the rate of nonadherence.

Primary medication non-adherence at Counties Manukau Health Emergency Department (CMH-ED), New Zealand: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To measure primary medication non-adherence (failure to fill prescription medicines) in patients discharged from the emergency department (ED), and to determine whether sociodemographic factors, smoking status and access to a general practitioner affect prescription filling. Little is known about primary medication non-adherence in EDs, and less so in New Zealand (NZ). Identifying reasons for non-adherence will enable development of strategies to improve adherence and reduce morbimortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: An observational study based on patient data from the ED of a large public hospital in South Auckland, NZ. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from 1600 patients discharged between 28 April-6 May and 28 July-9 August 2014. Data were included if patients were residents within the Auckland Regional Public Health Service boundaries, admitted to ED and discharged with a prescription. Data were excluded if patients were admitted to another ward, transferred to another hospital or left the ED without seeing a doctor. RESULTS: 992 patients were included in the study, the majority were under 10 years (32.6%), of Pacific Island descent (42.8%), NZ-born (67.7%) and living in the most socioeconomically deprived areas (78.1%). Almost 50% of patients failed to fill all prescription medications. Simple linear regression analysis indicated that non-adherence was significant for those 10-24 years (n=236; adherence=47.2%; p<0.05), of NZ Maori ethnicity (n=175; 51.3%; p=0.01), unemployed (n=77; 46.8%; p<0.01), homemakers (n=66; 45.7%; p<0.01), students (n=228; 55.6%; p<0.05) and cigarette smokers (n=139; 50.3%; p<0.01). Following multivariable analysis, the strongest predictors for non-adherence were those aged between 10 and 17 years (n=116; p<0.01), the unemployed (n=77; p=0.01) and homemakers (n=66; p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Age and occupation were the greater predictors of non-adherence; however, no other significant differences were found. Since this study, changes to prescription co-payments have been made. Further research is warranted to assess whether this change has more recently affected the rates of non-adherence.

Patient awareness, knowledge and use of colchicine: an exploratory qualitative study in the Counties Manukau region, Auckland, New Zealand.

INTRODUCTION Treatment of gout, specifically with colchicine, varies globally. Colchicine can be fatal due to its narrow therapeutic index and potential for interactions. In New Zealand, cases of intentional and unintentional colchicine overdose have been documented. AIMS To explore patients' knowledge on the use of gout medicines, and in particular their awareness of the maximum dose of colchicine, the dangers of colchicine overdose, and their opinions on restricting colchicine dispensing. The study also investigates where patients receive gout information. METHODS Thirty people with gout presenting to their regular gout clinic in Auckland currently or previously taking colchicine were invited to participate in a 30-min semi-structured interview. Data were analysed using a general inductive thematic approach. FINDINGS Overall, participants had a lack of knowledge regarding colchicine and used variable doses during an acute gout attack. Participants were unsure of the maximum dose of colchicine and several took more than prescribed. The prophylactic use of colchicine and allopurinol varied from 3 weeks to 15 years. Mixed views were reported on restricting colchicine supply. Most participants received gout information from their general practitioner (GP). CONCLUSION Poor understanding of colchicine contributed to inappropriate use and highlights the need for targeted patient education. Considerable inter-patient variability exists in the use of colchicine for acute gout, suggesting the efficacy of low dose regimens be explored. The length of adjunctive colchicine use, as part of a prophylaxis regimen, needs to be regularly reviewed and tailored to each patient. Further research is required on limiting the amount of colchicine dispensed.