Advancing primary and community care for persons with spinal cord injury: Key findings from a Canadian summit.

Context: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience significant challenges when they access primary care and community services.Design: A provincial summit was held to direct research, education, and innovation for primary and community care for SCI.Setting: Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Participants: Key stakeholders (N = 95) including persons with SCI and caregivers, clinicians from primary care, rehabilitation, and specialized care, researchers, advocacy groups, and policy makers.Methods: A one-day facilitated meeting that included guest speakers, panel discussions and small group discussions was held to generate potential solutions to current issues related to SCI care and to foster collaborative relationships to advance care for SCI. Perspectives on SCI management were shared by primary care, neurosurgery, rehabilitation, and members of the SCI communityOutcome Measures: Discussions were focused on five domains: knowledge translation and dissemination, application of best practices, communication, research, and patient service accessibility.Results: Summit participants identified issues and prioritized solutions to improve primary and community care including the creation of a network of key stakeholders to enable knowledge creation and dissemination; an online repository of SCI resources, integrated health records, and a clinical network for SCI care; development and implementation of strategies to improve care transitions across sectors; implementation of effective care models and improved access to services; and utilization of empowerment frameworks to support self-management.Conclusions: This summit identified priorities for further collaborative efforts to advance SCI primary and community care and will inform the development of a provincial SCI strategy aimed at improving the system of care for SCI.

Facilitators and Barriers to International Collaboration in Spinal Cord Injury: Results from a Survey of Clinicians and Researchers.

International collaboration in spinal cord injury (SCI) research is necessary to overcome the challenges often encountered by clinicians and researchers, including participant recruitment, high cost, and the need for specialized expertise. However, international collaboration poses its own obstacles. The objective of this study was to conduct an international online survey to assess barriers and facilitators to international SCI clinical research, potential initiatives to facilitate future collaborations, and the use of SCI-specific data sets and standards. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Of 364 total respondents, 213 completed the survey, with the majority of these participants based in North America (38%), Asia (22%), Europe (18%), and Oceania (16%). Over half had more than 10 years of experience in SCI research or clinical practice (57%) and 60% had previous experience with international collaborations. Funding was identified as a top barrier (82%), a facilitator (93%), and a proposed future initiative (97%). Communication and technology were also identified as strong facilitators and proposed future initiatives. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI were used by 69% of participants, the International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after SCI by 13% of participants, and the International SCI Data Sets by 45% of participants. As the need for international collaborations in SCI research increases, it is important to identify how clinicians and researchers can be supported by SCI consumer and professional organizations, funders, and networks. Furthermore, unique solutions to overcome modifiable barriers and creation of new facilitators are also needed.

Advancing research and clinical care in the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: Key findings from a Canadian summit.

Background: Optimal management of neuropathic pain (NP) is essential to enhancing health-related quality of life for individuals living with spinal cord injury (SCI). A key strategic priority for the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF) and Rick Hansen Institute (RHI) is optimizing NP management after SCI. Aims: A National Canadian Summit, sponsored by ONF and RHI, was held to develop a strategic plan to improve NP management after SCI. Methods: In a one-day meeting held in Toronto, Ontario, a multidisciplinary panel of 18 Canadian stakeholders utilized a consensus workshop methodology to (1) describe the current state of the field, (2) create a long-term vision, and (3) identify steps for moving into action. Results: A review of the current state of the field identified strengths including rigourously developed evidence syntheses and practice landscape documentation. Identified gaps included limited evidence on NP hindering recommendation development in evidence syntheses, absence of a national strategy, care silos with limited cross-continuum connections, limited consumer involvement, and limited practice standard implementation. The panel identified key themes for a long-term vision to improve the management of SCI NP in Canada, including establishing an integrated collaborative network; standardized care and outcome evaluation; education; advocacy; and directing resources to innovative solutions. The panel identified the next step as prioritization of areas that will have the greatest impact in a 5-year time frame. Conclusion: A strategic plan outlining a long-term vision to improve management of NP after SCI in Canada was developed and will inform future activities of the sponsors.

Contexte: La gestion optimale de la douleur neuropathique est essentielle à l'amélioration de la qualité de vie liée à la santé des personnes vivant avec une lésion de la moelle épinière. L'une des priorités stratégiques de la Fondation ontarienne de neurotraumatologie et de l'Institut Rick Hansen est l'optimisation de la prise en charge de la douleur neuropathique après une lésion de la moelle épinière.Buts: Un sommet national canadien parrainé par la Fondation ontarienne de neurotraumatologie et l'Institut Rick Hansen a été tenu afin d'élaborer un plan stratégique pour l'amélioration de la gestion de la douleur neuropathique après une lésion de la moelle épinière.Méthodes: Dans le cadre d'une rencontre d'une journée tenue à Toronto, Ontario, un panel multidisciplinaire composé de 18 parties prenantes canadiennes a eu recours à la méthodologie de l'atelier consensuel pour (1) décrire la situation actuelle dans le domaine, (2) définir une vision à long terme et (3) déterminer les étapes à suivre pour passer à l'action.Résultats: Une revue de la situation actuelle dans le domaine a permis d'en répertorier les forces, parmi lesquelles on compte des synthèses de données probantes élaborées avec rigueur et la documentation des pratiques. Les lacunes suivantes ont été répertoriées: des données probantes limitées en ce qui concerne la formulation de recommandations pour empêcher la douleur neuropathique dans les synthèses de données probantes; l'absence de stratégie nationale; un mode de prestation des soins en silos, où les liens entre les continuums sont limités; une participation du consommateur limitée et une mise en œuvre limitée des normes de pratique. Le panel a répertorié les grands thèmes pour élaborer une vision à long terme afin d'améliorer la prise en charge de la douleur neuropathique occasionnée par une lésion de la moelle épinière au Canada, parmi lesquels on compte: l'établissement d'un réseau de collaboration intégré; la normalisation des soins et l'évaluation des résultats; l'éducation; le plaidoyer; et l'attribution de ressources aux solutions novatrices. Le panel a déterminé que la prochaine étape consisterait à prioriser les domaines qui auront le plus de répercussions au cours des cinq prochaines années.Conclusion: Un plan stratégique définissant une vision à long terme pour améliorer la prise en charge de la douleur neuropathique après une lésion de la moelle épinière a été élaboré. Ce plan servira de base aux prochaines activités des promoteurs.

ONF trainee awards contribute to capacity building in neurotrauma.

OBJECTIVE: Injury to the brain and spinal cord is one of the most catastrophic and costly occurrences in the Ontario health system. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of past Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF) studentships and fellowships in terms of capacity building in the neurotrauma field in Ontario. METHOD: An online, cross sectional survey amongst past recipients of studentships and fellowships that terminated prior to July 2005. Explicit data were collected on various aspects of career development including current activity, awards and publications. RESULTS: Thirty-six out of 42 (86%) eligible past trainees responded; 12 (33%) were Masters students, 12 (33%) were PhD students and 12 (33%) were Post-Doctoral students. A majority of the recipients (61%) are currently involved in neurotrauma-related activities (clinical, research and teaching) in more than 20% of their time, with no substantial differences between the degree groups. Half the recipients are currently involved in neurotrauma-related research in more than 20% of their time. The awardees published 1.5 peer-review manuscripts/person-year and received multiple awards. A high majority of our recipients (86%) feel that the ONF award had a substantial impact on their career. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of past award recipients remain involved in neurotrauma activities, especially in research. These results may lead to a cautious conclusion of the positive impact of the ONF studentships and fellowships on neurotrauma capacity building. These results should be considered in strategic planning of funding agencies similar to ONF.