Quality of life of hemodialysis patients in Central and Southern Italy: cross-sectional comparison between Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) and Bicarbonate Hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: in hemodialysis (HD) patients, poor health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) is prevalent and associated with adverse outcomes. HR-QoL is strictly linked to nutritional status of HD patients. Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) is an alternative dialysis technique that combines diffusion, convection and absorption. It reduces burden of inflammation and malnutrition and this effect may cause beneficial effect on HR-QoL. However no data on HR-QoL in HFR is currently available. METHODS: we designed a cross-sectional multicentre study in order to compare the HR-QoL in patients treated with HFR versus Bicarbonate HD (BHD). We enrolled adult patients HFR treated for at least 6 months, with life expectancy greater than six months and without overt cognitive deficit. The recruited patients in HFR were matched for age, gender, dialytic vintage and performance in activities of daily living (Barthel index) with BHD treated patients. SF-36 questionnaire for the assessment of HR-QoL was administered. RESULTS: one hundred fourteen patients (57 HFR vs 57 BHD) were enrolled (age 65.413.5 years; dialysis vintage 5.4 (3.3-10.3) years; 53% males) from 18 dialysis non-profit centres in central and southern Italy. As result of matching, no difference in age, gender, dialytic age and Barthel index was found between HFR and BHD patients. In HFR patients we observed better values of physical component score (PCS) of SF-36 than BHD patients (P=0.048), whereas no significant difference emerged in the mental component score (P=0.698). In particular HFR patients were associated with higher Physical Functioning (P=0.045) and Role Physical (P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: HFR is associated with better physical component of HR-QoL than BHD, independently of age, gender, dialysis vintage and invalidity score. Whether these findings translate into a survival benefit must be investigated by longitudinal studies.

Effect of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion on overt idiopathic chronic inflammation in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a multicenter longitudinal study.

Chronic inflammation is widely diffuse in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients and is associated with poor survival. Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) is a dialysis technique, highly biocompatible, able to adsorb proinflammatory cytokines and to decrease amino acids and antioxidants loss. These features could be helpful in MHD patients affected by idiopathic chronic inflammation, but this issue remains to be elucidated. We performed a multicenter longitudinal study to assess the effect of the switching from bicarbonate HD to HFR in patients with serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) > 5 mg/L coupled with albumin <4.0 g/dL in the last 6 months. We enrolled 24/176 (14%) patients, of which 20 patients were assessed at 4 months and 18 completed the study. We excluded 11 patients with evident causes of inflammation. At baseline, serum levels of CRP (18.7[7.0-39.4] mg/L) and albumin (3.5[3.3-3.7] g/dL) were significantly correlated (r = -0.49; P = 0.028). The effect on CRP and albumin was almost evident in the first 4 months and remained stable until to eighth month. A strict correlation (R = -0.49; 0.040) between percentage change of CRP (-35%) and albumin (+14%) after 8 months of HFR. These effects were associated with the reduction of IL-6, IL-1ß, and TNF-α and the increment of pre-albumin and leptin, whereas the serum levels of Branched Chain Amino Acid (BCAA) remained unchanged. In MHD patients affected by idiopathic chronic inflammation the switching from BHD to HFR is associated with improvement of inflammation. Whether these favorable effects may modify the outcomes of these high-risk patients needs to be confirmed by studies ad hoc.