ABSTRACT
AIM: This split-mouth double-masked randomized controlled clinical study evaluated the effectiveness of photoactivated disinfection (PAD) using light-emitting diode (LED) as an adjunct in the management of patients affected by moderate to severe chronic periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients affected by moderate to severe chronic periodontitis were enrolled. After scaling and root planing (SRP), each quadrant was assigned to one of the following groups: LED group (625-635 nm, maximum power density: 2000 mW/cm(2) ), photosensitizer group (tolouidine blue O, 0.1 mg/ml), PAD group (photosensitizer and LED) and control group (no adjunctive treatment). The adjunctive treatments were repeated after 7 and 14 days. The clinical parameters of bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth and clinical attachment level were measured at baseline and 1 and 3 months after SRP. RESULTS: At 1 and 3 months, all groups showed significant improvements with regard to all clinical parameters compared to baseline (all p: <0.001). There were no significant differences among groups in terms of changes of clinical parameters in any time interval (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The application of PAD using LED with the current setting did not have additional effects on clinical parameters in patients diagnosed with moderate to severe chronic periodontitis compared with SRP alone.
Subject(s)
Chronic Periodontitis/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Tolonium Chloride/therapeutic use , Adult , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Chi-Square Distribution , Dental Disinfectants/therapeutic use , Dental Scaling , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Periodontal Attachment Loss/drug therapy , Periodontal Index , Pilot Projects , Semiconductors , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of static magnetic fields (SMFs) on the implants immediately placed in fresh extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who were in need of 20 fixed implant-supported single crowns in the anterior maxilla were included. After tooth extraction, screw-type implants were placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets and were randomly covered with either magnetic abutment (test group) or conventional healing abutment (control group). Radio frequency analysis (RFA) was conducted at implant placement and after 1, 2, and 3 months. Marginal bone level changes were recorded 1, 2, and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The RFA measurements showed a significant higher stability for implants in test group than that of control group after 1 month (P = 0.04). At month 2, less crestal bone loss was found in the test group (P = 0.03). However, at month 3, there was no significant difference between the groups for both parameters (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: SMFs caused more noticeable increase in implant stability and less bone loss during the initial weeks of healing.
