Limitations of the dichotomized 6-minute walk distance when computing lung allocation score for cystic fibrosis: a 16-year retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The 2010 Lung Allocation Score (LAS) version considers the estimated survival benefit offered by lung transplantation (LTx) and uses 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance as a dichotomous covariate of whether an individual can walk more than 150 ft or 45.7 m in 6 min. This study aimed to provide evidence that 6MWT gives no clinically meaningful information to be used in the current LAS for candidates to LTx with cystic fibrosis (CF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected data from 6MWTs performed since 2003 at our CF centre. A joint model was fitted to describe the effect of changes in walked distance on the hazard of LTx or death. RESULTS: Up to 2019, 552 6MWTs were performed on 163 individuals with CF. None of the individuals included walked for less than 45.7 m during the 6MWT. Based on the joint modelling, the association of walked distance with the hazard ratio (HR) of LTx or death was significant (HR 0.99, 95% Credible Interval [CI]: 0.99 to 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: When adopted dichotomously for LAS calculation, walked distance does not add any useful information about exercise capacity. Longitudinal trajectories of walked distance may provide complementary information about prognosis in individuals with CF.Implications for rehabilitationDichotomized walked distance does not contribute to lung allocation score in candidates to lung transplantation with cystic fibrosisChanges in the longitudinal trajectory of walked distance can be clinically meaningful for prognostication.Sensitive outcomes to be incorporated in the lung allocation scoring system for individuals with CF are yet needed to catch rapid falls in functional capacity.

Prevalence and factors associated with urinary incontinence in females with cystic fibrosis: An Italian single-center cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) are deemed to have a higher risk of developing urinary incontinence (UI), likely due to repeated increasing pressure on the pelvic floor. We aimed to determine the prevalence of female UI in a large CF referral center, and to assess the association between UI and severity of CF disease. METHODS: We consecutively recruited female patients regularly attending our CF center, aged ≥6 years and with a confirmed diagnosis of CF. Prevalence, severity, and impact of UI were assessed by administering two validated questionnaires. Relationship between variables was evaluated by means of multiple correspondence analysis, whereas a logistic model was fitted to capture the statistical association between UI and independent variables. RESULTS: UI was present in 51/153 (33%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 26%-41%) females. Among children and adolescents, the prevalence was 12/82 (15%, 95% CI: 8%-25%) whereas among adults was 39/71 (55%, 95% CI: 43%-67%). The only explanatory variable associated with UI was age, with children presenting the lowest risk (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI: 0.05-0.93). Females presenting low or high nutritional status show higher profile risk of having UI. CONCLUSIONS: Stress UI is a common complication in females with CF since childhood. Although it frequently occurs in older patients with a more severe phenotype, much attention should be paid to adults and to their nutritional status.