From a teacher and school leader perspective: What happened with smoking rules and practices during a three-year smoking preventive intervention? - Findings from the X:IT II study.

BACKGROUND: School-based smoking preventive interventions are most effective if they consist of multiple components; one of them being strict anti-smoking rules, i.e., no smoking by anyone at any location during school hours. However, there is a lack of in-depth knowledge about how smoking practices and rules about smoking actually change over time. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine how smoking practices changed during a three-year period in which a smoking preventive intervention with strict anti-smoking rules was implemented at schools. METHODS: We used data from 46 Danish schools that were enrolled in the evaluation of the X:IT II study - a smoking preventive intervention with three main components: one of them being strict anti-smoking rules. We collected questionnaire data among school employees at four timepoints from the autumn of 2017 until April 2020. The questionnaire covered topics regarding students' and employees' tobacco patterns at the school, control with smoking, and aspects of the intervention delivery. RESULTS: Over time, student smoking rules got stricter; from three out of four at baseline to almost all schools having rules about no student smoking during school hours three years later. Employee smoking rules also changed, although not as much as student rules. Overall, smoking at school grounds seemed to decline - however, student smoking at other locations increased, hence, violating the rule about no smoking during school hours. Enforcement of smoking rules also increased over time. CONCLUSION: Although implementing and enforcing new rules in a school setting may be difficult, it seemed that most schools in the X:IT II study changed their rules and smoking practices for both students and employees over the three-year intervention period. It seemed, however, that students relocated their smoking to other places than the school or just outside school grounds. Implications of these findings are important to consider in future interventions, i.e., students leaving school during school hours to smoke and the physical separation between those who smoke and those who do not.

Tooth brushing among 11- to 15-year-olds in Denmark: combined effect of social class and migration status.

OBJECTIVE: Regular tooth brushing in adolescence predicts stable tooth brushing habits later in life. Differences in tooth brushing habits by ethnic background and socioeconomic position have been suggested. We investigated migration status and social class in relation to infrequent tooth brushing both separately and combined. METHODS: The study population was 11-15 year-olds chosen from a clustered random sample of schools. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses estimated the separate and combined effects of migration status and social class on less than twice daily tooth brushing. RESULTS: 10,607 respondents: a response rate of 88.3%. Boys of lower social class had higher odds ratio (OR) of infrequent tooth brushing than girls: 1.98 (95% confidence interval 1.62-2.41) vs 1.80 (1.53-2.24). Immigrants and descendants had higher odds compared to adolescents of Danish origin: immigrant boys OR 1.39 (1.05-1.89), girls OR 1.92 (1.47-2.50); descendant boys OR 2.53 (1.97-3.27), girls OR 2.56 (2.02-3.35). Analyses of the combined effect of social class and migration status showed that the social gradient in tooth brushing habits observed among ethnic Danes cannot be found among groups of immigrants and descendants. CONCLUSION: The study shows that both non-Danish origin and low social class increases the risk of infrequent tooth brushing among school-aged children. The study calls for in depth analyses of the processes which influence young people's tooth brushing habits. Further, there is a need to strengthen the promotion of appropriate tooth brushing habits of minority and low social class youths.