Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Europace ; 14(9): 1340-3, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22447957

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Isthmus-dependent (ID) clockwise (CW) atrial flutters (AFl) are rare in comparison with counterclockwise (CCW) AFl. Little is known about clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of CW AFl occurring after previous radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of CCW AFl. We sought to compare CW AFl de novo vs. CW AFl occurring after previous CCW AFl RF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 246 procedures of RF catheter ablation for AFl from January 2009 to January 2011 were reviewed. Clinical and electrophysiological data were analysed. Patients were excluded if they were in sinus rhythm at the beginning of the procedure, if they had concomitant/previous atrial fibrillation ablation, or if AFl was not ID. Twenty-seven patients presented CW AFl (10.9% of all ID AFl), including 10 CW AFl occurring after a previous RF catheter ablation for CCW AFl. Mean time for recurrence after the previous procedure of CCW AFl RF ablation was 3.5 years. They were younger (61.6 ± 11 years) than patients with CW AFl de novo (74.0 ± 7.2 years; P = 0.005). Bidirectional isthmus block was obtained in all patients. There was a significant difference in terms of double potential separation after ablation (155 ± 31 ms for CW AFl de novo vs. 111 ± 7 ms for recurrent CW AFl; P = 0.028). No differences were observed concerning CHADS score, AFl cycle length, and electrocardiogram typical pattern for CW AFl between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with CW AFl occurrence after CCW AFl RF catheter ablation are younger than patients with CW AFl de novo. They also have a smaller interspike interval after block completion.


Subject(s)
Atrial Flutter/surgery , Catheter Ablation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Flutter/physiopathology , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart Block/diagnosis , Heart Block/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 3(7): 673-81, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20633844

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the incidence, diagnostic value, and outcome of intracardiac masses observed by echocardiography after device removal. We hypothesized that these "ghosts" of leads could be associated with the diagnosis of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE). BACKGROUND: The echocardiographic appearance of residual floating masses in the right atrium after removal of permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators was recently described. However, the significance of these ghosts and their relationship with CDRIE are unknown. METHODS: The pre-operative clinical, microbiological, and echocardiographic conditions; the indication; and the removal technique were analyzed in a retrospective cohort including all consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous lead removal. Three groups were formed according to the final diagnosis: CDRIE, local device infection, and noninfectious indications. The incidence of ghosts was compared among the 3 groups. All clinical, infectious, and extraction-related factors were studied for their association with ghosts. All patients with ghosts were followed after hospitalization. RESULTS: Two hundred twelve patients underwent lead removal. Ghosts were observed in 17 patients (8% incidence), including 14 (16%) of 88 patients with CDRIE and 3 (5%) of 59 patients with local device infection. Ghosts were never observed among the remaining 65 noninfected patients. A significant association was found between CDRIE and the presence of a ghost (odds ratio: 7.63, 95% confidence interval: 2.12 to 27.45, p = 0.001). At 3 months, 2 patients with ghosts died suddenly, 2 underwent surgery, and 1 had a pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: Ghosts are observed in 8% of patients after percutaneous device extraction. Their presence is suggestive of device infection and seems to be associated with the diagnosis of CDRIE. The prognostic significance of such findings needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Device Removal , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Endocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chi-Square Distribution , Endocarditis/epidemiology , Endocarditis/microbiology , Endocarditis/therapy , Female , France , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Europace ; 11 Suppl 5: v29-31, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19861388

ABSTRACT

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment of heart failure in selected patients. However, with conventional CRT, notable left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling is achieved in only 60-70% of patients. This lack of effect of CRT might be due to incomplete resynchronization. In some patients, the paced activation front arising from a single LV electrode is unfavourable, possibly resulting in suboptimal resynchronization. Dual-site LV CRT has theoretical advantages in faster and more physiological LV activation. Some clinical evidence supports dual LV pacing. Nevertheless, a clear benefit of this pacing modality in patients chronically implanted is still unproved. A randomized study comparing single- and dual-site LV pacing, the Triple-Site Cardiac Resynchronization study of Patients with Heart Failure (TRUST CRT) is still ongoing.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/methods , Pacemaker, Artificial , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Electrodes, Implanted , Humans , Myocardial Contraction/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Remodeling/physiology
4.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 53(23): 2168-74, 2009 Jun 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19497444

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of traumatic tricuspid regurgitation (TTR) induced by percutaneous removal of chronically implanted transvenous leads. BACKGROUND: Although lead removal using modern tools has been shown to be highly effective and safe, TTR has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS: All patients undergoing ventricular lead removal at our center were studied. Lead removal was performed by simple traction, laser sheath, and/or lasso technique. Presence of a new TTR after removal was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. Pre-defined clinical and technical parameters were studied for their association with TTR. Patients were followed up by outpatient visits. RESULTS: We removed 237 ventricular leads in 208 patients. Median time from lead implantation was 46.4 months (range 0.7 to 260.5 months). A TTR occurred in 19 patients (9.1%), severe in 14. Three independent risk factors of TTR were found: use of laser sheath (p = 0.004), use of both laser sheath and lasso (p = 0.02), and female sex (p = 0.02). After a follow-up of 4,130 person-months (median 17.9 months), 5 TTR patients were medically treated for new right-sided heart failure symptoms, 2 had undergone surgical repair of the tricuspid valve, and 6 had died (2 from heart failure and 4 from noncardiac causes). Right-sided heart failure occurred only in patients with severe TTR. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that TTR is not uncommon after percutaneous lead removal. It is strongly associated with the use of additional tools beyond simple traction and also with female sex. In the long term, right-sided heart failure is frequent in patients with severe TTR.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Device Removal/adverse effects , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aged , Confidence Intervals , Device Removal/instrumentation , Echocardiography , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Heart Ventricles , Humans , Incidence , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology
5.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 102(2): 135-41, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19303581

ABSTRACT

Clinical trials in patients with pacemakers for sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block have highlighted the fact that desynchronization of ventricular contraction induced by right ventricular apical pacing is associated with long-term morbidity and mortality. These clinical data confirm pathophysiological results indicating that right ventricular apical pacing causes abnormal ventricular contraction, reduces pump function and leads to myocardial hypertrophy and ultrastructural abnormalities. In this manuscript, we discuss the clinical evidence for the adverse and beneficial effects of various right ventricular pacing sites, left ventricular pacing sites and biventricular pacing. We also propose a decisional algorithm for pacing modalities, based on atrioventricular conduction, left ventricular function and expected lifespan.


Subject(s)
Atrioventricular Block/therapy , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/methods , Algorithms , Atrioventricular Block/physiopathology , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/adverse effects , Evidence-Based Medicine , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Humans , Myocardial Contraction , Patient Selection , Risk Assessment , Sinoatrial Node/physiopathology , Stroke Volume , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left , Ventricular Function, Right
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...