[Issues and Solutions in Mental Health and Work: Managers Perspectives of a Large Health Organization]. / Enjeux et solutions en santé mentale et travail : le point de vue des gestionnaires d'une grande organisation de santé.

Mental health problems in the workplace represent an important issue for public organizations, particularly for people working in the health sector who have been confronted to multiple changes following the recent health system reform in Quebec. Managers need to take into consideration employee mental health within their organization in order to ensure productive and healthy employees. Managers are thus called upon to take on a role that includes prevention (e.g., detection of early warning signs), team management (e.g., working on recognition at work) and coaching employees in their tasks when returning to work following a sick leave due to a common mental disorder (e.g., depression). Although there is an abundant literature on the manager's role in the prevention of mental health problems in the workplace and the work rehabilitation of employees on sick leave due to a common mental disorder, to our knowledge, little research has been conducted on these issues regarding managers' perceptions working in large health organizations. Furthermore, potential solutions have not been explored in this context. Objective The purpose of the study is to document, from the managers' perspective within a large health organization in Quebec, the issues pertaining to mental health and work (from prevention to work rehabilitation), and the solutions to deal with them. Method As part of a participatory research project, researchers and collaborators of a large health organization conducted focus groups with managers on the theme of mental health and work: issues and solutions. A total of 83 managers spread out in 10 focus groups participated in this study. Results From these focus groups, 6 broad categories of issues related to mental health in the workplace emerged: 1) the management framework, 2) human, financial, material and information resource management, 3) management of mental health and tools, 4), stakeholders' collaboration, roles and actions, 5) employees' sense of belonging to the organization and, 6) work-life balance. From these broad conceptual categories, 23 specific issues and associated solutions emerged. Conclusions From this study, the general consensus was the need to have access to a series of tools (e.g., toolbox) in order to assist managers across the different steps, from sick-leave prevention, to rehabilitation and return to work. The results also highlighted the need to better define the roles of each stakeholder in this process. These results bring a new light to the issues and potential solutions perceived by managers dealing with mental health and work issues in a large health organization. These results could eventually be replicated in other settings or large organizations.

Stakeholders' Role and Actions in the Return-to-Work Process of Workers on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review.

The lack of knowledge regarding the roles and actions of return to work (RTW) stakeholders create confusion and uncertainty about how and when to RTW after experiencing a common mental disorder (CMD). Purpose The purpose of this scoping review is to disentangle the various stakeholders' role and actions in the RTW process of workers on sick-leave due to CMDs. The research question is: What is documented in the existing literature regarding the roles and actions of the identified stakeholders involved in the RTW process of workers on sick-leave due to CMDs? Methods In conducting this scoping review, we followed Arksey and O'Malley's (Int J Soc Res Methodol 8:19-32, 2005) methodology, consisting of different stages (e.g., charting the data by categorizing key results). Results 3709 articles were screened for inclusion, 243 of which were included for qualitative synthesis. Several RTW stakeholders (n=11) were identified (e.g., workers on sick leave due to CMDs, managers, union representatives, rehabilitation professionals, insurers, return to work coordinators). RTW stakeholders' roles and actions inter- and intra-system were recommended, either general (e.g., know and understand the perspectives of all RTW stakeholders) or specific to an actor (e.g., the return to work coordinator needs to create and maintain a working alliance between all RTW stakeholders). Furthermore, close to 200 stakeholders' actions, spread out on different RTW phases, were recommended for facilitating the RTW process. Conclusions Eleven RTW stakeholders from the work, heath and insurance systems have been identified, as well as their respective roles and actions. Thanks to these results, RTW stakeholders and policy makers will be able to build practical relationships and collaboration regarding the RTW of workers on sick leave due to CMDs.

Return-to-Work Following Depression: What Work Accommodations Do Employers and Human Resources Directors Put in Place?

The magnitude of economic and social costs related to common mental disorders has a profound impact on the workplace. Returning to work following depression is, therefore, a major issue for all stakeholders involved (employee, employer, human resources director, union, physician, etc.). Considering their role in the organization, Human Resources Directors (HRD) and employers have a decisive impact on the return-to-work (RTW) process. Purpose This study aims to determine which RTW accommodations are implemented, following depression, by one of the central stakeholders: HRD and employers. Methods 219 HRD/employers participated in a semi-structured telephone interview about RTW of employees after depression. From that interview, the question related to this article was: Do you put in place work accommodations for employees after a sick leave due to depression (yes or no)? If their response was positive, we asked: If yes, what were the work accommodations? Results 170 HRD/employers specified accommodations. The most common categories identified were related to: work schedule, task modifications, job change and work environment change. Accommodations directly related to the employee or the colleagues were considerably less mentioned and those concerning other RTW stakeholders, including supervisor, were almost absent. Conclusion Our results suggest that accommodations directly related to work aspects seemed to predominate in our sample of HRD/employers when an employee returned-to-work following depression. The relational aspect and the involvement of the different stakeholders are also not prioritized to accommodate the RTW. These results contrast with employer best practice guidelines for the RTW of workers with common mental disorders.

L-carnosine as an enhancer to computerized cognitive behaviour therapy in Japanese workers, an unjustified claim.

This letter comments on the conclusion drawn by Shirotsuki et al. (2017) in their article entitled "The effect for Japanese workers of a self-help computerized cognitive behaviour therapy program with a supplement soft drink", recently published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine. The authors concluded that their drink, containing L-carnosine, enhances the effects of a computerized cognitive-behavioural therapy (CCBT) on the psychological well-being of healthy Japanese workers. Yet, we argue that their conclusion is unfounded given their results and the methodological shortcomings of their study. Briefly, while the authors reported improvement on the tension-anxiety subscale of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) in the CCBT only group, they also observed a lack of improvement on this subscale in the CCBT+L-carnosine group suggesting that the drink washes out this beneficial effect of CCBT. Methodological issues include the uncontrolled levels of L-carnosine metabolized by participants jeopardize the study's internal validity. Also, the clinical meaningfulness of the findings seems dubious as post-treatment scores remained within the range of the general Japanese population. Consequently, we argue that Shirotsuki et al.'s study should be re-conducted before drawing any valid conclusion.