Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
World Neurosurg ; 184: 165-174, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38266992

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the frequency of intraoperative complication rates related to access surgery, operating time, and intraoperative bleeding rates described in the literature for patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) to evaluate the adverse effects and, thus, help in therapeutic decision making and contribute to future clinical trials. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of MEDLINE and Embase databases in March 2023. The main inclusion criteria were adult patients aged >18 years, with no maximum age limit; the use of ALIF; the presence of quantitative data on intraoperative complications; and randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Vascular and peritoneal injuries were considered primary endpoints. The operative time and intraoperative bleeding rate were secondary endpoints. Reports and case series, case-control series, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. RESULTS: Eight studies were included with a total of 2395 patients. We found important quantitative data for future randomized clinical studies involving ALIF surgery, including the rate of vascular lesions (2.79%) and peritoneal lesions (0.37%). In addition to these factors, only 4 of the 8 studies addressed the average surgery time, with a total average of 145.61 minutes. Furthermore, 6 of the 8 articles reported the mean rate of intraoperative bleeding, with a total mean blood loss of 272.75 mL. CONCLUSIONS: ALIF is a lumbar spine access technique with low intraoperative complications. Patients with contraindications have a higher risk of complications. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of the procedure.


Subject(s)
Spinal Fusion , Adult , Humans , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Clin Med ; 10(11)2021 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34070857

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper is to summarise our own and to review published experience regarding the long-term outcome of intravitreal treatment for macular neovascularisation (MNV) secondary to Sorsby's fundus dystrophy (SFD). A systematic literature search using the MeSH terms [Sorsby] and [anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)] was conducted in NCBI/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify publications reporting anti-VEGF treatment outcomes in SFD. Treatment outcomes were extracted for this meta-analysis from 14 publications and an own patient reporting a total of 31 cases with a mean follow-up (FU) of 54 months. Both eyes were affected in ten (32.3%) instances. Heterogenous reporting limited the comparability of the outcomes. All papers in common, however, reported satisfied to excellent responses to anti-VEGF therapy if patients were diagnosed and treated immediately after onset of symptoms. Of 20 eyes, for which visual acuity was reported before and after treatment, five worsened and seven improved by more than 1 line, whereas eight eyes maintained their function by end of the follow up, and 11 eyes (55%) maintained a driving vision (Snellen VA ≥ 0.5). Of six eyes with a VA < 0.5, VA improved in one to VA ≥ 0.5, whereas of 14 eyes with an initial VA ≥ 0.5, this dropped to <0.5 despite therapy. In MNV secondary to SFD, the delay between first symptoms and access to anti-VEGF treatment determines subretinal scar formation and thereby, functional prognosis. If treated early, this is generally favourable under regular controls and a consequent anti-VEGF treatment of MNV activity.

4.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 236(4): 551-554, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30919402

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare 4 optical coherence tomography-angiography (OCT-A) devices for foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements in healthy subjects. METHODS: The central retinas of 24 eyes of 12 healthy subjects were scanned with 4 different OCT-A devices (Optovue RTVue-XR, Zeiss Cirrus 5000-HD-OCT, a prototype Spectralis OCT2, Heidelberg Engineering, and Topcon DRI-OCT Triton Swept-source OCT). For the Topcon, Zeiss, and Optovue devices, 3-mm and 6-mm scans were performed. The Heidelberg device only provided 4-mm scans. En-face OCT-A images of the superficial and deep capillary plexus of the macular area were generated. The FAZ areas were measured and compared. RESULTS: Twenty-four healthy eyes were included. OCT-A devices showed significant differences in FAZ measurements. The Zeiss OCT-A device measured the smallest values for foveal avascular area (mean 218.7 mm2), followed by the Optovue device (229.6 mm2), the Topcon device (239.3 mm2), and the Heidelberg device (250.4 mm2). Differences were statistically significant for following devices: Heidelberg versus Optovue (p < 0.001), Heidelberg versus Zeiss (p < 0.001), Topcon versus Zeiss (p < 0.001), and Optovue versus Zeiss (p = 0.046). For the Optovue device, FAZ measurements were significantly different between 3 mm (mean 220 mm2) and 6 mm (mean 239.3 mm2, p = 0.007) scans. All other devices showed no significant difference within scan modes. CONCLUSION: Current OCT-A devices provide images that allow such measurements, but values showed significant differences between devices and, for the Optovue instrument, even within scan modes. The data for OCTA measurements cannot be transferred interchangeably between the devices. Therefore, a patient should always be measured with the same device.


Subject(s)
Fovea Centralis , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Angiography , Fovea Centralis/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Retina
5.
Neurosignals ; 20(1): 1-14, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21952616

ABSTRACT

The focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase abundantly expressed in the mammalian brain and highly enriched in neuronal growth cones. Inhibitory and facilitatory activities of FAK on neuronal growth have been reported and its role in neuritic outgrowth remains controversial. Unlike other tyrosine kinases, such as the neurotrophin receptors regulating neuronal growth and plasticity, the relevance of FAK for learning and memory in vivo has not been clearly defined yet. A comprehensive study aimed at determining the role of FAK in neuronal growth, neurotransmitter release and synaptic plasticity in hippocampal neurons and in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory was therefore undertaken using the mouse model. Gain- and loss-of-function experiments indicated that FAK is a critical regulator of hippocampal cell morphology. FAK mediated neurotrophin-induced neuritic outgrowth and FAK inhibition affected both miniature excitatory postsynaptic potentials and activity-dependent hippocampal long-term potentiation prompting us to explore the possible role of FAK in spatial learning and memory in vivo. Our data indicate that FAK has a growth-promoting effect, is importantly involved in the regulation of the synaptic function and mediates in vivo hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory.


Subject(s)
Focal Adhesion Kinase 1/physiology , Maze Learning/physiology , Memory/physiology , Neurogenesis/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Synapses/physiology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Hippocampus/cytology , Hippocampus/enzymology , Hippocampus/physiology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Neurons/enzymology , Neurons/physiology , Organ Culture Techniques , Synapses/enzymology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...