Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 99(4): F278-81, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24596406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Administration of oxygen in the delivery room is informed by oxygen saturation (SpO2). An oxygen saturation range of 60%-70% is the threshold for administering oxygen in the first minutes after birth. The accuracy of newer generation oximeters to measure SpO2 has not been compared against the 'gold standard', direct arterial blood oxygen saturation (SaO2) when SaO2 is low. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and precision of Nellcor and Masimo oximeters to measure SpO2 when SaO2 <70%. METHOD: Prospective observational study in ventilated anaesthetised newborn lambs with an indwelling carotid artery catheter. Ventilation was adjusted to achieve hypoxaemia. Nellcor (Oxi-Max 600 with Max-N sensor) and Masimo (Rad 4 with low noise optical probe (LNOP) sensor) sensors were applied to the right forelimb (preductal). An arterial blood sample was collected at 1-5 min intervals when the animal was hypoxic. The displayed SpO2 was recorded. We used Bland-Altman analysis to determine precision and accuracy of each oximeter when SaO2 <70%. RESULTS: 17 lambs were studied, 165 measurements were obtained, 123 were SaO2 <70%. The mean difference (±1.96 SD) Nellcor SpO2-SaO2 when SaO2 <70% was 17% (-12% to 46%). The mean difference (±1.96 SD) Masimo SpO2-SaO2 when SaO2 <70% was 13% (-19% to 45%). CONCLUSIONS: At SaO2<70%, both monitors overestimated oxygen saturation (SpO2) compared with the gold standard. Both oximeters were equally inaccurate when SaO2 was low.


Subject(s)
Hypoxia/diagnosis , Oximetry/instrumentation , Oxygen/blood , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Disease Models, Animal , Hypoxia/blood , Hypoxia/therapy , Oximetry/methods , Oximetry/standards , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Sheep, Domestic
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 25 Suppl 4: 63-5, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22958020

ABSTRACT

Few years ago, elective tracheal intubation in the delivery room was considered as the routine approach in managing respiratory failure in extremely-low-birth-weight infants (ELBW), at least in terms of surfactant administration. Over recent years, the indications and principles of neonatal resuscitation of ELBW infants have been partially reviewed: many randomized clinical trials (RCT) have demonstrated that these infants do not die quickly without intubation in the delivery room, and many infants only need a little help in completing foetal-neonatal transition through the use of lung recruitment manoeuvres in the delivery room (e.g. sustained lung inflation, CPAP) and then only non-invasive ventilation support. Tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation can be reserved solely for depressed or ELBW, although further RCTs are needed to provide additional information and to provide a conclusive response to the eternal debate as to whether intubation at birth can influence outcome for ELBW infants.


Subject(s)
Delivery Rooms , Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/therapy , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight/physiology , Infant, Newborn , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Resuscitation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...