Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 48(4): 301-4, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19660845

ABSTRACT

We aimed to find out whether dental practitioners take specific measures to identify patients who are at risk of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jawbones; how oral and maxillofacial surgery units in the United Kingdom manage patients who have had radiotherapy and require dental extractions, and the evidence behind current practice. We sent postal questionnaires to 60 dentists and 117 maxillofacial units. Dentists were questioned about measures used to identify radiotherapy patients, and use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Maxillofacial units were questioned about the existence of written protocols and the measures used to minimise the risk of ORN. Thirty-five percent of dentists questioned ask specifically about head and neck cancer or radiotherapy as part of their medical history, and 5% of maxillofacial units questioned had written protocols for the management of patients who had had radiotherapy or had previously been diagnosed with ORN. Prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for patients at risk of ORN by 16% of dentists and 81% of maxillofacial units. Preoperative mouthwash is recommended by 59% of maxillofacial units. Identification of patients at risk of ORN is the first step in prevention but it is not done efficiently at present. Recommendations include the use of preoperative mouthwash and prophylactic antibiotics. Operations should be atraumatic and should be done by experienced clinicians.


Subject(s)
Dental Care/methods , Jaw Diseases/diagnosis , Osteoradionecrosis/diagnosis , Practice Patterns, Dentists' , Surgery, Oral , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Clinical Protocols , Consultants , Dental Service, Hospital , Dental Staff, Hospital , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Jaw Diseases/prevention & control , Medical History Taking , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Osteoradionecrosis/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tooth Extraction , United Kingdom
2.
Oral Oncol ; 44(11): 1009-13, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18485795

ABSTRACT

Carotid artery disease is a common condition which, like head and neck cancer, is primarily smoking related. Internal carotid stenosis may result in cerebro-vascular complications, while severe stenosis of the external carotid can potentially compromise microvascular free tissue transfer reconstruction. We were interested to see whether any co-existing carotid artery disease could be assessed on the neck CT scan by comparing it to definitive duplex scanning in head and neck cancer patients. CT and duplex scanning of the common, internal and external carotid arteries was compared in 30 patients (180 vessels). The arterial phase of the neck CT scans were reviewed by two radiologists and all duplex scans were performed by one vascular technician to minimise inter-operator variability. The respective findings were blinded. Significant correlations were found between CT and duplex in confirming stenosis of the common and internal carotid arteries (P<0.001). There was a weak correlation between CT and duplex in the assessment of the external carotid system (P=0.02 and P=0.08), with CT under-estimating the true extent of stenosis in this vessel. The sensitivity and specificity of CT compared to duplex was 77% and 94% respectively. CT is useful not only for imaging the neck of head and neck cancer patients, but also in screening for carotid stenosis. Duplex scanning is more accurate than CT in assessing the external artery, and is useful for evaluating patients with significant stenosis of the carotid tree.


Subject(s)
Carotid Artery, External , Carotid Artery, Internal , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carotid Artery, Common/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery, External/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery, Internal/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/complications , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex/methods , Young Adult
3.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 33(5): 340-1, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16129611

ABSTRACT

A rare clinical variant found during neck dissection surgery is reported in which the spinal accessory nerve divided at a high level in the neck, before entering the sternocleidomastoid muscle. This case documents the need for meticulous technique in identification and dissection of the spinal accessory nerve in order to reduce the risk of postoperative morbidity.


Subject(s)
Accessory Nerve/anatomy & histology , Neck Dissection/methods , Neck Muscles/innervation , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Jugular Veins/anatomy & histology , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Neck Muscles/blood supply , Neoplasms, Second Primary/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...