Real-world dosimetric comparison between CyberKnife SBRT and HDR brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are currently the two treatment options for definitive radiotherapy of prostate cancer, employing extreme hypofractionation. There are only very few studies comparing their dosimetry, all using computed tomography for treatment planning. We present here a real-word dosimetric comparison between SBRT and ultrasound-based virtual HDR-BRT, with both imaging modalities coming from the same patient. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with prostate cancer on a prospective trial evaluating the toxicity of robotic-based SBRT were treated to a total dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Fifteen patients were included in this analysis. During ultrasound-based fiducial implantation, a three-dimensional data set as in real HDR-BRT procedure was acquired. Virtual HDR-BRT plans were generated and various organs at risk and prostate dosimetric parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Concerning prostate, SBRT achieved significant higher D98, V35 Gy, and V37.5 Gy coverage, whereas virtual HDR-BRT achieved significant higher intratumoral doses reflected in the V42 Gy and V52.5 Gy. Rectal Dmax, V36 Gy, and V29 Gy were significantly lower for HDR-BRT with no difference as for V18 Gy. SBRT was significantly inferior regarding bladder dosimetry (Dmax, V36 Gy, V18 Gy), whereas urethra Dmax and V44 Gy where significantly higher at the expense of HDR-BRT. CONCLUSIONS: HDR-BRT is superior regarding rectum and bladder dosimetry, with SBRT being superior relative to urethra dosimetry. A randomized study is warranted to define the best extreme hypofractionated modality.

Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiotherapy for brain metastases using Gamma Knife and CyberKnife: a dual-center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hFSRT) to tumor cavities is emerging as a new standard of care after resection of brain metastases. Both Gamma Knife (GK) and CyberKnife (CK) are modalities commonly used for stereotactic radiotherapy, but fractional schemes are not consistent. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients receiving postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy of resected brain metastases (BM) using different fractionation schedules and modalities in two large centers. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed BM who underwent postoperative SRS or hFSRT with either GK or CK at two large cancer centers were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed local control (LC), regional control (RC) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: From 04/14 to 05/18 79 patients with 81 resection cavities were treated. Forty-seven patients (59.5%) received GK and 32 patients (40.5%) received CK treatment. Fifty-four cavities (66.7%) were treated with hFSRT and 27 (33.3%) with SRS. The most common hFSRT and SRS scheme was 3x10 Gy and 1x16 Gy, respectively. Median OS was 11.7 months with survival rates of 44.7% at 1 year and 18.5% at 2 years. LC was 83.3% after 1 year. Median time to regional progression was 12.0 months with RC rates of 61.1% at 6 months and 41.0% at 12 months. There was no difference in OS, LC or RC between GK and CK treatments or SRS and hFSRT. CONCLUSIONS: Both SRS and hFSRT provide high local control rates in resected BM regardless of the applied modality.