Disease Behavior and Treatment Response of Special Histological Types of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Special histological types (SHT) of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are a heterogeneous group of rare poorly understood diseases. We aimed to evaluate the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of patients with SHT of TNBC. METHODS: We evaluated patients with a SHT of TNBC treated in a cancer center between 2009 and 2020. The endpoints were characterization of clinical and pathological features, pathologic complete response (PCR) rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The 132 patients included had the following histologies: metaplastic (n=71), medullary pattern (n=14), lobular (n=12), adenoid cystic (n=12), apocrine (n=10), and others (n=13). Metaplastic, lobular, and medullary pattern tumors had higher grade (66.6-85.7% grade 3); adenoid cystic and apocrine had mainly grade 1-2 (70-83.3%). Metaplastic and lobular carcinomas had higher disease stages (47.8% and 58.2% stages III-IV). PCR rates were 10.3% for metaplastic and 33.3% for lobular carcinomas, with 5-year DFS rates of 56% and 51.4%. Medullary pattern carcinomas had a great response to treatment, with PCR rate of 100%, and 5-year DFS rate of 92.8%. Apocrine carcinomas also had favorable prognosis, with no recurrence after early disease treatment, and 5-year DFS rate of 83.3%. Adenoid cystic carcinomas had intermediate prognosis, with 5-year DFS rate of 66.6%. CONCLUSION: SHT of TNBC encompasses heterogeneous malignancies with distinct behaviors. Lobular and metaplastic carcinomas showed high aggressiveness and poor treatment response, while medullary pattern and apocrine carcinomas had favorable outcomes. Treatment strategies focus on molecular features of each of these diseases are warranted.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of Oncotype DX from a Brazilian private medicine perspective: a GBECAM multicenter retrospective study.

Background: Oncotype DX (ODX) is a validated assay for the prediction of risk of recurrence and benefit of chemotherapy (CT) in both node negative (N0) and 1-3 positive nodes (N1), hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (eBC). Due to limited access to genomic assays in Brazil, treatment decisions remain largely driven by traditional clinicopathologic risk factors. ODX has been reported to be cost-effective in different health system, but limited data are available considering the reality of middle-income countries such as Brazil. We aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ODX across strata of clinical risk groups using data from a dataset of patients from Brazilian institutions. Methods: Clinicopathologic and ODX information were analyzed for patients with T1-T3, N0-N1, HR+/HER2- eBC who had an ODX performed between 2005 and 2020. Projections of CT indication by clinicopathologic criteria were based on binary clinical risk categorization based on the Adjuvant! Algorithm. The ODX score was correlated with the indication of CT according to TAILORx and RxPONDER data. Two decision-tree models were developed. In the first model, low and high clinical risk patients were included while in the second, only high clinical risk patients were included. The cost for ODX and CT was based on the Brazilian private medicine perspective. Results: In all, 645 patients were analyzed; 411 patients (63.7%) had low clinical risk and 234 patients (36.3%) had high clinical risk disease. The ODX indicated low (<11), intermediate (11-25), and high (>25) risk in 119 (18.4%), 415 (64.3%), and 111 (17.2%) patients, respectively. Among 645 patients analyzed in the first model, ODX was effective (5.6% reduction in CT indication) though with an incremental cost of United States Dollar (US$) 2288.87 per patient. Among 234 patients analyzed in the second model (high clinical risk only), ODX led to a 57.7% reduction in CT indication and reduced costs by US$ 4350.66 per patient. Conclusions: Our study suggests that ODX is cost-saving for patients with high clinical risk HR+/HER2- eBC and cost-attractive for the overall population in the Brazilian private medicine perspective. Its incorporation into routine practice should be strongly considered by healthcare providers.

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Patients With Brain Metastases From Colorectal Cancer-Who Are These Patients?

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are unusual; however, an increase in incidence has been reported. The evidence available on the subject is scarce, and a better understanding is warranted. We aimed to characterize the epidemiology and the outcomes of patients with BMs from CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of patients with BMs from CRC was retrospectively evaluated. Patients were treated in a single center between May 2008 and April 2019. BMs were confirmed by brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: A total of 247 consecutive patients were evaluated. Most patients had a left-sided primary tumor (193, 78%) and at least two extra-cranial metastatic sites (194, 78%). Ninety-six patients (39%) were RAS wild-type; 68 patients (27%) were RAS mutated; and 83 patients (34%) were not characterized. Median time from the initial diagnosis to BMs was 27.6 months (interquartile range, 13.1-46.9). Regarding local therapy, 43 patients (17.4%) were treated with BM surgery alone, 76 patients (30.8%) with radiotherapy (RT) alone, and 58 patients (23.5%) with both surgery and RT. Median overall survival (OS) was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-3.5). Six-month and 1-year OS rates were 29% (95% CI, 23-25) and 13.5% (95% CI, 9.2-18.6), respectively. In a multivariable analysis, BM surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; P = .018), RT alone (HR, 0.51; P = .001), and surgery plus RT (HR, 0.27; P < .001) were associated with superior OS, whereas Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 3 or 4 (HR, 2.01; P = .009) and male gender (HR, 1.46; P = .012) were negative prognostic factors. RAS status was not associated with OS. CONCLUSION: BMs occur late during the course of colorectal cancer and are more common in patients with a left-sided primary tumor and a high volume of metastatic disease. BMs from colorectal cancer are still associated with an extremely poor prognosis; however, selected patients may benefit from treatment with surgical resection and radiotherapy.