Exploring Staffing Levels in Adult Day Services: Does Profit Status Matter?

OBJECTIVE: For more than 4 decades, adult day service centers (ADSCs) have provided long-term care services and socialization to hundreds of thousands of people in the United States. An important part of the long-term care continuum, ADSCs serve older adults and adults with disabilities, many of whom have low incomes and are racial and ethnic minorities. Yet, little is known about the quality of ADSCs. To better understand ADSC quality, we examined staffing levels, a key aspect of organizational structure. Staffing levels are an established quality measure associated with resident outcomes in nursing homes. Our study compares ADSC staffing levels between for-profit and nonprofit or government-operated ADSCs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional secondary data analysis using a nationally representative survey of ADSCs. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult day service center (n = 573) directors completed a survey as part of the 2018 National Study of Long-Term Care Providers. METHODS: Bivariate comparisons and multivariate linear regression were used to compare staffing, measured as hours per participant day in nonprofit and for-profit ADSCs. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of ADSCs in the sample were nonprofit or government-operated and the remainder were for-profit. For-profit ADSC staffing averaged 1.5 hours per participant day and nonprofit or government-operated ADSC staffing averaged 1.9 hours per participant day. For-profit ADSCs had 15.8% (P = .047) lower hours per participant day compared with nonprofit ADSCs after controlling for center characteristics, such as Medicaid use, participant acuity, and ADSC size. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We found that for-profit ADSCs have lower staffing levels compared with nonprofit and government-operated ADSCs. Future research is needed to understand how staffing levels relates to the quality of care in for-profit and nonprofit ADSCs and how these relationships vary by participant characteristics, such as income, race/ethnicity, and acuity.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Older Primary Care Patients and Their Family Members.

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced mandatory stay-at-home orders and concerns about contracting a virus that impacted the physical and mental health of much of the world's population. This study compared the rates of depression and anxiety in a sample of older primary care patients (aged ≥65 years old) and their family members recruited for a clinical trial before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were dyads enrolled in the Caregiver Outcomes of Alzheimer's Disease Screening (COADS) trial, which included 1,809 dyads of older primary care patients and one of their family members. Mean scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) were measured and compared before and during the pandemic. We found no difference in depression and anxiety among dyads of older primary care patients and their family members recruited before and during COVID-19. Additionally, we found that older primary care patients and family members who reported their income as comfortable had significantly lower depression and anxiety compared to those who reported having not enough to make ends meet. Along with this, older primary care patients with a high school education or less were more likely to have anxiety compared to those with a postgraduate degree. Moreover, our findings support the notion that certain demographics of older primary care patients and family members are at a higher risk for depression and anxiety, indicating who should be targeted for psychological health interventions that can be adapted during COVID-19. Future research should continue monitoring older primary care patients and their family members through the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic.