Extent of pulmonary thromboembolic disease in patients with COVID-19 on CT: relationship with pulmonary parenchymal disease.

AIM: To report the severity and extent of pulmonary thromboembolic disease (PTD) in COVID-19 patients undergoing computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in a tertiary centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of COVID-19 patients undergoing CTPA over a period of 27 days. The presence, extent, and severity of PTD were documented. Two observers scored the pattern and extent of lung parenchymal disease including potential fibrotic features, as well as lymph node enlargement and pleural effusions. Consensus was achieved via a third observer. Interobserver agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. Student's t-test, chi-squared, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare imaging features between PTD and non-PTD sub-groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 100 patients with confirmed COVID-19 underwent CTPA imaging. Ninety-three studies were analysed, excluding indeterminate CTPA examinations. Overall incidence of PTD was 41/93 (44%) with 28/93 patients showing small vessel PTD (30%). D-dimer was elevated in 90/93 (96.8%) cases. A high Wells' score did not differentiate between PTD and non-PTD groups (p=0.801). The interobserver agreement was fair (kappa=0.659) for parenchymal patterns and excellent (kappa=0.816) for severity. Thirty-four of the 93 cases (36.6%) had lymph node enlargement; 29/34 (85.3%) showed no additional source of infection. Sixteen of the 93 (17.2%) cases had potential fibrotic features. CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of PTD in COVID-19 patients undergoing CTPA and lack of a risk stratification tool. The present data indicates a higher suspicion of PTD is needed in severe COVID-19 patients. The concomitant presence of possible fibrotic features on CT indicates the need for follow-up.

An audit of mammographic screen detected lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) diagnosed on initial image guided needle biopsy: how has our practice changed over 10 years?

AIM: To review all cases of B3 lesion diagnosed at initial image-guided needle biopsy over two 5-year cohorts to identify upgrade rates to malignancy and the effect of changing guidance on the management of such lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively. Mammographic features, biopsy type and management were recorded for each lesion. Upgrade rates for each B3 histological category were quantified. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. RESULTS: There were 224 cases in 2005-2010 and 240 cases in 2010-2015. Mammographically 211 lesions were microcalcifications, 182 masses, 65 distortions and six asymmetric densities with no difference in the mammographic features in the two cohorts. Two hundred and eight 14 G core biopsies and 256 initial vacuum-assisted biopsies were performed. There was a statistically significant reduction in benign surgical biopsies and an increase in second-line vacuum biopsy/excision in the latter cohort, with no significant change in the upgrade rate. There was an overall 6% upgrade to invasive malignancy and 13% upgrade to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The upgrade rates for the following histological categories were atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (AIDEP) 33.2% (21/63); classical (not pleomorphic) in situ lobular neoplasia (ISLN) 18.2% (6/33); flat epithelial hyperplasia (FEA) 21.7% (20/92); papilloma with atypia 53.8% (7/13), without atypia 12.1% (8/66); and radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion with atypia 16.7% (2/12), and without atypia 7.9% (6/76). CONCLUSION: Upgrade rates remain high for some histological categories even with first-line use of vacuum biopsy. Management of borderline lesions should be considered carefully in a multidisciplinary meeting. In many cases, the need for diagnostic surgical excision has been replaced by image-guided vacuum sampling.

Role of tomosynthesis in breast imaging going forward.

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a modified mammographic technique that overcomes some of the limitations of full-field digital mammography (2DDM) by eliminating the effect of overlapping breast tissue. In the UK, DBT is utilised in both the symptomatic setting and in breast screening assessment clinics. A literature search was conducted from 2010-2017 to ensure that the most recent developments in DBT technology, clinical applications, and assessment of its usefulness in breast screening were reviewed. Technological advances in DBT include the addition of synthetic 2D mammograms, which are generated from the DBT data set, and the use of DBT to guide vacuum-assisted biopsy and excisions. The units from each vendor vary in several aspects, which are detailed in this article. DBT improves diagnostic accuracy and reader confidence when identifying benign and malignant lesions. It has also been shown to be more accurate than 2DDM in assessing tumour size and in the assessment of multifocal tumours. In the screening setting, retrospective reader studies have shown that the addition of DBT to 2DDM showed equivalent or an improvement in sensitivity and specificity when compared to 2DDM alone. Many of these trials showed an increase in invasive cancer detection and a reduction in recall rates. Large prospective randomised controlled trials conducted in Europe and North America will evaluate effectiveness, practicalities, and cost implications of utilising DBT in routine breast screening practice.