Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health ; 50(1): 33-39, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29443434

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Access to abortion care in the United States varies according to multiple factors, including location, state regulation and provider availability. In 2013, California enacted a law that authorized nurse practitioners (NPs), certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) and physician assistants (PAs) to provide first-trimester aspiration abortions; little is known about organizations' experiences in implementing this policy change. METHODS: Beginning 10 and 24 months after implementation of the new law, semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 administrators whose five organizations trained and employed NPs, CNMs and PAs as providers of aspiration abortions. Interview data on the organizations' experiences were analyzed thematically, and facilitators of and barriers to implementation were identified. RESULTS: Administrators were committed to the provision of aspiration abortions by NPs, CNMs and PAs, and nearly all identified improved access to care and complication management as clear benefits of the policy change. However, integration of the new providers was uneven and depended on a variety of circumstances. Organizational disincentives included financial and logistical costs incurred in trying to deploy and integrate the different types of providers. Some administrators found that increased costs were outweighed by improved patient care, whereas others did not. In general, having a strong administrative champion within the organization made a critical difference. CONCLUSIONS: California's expansion of the abortion-providing workforce had a positive impact on patient care in the sampled organizations. However, various organizational obstacles must be addressed to more fully realize the benefits of having NPs, CNMs and PAs provide aspiration abortions.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Legal/statistics & numerical data , Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Legal/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Legal/methods , California , Female , Health Plan Implementation/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Nurse Midwives/legislation & jurisprudence , Nurse Practitioners/legislation & jurisprudence , Physician Assistants/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Qualitative Research
2.
Reprod Health Matters ; 23(45): 90-2, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26278836

ABSTRACT

In 2013 California passed legislation that expanded the pool of eligible aspiration abortion providers to include advanced practice nurses, nurse-midwives, and physician-assistants. This law, enacted in 2014, is based on evidence generated by the Health Workforce Pilot Project #171, which examined the safety and effectiveness of aspiration abortion care provided by these clinicians as well as patient acceptability and satisfaction. This evidence and the resulting policy change build on international research and established workforce strategies used to expand access to safe abortion services for women worldwide, representing a radical departure from the legislative trend of constricting access in the United States.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Nurse Midwives/legislation & jurisprudence , Nurse Practitioners/legislation & jurisprudence , Physician Assistants/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Induced/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Induced/methods , Attitude to Health , California , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...