The role of STATs in apoptosis.

Signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) are transcription factors that mediate cytokine and growth factor induced signals that culminate in various biological responses, including proliferation and differentiation. Recent studies indicate a role for STATs in apoptosis as well. Depending upon the particular stimulus or cell type, STATs can mediate either pro-apoptotic signals or anti-apoptotic signals. STAT1 and, under some circums-tances. STAT3 are important for transducing pro-apoptotic signals whereas STAT3 and STAT5 have been implicated in promoting cell survival. Recent studies demonstrate that regulation of apoptotic pathways by STATs is largely due to transcriptional activation of genes that encode proteins that mediate or trigger the cell death process, such as Bcl-xL, caspases, Fas and TRAIL as well as those that regulate cell cycle progression, such as p21waf1. Interestingly, STAT proteins may also regulate apoptosis through a non-transcriptional mechanism by inhibiting the anti-apoptotic protein NF-kappaB. Considering that dysregulation of the STAT signaling pathway is commonly found in clinical tumor samples, understanding the mechanisms underlying STAT regulation of cell survival may lead to successful strategies for targeting STATs in cancer therapy.

CD40 activation of carcinoma cells increases expression of adhesion and major histocompatibility molecules but fails to induce either CD80/CD86 expression or T cell alloreactivity.

A major obstacle for the development of cancer immunotherapy is the poor capacity of most tumor cells to present antigen. It has previously been shown that ligation of CD40 on the surface of malignant B cells results in the induction of efficient antigen presentation primarily because of upregulated expression of MHC, costimulatory, and adhesion molecules. Ongoing clinical trials are testing the impact of CD40 ligation as immunotherapy for B cell malignancies. Because CD40 is also widely expressed in carcinomas, we studied whether CD40 activation of these cells using soluble recombinant trimeric human CD40 ligand (srhCD40L) can also induce T cell responses. Here, we show that carcinoma cells upregulate expression of CD54 and MHC molecules following in vitro exposure to srhCD40L but do not upregulate CD80 or CD86. CD40-activated carcinoma cells failed to trigger mixed lymphocyte reactions, in sharp contrast to CD40-activated lymphoma cells for which CD40 activation, as expected, resulted in increased expression of MHC, adhesion, and costimulatory molecules, and generated brisk allogeneic lymphocyte reactions. Retroviral-mediated expression of CD80 in carcinoma cells, with or without CD40 activation, triggered mixed lymphocyte reactions, provided cells were treated with IFN-gamma. Thus, the cell surface phenotype induced on carcinoma cells following CD40 activation is not fully capable of inducing T cell proliferation; however, these results support ongoing efforts to exploit costimulation in clinical efforts aimed at increasing carcinoma immunogenicity.

Retinoic acid-induced blr1 expression requires RARalpha, RXR, and MAPK activation and uses ERK2 but not JNK/SAPK to accelerate cell differentiation.

Upstream signaling requirements of retinoic acid (RA)-induced blr1 expression and downstream signaling consequences of blr1 over-expression in a human myeloid leukemia cell line demonstrate that mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling complexes are involved in both avenues. RA-induced myeloid differentiation and G1/G0 growth arrest of HL-60 cells is known to require the activation of the RARalpha and RXR retinoid receptors, as well as activation of the MAPK, ERK2. Transcriptional activation of the Burkitt's lymphoma receptor 1 (blr1) gene occurs early during RA-induced differentiation of HL-60 cells and requires these same three activating processes. The use of retinoid ligands that activate either the RARalpha or the RXR retinoid receptors revealed that blr1 mRNA induction was detectable only when both RARalpha and RXR were activated. Neither the RARalpha nor RXR selective ligands alone induced expression of blr1, but the combination of the two ligands induced the expression of blr1 to the same extent as RA. The MAPKK (MEK) inhibitor, PD98059, was used to determine whether extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK2) activation was necessary for induction of blr1 mRNA. PD98059 inhibited induced blr1 mRNA expression, due to RA or activated RARalpha plus RXR ligands, indicating that ERK2 activation is necessary for blr1 mRNA expression. Previous studies showed that ectopic expression of blr1 also caused increased MAPK activation, in particular ERK2, and subsequently accelerated RA-induced differentiation and G1/G0 growth arrest. Inhibition of ERK2 activation inhibited differentiation of blr1 transfectants, suggesting that the accelerated differentiation reflected blr1-enhanced ERK2 activation. The present data also demonstrate that ectopic expression of blr1 increased JNK/SAPK activity, but JNK/ SAPK activation was not needed for accelerated RA-induced differentiation and growth arrest. The results show that the signals known to be required for HL-60 differentiation, activated RARalpha, RXR, and ERK2, are necessary for blr1 mRNA expression. Downstream consequences of blr1 overexpression include enhanced MAPK signaling.

Retinoic acid-induced blr1 expression promotes ERK2 activation and cell differentiation in HL-60 cells.

Retinoids are known to induce the differentiation and cell cycle arrest of human myeloid leukemia cells in vitro. Differential display was used to identify putative early regulatory genes that are differentially expressed in HL-60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells treated with retinoic acid. One of the cDNAs cloned encodes sequences identifying Burkitt's lymphoma receptor 1 (BLR1), a recently described chemokine receptor. Northern blot analysis demonstrates that blr1 mRNA expression increases within 9 h of retinoic acid treatment, well before functional differentiation or G(1)/G(0) growth arrest at 48 h or onset of morphological changes, suggesting a possible regulatory function. The expression of blr1 mRNA is transient, peaking at 72 h when cells are differentiated. blr1 mRNA also is induced by other differentiation-inducing agents, 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) and DMSO. Induction of blr1 mRNA by retinoic acid is not blocked by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. In HL-60 cells stably transfected with blr1 cDNA, ectopic expression of blr1 causes an increase in ERK2 MAPK activation and promotes retinoic acid-induced G(1)/G(0) growth arrest and cell differentiation. The early expression of blr1 mRNA during differentiation, its ability to increase ERK2 activation, and its enhancement of retinoic acid-induced differentiation suggest that blr1 expression may be involved in retinoic acid-induced HL-60 differentiation.