ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to compare the results of 8-years experience of endovascular treatment (ET) of popliteal aneurysms (PAs) using the Hemobahn/Viabahn endograft with those achieved with open repair (OR). Endpoints were primary and secondary patency rate. METHODS: The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial from January 1999 to December 2003 and a prospective comparative study from January 2004 to December 2006. Patients with an asymptomatic aneurismal lesion in the popliteal artery 2 cm at angio-computed tomography were included in the study. Indication for ET was PA (proximal and distal neck length >1 cm); contraindications were: 1) age <50 years; 2) poor distal run-off; 3) contraindication to antiplatelet, anticoagulant or thrombolytic therapy. RESULTS: Between January 1999 and December 2006, of a total of 42 patients with 48 PA, 27 were treated with OR (group A) and 21 with ET (group B). The primary patency rate was 100% in group A and 80.9% in group B at 12 months and 71.4% and 88.1%, respectively, at 72 months; the secondary patency rate at 72 months was 88.15% and 85.9% in groups A and B, respectively. No statistical differences were observed at the log-rank test. During the entire study period, 3 (14.3%) patients in group B required conversion to open surgery because of endograft occlusion. CONCLUSION: Within the power limitations of this study, ET for asymptomatic PA in patients with suitable anatomy can be considered safe, with long-term results comparable with those of OR.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Saphenous Vein/transplantation , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aneurysm/diagnosis , Aneurysm/physiopathology , Angiography, Digital Subtraction , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Polytetrafluoroethylene , Popliteal Artery/pathology , Popliteal Artery/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Radiography, Interventional , Stents , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex , Vascular Patency , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effectsABSTRACT
AIM: The risk for developing stroke increases with the advancing age, peaking over age 80. In elderly patients, carotid endarterectomy may provide prophylaxis against stroke. Aim of our study was to compare patients 80 years or older with patients younger than 80 undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Endpoints were perioperative mortality and morbidity. METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2002, 1 659 patients underwent a 1 733 carotid endarterectomy for a symptomatic or asymptomatic significant carotid lesion. Among them, 125 patients were 80 years or older. We analyzed death and stroke rate from cerebrovascular accidents, TIA as well as non cerebrovascular complications and death rate postoperatively and in the long term follow-up. The Pearson's chi-squared(2) test was used for the statistical analysis on risk factors, morbidity and mortality. The Log rank test was used for cumulative stroke-free and survival rates between the 2 groups (level of confidence p<0.05). RESULTS: Risk factors were similar in both groups. No statistical difference was observed in the stroke, TIA, mortality and stroke free rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that perioperative and postoperative mortality and morbidity as well as the long-term stroke-free rate does not differ significantly in patients 80 years or older compared to patients younger than 80 undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
