Arthroscopic treatment of diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the elbow.

INTRODUCTION: Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) is a rare pathology of the elbow, but presents a risk of progression with cartilage destruction. Surgical treatment consists in synovectomy, as complete as possible. Arthroscopy is an excellent tool for the exploration and treatment of intra-articular lesions in the elbow, but the results in PVNS of the elbow have never been evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the recurrence rate of PVNS of the elbow after arthroscopic synovectomy, and secondarily to assess pain, joint range of motion, functional scores and complication rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of a continuous series of 8 patients operated on between February 2012 and February 2019, with a mean age of 43.7 years. The operated side was the dominant side in 75% of cases. Surgery consisted in the most complete synovectomy possible, performed arthroscopically. Recurrence, clinical evaluation, with pain at rest and on mpvement on visual analogue scale (VAS) and joint range of motion, functional MEPS and DASH scores, and any complications were collected. RESULTS: At a mean 66.4 months' follow-up, 2 patients required revision surgery for recurrence. At the last follow-up, VAS for pain at rest was 0.9 and 1.9 for pain on movement. MEPS score was 85.6 and DASH score 82.2. No neurological, vascular or infectious complications of arthroscopic synovectomy were found in our series. DISCUSSION: Arthroscopic synovectomy in the treatment of PVNS of the elbow was a reliable and safe therapeutic alternative, with a low complications rate and 2 cases of recurrence (25%) in our study. This was the first study to report the results of arthroscopic surgical treatment of elbow PVNS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Retrospective study without control group.

Tibial pilon fractures treated with a periarticular external fixator: Retrospective study of 47 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial pilon fractures are a treatment challenge, since there is no true gold standard treatment, and because of potential skin complications. Periarticular external fixation (PAEF) appears to produce good results, but the outcomes with the TL-HEX Trauma™ (Orthofix®, Verona, Italy) have not yet been evaluated. We performed a study with the following objectives: 1) evaluate time to union and union rate; 2) determine clinical and radiological results; 3) detect complications. HYPOTHESIS: PAEF will produce comparable fracture union to other external fixator techniques for tibial pilon fractures. METHODS: A single center, retrospective study, was done between June 2016 and December 2018. Patients who had a tibial pilon fracture operated with a PAEF were included if they had a minimum of 12 months' follow-up. Forty-seven patients were included; the mean follow-up was 2.45 years (1.2-3.7). The primary endpoint was the time to union and union rate at the final assessment. The secondary endpoints were the joint range of motion, residual pain (VAS), functional scores (AOFAS and SF12) and complication rate. RESULTS: The union rate was 70% (33/47) and the mean time to union was 201±79 days (89-369). The range of motion was significantly reduced relative to the contralateral side. Twenty patients had residual pain that averaged 2.9 (1-6) on the VAS. The mean AOFAS score was 74 points (51-95). Twenty patients (43%) suffered at least one complication. DISCUSSION: While a PAEF helps to avoid skin complications, in our study, it was associated with a lower union rate and longer time to union than in other published studies. This difference is likely due to a higher rate of open fractures and high-energy trauma in our study, different protocol for return to weightbearing and a different external fixator than other studies. This is the first study reporting the results of the TL-HEX Trauma in this indication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.