O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine: uptake mechanisms and clinical applications.

O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) is a promising tracer for PET that has demonstrated convincing results especially in the diagnostics of brain tumors. In contrast to other radiolabeled amino acids, it can be produced with high efficiency and distributed in a satellite concept like the widely used 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Although FET is not incorporated into proteins, it shows high uptake in cerebral gliomas and in extracranial squamous cell carcinomas owing to increased transport. The tracer exhibits high in vivo stability, low uptake in inflammatory tissue and suitable uptake kinetics for clinical imaging, which indicates that it may become a new standard tracer for PET. In this article, the present knowledge on the uptake mechanisms and the clinical applications of FET are reviewed and the clinical perspectives are discussed.

18F-FET PET compared with 18F-FDG PET and CT in patients with head and neck cancer.

UNLABELLED: Recent studies suggest a somewhat selective uptake of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) in cerebral gliomas and in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and a good distinction between tumor and inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of 18F-FET PET in patients with SCC of the head and neck region by comparing that tracer with 18F-FDG PET and CT. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with suspected head and neck tumors underwent 18F-FET PET, 18F-FDG PET, and CT within 1 wk before operation. After coregistration, the images were evaluated by 3 independent observers and an ROC analysis was performed, with the histopathologic result used as a reference. Furthermore, the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) in the lesions were determined. RESULTS: In 18 of 21 patients, histologic examination revealed SCC, and in 2 of these patients, a second SCC tumor was found at a different anatomic site. In 3 of 21 patients, inflammatory tissue and no tumor were identified. Eighteen of 20 SCC tumors were positive for both 18F-FDG uptake and 18F-FET uptake, one 0.3-cm SCC tumor was detected neither with 18F-FDG PET nor with 18F-FET PET, and one 0.7-cm SCC tumor in a 4.3-cm ulcer was overestimated as a 4-cm tumor on 18F-FDG PET and missed on 18F-FET PET. Inflammatory tissue was positive for 18F-FDG uptake (SUV, 3.7-4.7) but negative for 18F-FET uptake (SUV, 1.3-1.6). The SUVs of 18F-FDG in SCC were significantly higher (13.0 +/- 9.3) than those of 18F-FET (4.4 +/- 2.2). The ROC analysis showed significantly superior detection of SCC with (18)F-FET PET or 18F-FDG PET than with CT. No significant difference (P = 0.71) was found between 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FET PET. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET was 93%, specificity was 79%, and accuracy was 83%. 18F-FET PET yielded a lower sensitivity of 75% but a substantially higher specificity of 95% (accuracy, 90%). CONCLUSION: 18F-FET may not replace 18F-FDG in the PET diagnostics of head and neck cancer but may be a helpful additional tool in selected patients, because 18F-FET PET might better differentiate tumor tissue from inflammatory tissue. The sensitivity of 18F-FET PET in SCC, however, was inferior to that of 18F-FDG PET because of lower SUVs.

Physical and functional interactions of the cytomegalovirus US6 glycoprotein with the transporter associated with antigen processing.

The endoplasmic reticulum-resident human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein US6 (gpUS6) inhibits peptide translocation by the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) to prevent loading of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules and antigen presentation to CD8+ T cells. TAP is formed by two subunits, TAP1 and TAP2, each containing one multispanning transmembrane domain (TMD) and a cytosolic nucleotide binding domain. Here we reported that the blockade of TAP by gpUS6 is species-restricted, i.e. gpUS6 inhibits human TAP but not rat TAP. Co-expression of human and rat subunits of TAP demonstrates independent binding of gpUS6 to human TAP1 and TAP2, whereas gpUS6 does not bind to rat TAP subunits. gpUS6 associates with preformed TAP1/2 heterodimers but not with unassembled TAP subunits. To locate domains of TAP required for gpUS6 binding and function, we took advantage of reciprocal human/rat intrachain TAP chimeras. Each TAP subunit forms two contact sites within its TMD interacting with gpUS6. The dominant gpUS6-binding site on TAP2 maps to an N-terminal loop, whereas inhibition of peptide transport is mediated by a C-terminal loop of the TMD. For TAP1, two gpUS6 binding domains are formed by loops of the C-terminal TMD. The domain required for TAP inactivation is built by a distal loop of the C-terminal TMD, indicating a topology of TAP1 comprising 10 endoplasmic reticulum transmembrane segments. By forming multimeric complexes, gpUS6 reaches the distant target domains to arrest peptide transport. The data revealed a nonanalogous multipolar bridging of the TAP TMDs by gpUS6.

Preferred stereoselective brain uptake of d-serine--a modulator of glutamatergic neurotransmission.

Although it has long been presumed that d-amino acids are uncommon in mammalians, substantial amounts of free d-serine have been detected in the mammalian brain. d-Serine has been demonstrated to be an important modulator of glutamatergic neurotransmission and acts as an agonist at the strychnine-insensitive glycine site of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors. The blood-to-brain transfer of d-serine is thought to be extremely low, and it is assumed that d-serine is generated by isomerization of l-serine in the brain. Stimulated by the observation of a preferred transport of the d-isomer of proline at the blood-brain barrier, we investigated the differential uptake of [3H]-d-serine and [3H]-l-serine in the rat brain 1 h after intravenous injection using quantitative autoradiography. Surprisingly, brain uptake of [3H]-d-serine was significantly higher than that of [3H]-l-serine, indicating a preferred transport of the d-enantiomer of serine at the blood-brain barrier. This finding indicates that exogenous d-serine may have a direct influence on glutamatergic neurotransmission and associated diseases.

Preferred stereoselective transport of the D-isomer of cis-4-[18F]fluoro-proline at the blood-brain barrier.

Generally, L-amino acids are preferably transported into mammalian cells compared with their D-isomers, and only L-amino acids are incorporated into proteins. Former studies, however, indicated that D-[H]proline is accumulated in the brain of mice after injection, while L-[3H]proline is not. We investigated the differential cerebral uptake of the D- and L-isomers of the PET tracer cis-4-[18F]fluoroproline (D-/L-cis-FPro) and of D-/L-[3H]proline (D-/L-Pro) in rats by dual tracer autoradiography and the uptake of D-cis-FPro in two human subjects by PET. The standardized uptake value (SUV) of D-cis-FPro in the cerebral cortex of rats 2 h p.i. was 3.05+/-1.18 (n=9) versus 0.06+/-0.01 (n=4) for L-cis-FPro (P<0.001) and 1.29+/-0.27 (n=4) for D-Pro versus 0.30+/-0.14 (n=9) for L-Pro (P<0.001). Analysis of the rat brain tissue after injection of D-cis-FPro (n=3) revealed no radioactivity in the proteins but a relevant part in the form of L-trans-FPro. The PET studies yielded a four- to five-fold higher SUV and influx rate constant in the human cortex for D-cis-FPro than for L-cis-FPro. We conclude that D-cis-FPro and D-Pro are preferably transported at the blood-brain barrier compared with their L-isomers and isomerized to the L-form within the brain. Thus, D-Pro in the plasma might be a source of intracerebral L-proline, which has been shown to act as a modulator of excitatory neurotransmission.

PET with O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine in peripheral tumors: first clinical results.

UNLABELLED: O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine (18F-FET) PET has shown promising results in brain tumor diagnosis. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate 18F-FET PET in comparison with 18F-FDG PET in patients with peripheral tumors. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with suspected malignant tumors underwent 18F-FET PET and 18F-FDG PET within 7 d. Whole-body PET studies were performed 1 h after intravenous injection of 370 MBq of 18F-FET or 18F-FDG. Six patients were excluded from the analysis because a malignant tumor could not be verified. In 38 patients (7 with colorectal cancer, 6 with pancreatic cancer, 9 with head-neck cancer, 4 with lymphomas, 3 with lung cancer, 3 with ovarian cancer, 4 with breast cancer, and 2 with prostatic cancer), 18F-FET PET and 18F-FDG PET were compared. RESULTS: 18F-FET was positive in only 13 of 38 patients (8 with head-neck cancer, 3 with breast cancer, and 2 with lung cancer), whereas 18F-FDG exhibited increased uptake in 37 of 38 patients. All squamous cell carcinomas were found to be 18F-FET-positive tumors (8 head-neck cancer and 2 lung cancer), whereas most adenocarcinomas were found to be 18F-FET-negative tumors. In patients with colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, prostatic cancer, and lymphomas, no increased 18F-FET uptake could be identified. All lesions that exhibited increased 18F-FET uptake also showed increased 18F-FDG uptake. No additional lesion was identified by 18F-FET PET but not by 18F-FDG PET. A subgroup analysis of patients with head-neck carcinomas allowed a better distinction between malignant and inflammatory tissues with 18F-FET than with 18F-FDG. CONCLUSION: 18F-FET is inferior to 18F-FDG as a PET tracer for general tumor diagnosis. Our preliminary results suggest rather selective uptake of 18F-FET in squamous cell carcinomas. Compared with 18F-FDG PET, 18F-FET PET may allow a better distinction between tumors and inflammatory tissues in patients with squamous cell carcinomas.