ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the incidence and surgical outcomes of patients with native infective endocarditis (IE) and prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis (PVE) over the past decade at a single institution. METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2015, 289 patients (mean age, 63.3 ± 14.2 years) suffering from native IE (n = 186) and PVE (n = 103) of the aortic valve underwent surgical procedures. Perioperative data were acquired retrospectively for statistical analysis. RESULTS: During the study period the mean incidence of endocarditis increased from 22.0 ± 4.2 (2005-2009) to 29.8 ± 10.1 (2010-2015) cases per year. In-hospital mortality was significantly increased in PVE (22.3%) versus IE (9.1%) patients (P < .001). In elective cases in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups was comparable (2.2% vs 4.6%; P = .288). Multivariate analysis identified urgent surgery (odds ratio [OR], 6.461; 95% CI, 1.941-21.509; P = .002), mitral regurgitation II (OR, 4.230; 95% CI, 1.249-14.331; P = .021), previous homograft operation (OR, 66.096; 95% CI, 2.369-1844.272; P = .0.14), and left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% (OR, 8.267; 95% CI, 1.931-35.388; P = .004) as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality, whereas pathogen identification by preoperative blood cultures (OR, .228; 95% CI, 0.063-0.817; P = .023) was found to be independently protective. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for native IE and PVE of the aortic valve may be performed with satisfactorily results at experienced cardiac surgical centers. In comparison PVE patients suffer from a more than twice as high in-hospital mortality, more postoperative complications, and inferior long-term survival. However preoperative identification of causative pathogens in IE and PVE allows for improved in-hospital survival.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve/surgery , Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Emergencies , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity/trends , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Propensity Score , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Heart rate and blood pressure variability as well as baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) lead to additional insights on the patients' prognosis after cardiovascular events. The following study was performed to assess the differences in the postoperative recovery of the autonomic regulation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Fifty-eight consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective study; 24 underwent TAVI and 34 SAVR. BRS was calculated according to the Dual Sequence Method, heart rate variability (HRV) was evaluated using standard linear as well as nonlinear parameters. HRV and BRS parameters were reduced after surgery in patients with SAVR only (meanNN: p<0.001, sdNN: p<0.05, Shannon: p<0.01, BRS: p<0.01), while these indexes were preserved in patients after TAVI. Simultaneously, an increased complexity of blood pressure (BP) in SAVR patients (fwShannon: p<0.001, fwRenyi4: p<0.001), but not in TAVI patients was recorded. In this study we were able to demonstrate for the first time that, in contrast to patients undergoing conventional open surgery, there are fewer alterations of the cardiovascular autonomic system in patients with TAVI.
