Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37045689

ABSTRACT

High rates of multiple implantation after assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment represent one of the major problems for both mothers and their fetuses. Given the availability of techniques intended to identify embryos with the highest chance for development to term, such as comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) and blastocyst transfer, the decision on the number of embryos to transfer deserves careful consideration. This report presents real-life data from two clinics using the Fischer protocol for cycle programming in patients undergoing ART. Our data indicate that ovarian stimulation using the Fischer protocol provides consistent and optimal ART outcomes in centers following strict quality management standards. However, high multiple implantation rates were observed in fresh and frozen transfer cycles after transferring two embryos - even in patients aged over 39 years. The live birth rates after CCS were superior to those using untested embryos. These findings were held for the three age groups irrespective of the CCS culture day (D1 = PN stages, or D5 = blastocysts). Our results support a single embryo transfer policy, particularly in women under 34 years of age with favorable conditions during ART treatment, i.e., a high number of available fertilized oocytes.


Subject(s)
Embryo Transfer , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Female , Humans , Embryo Transfer/methods , Embryo Implantation/physiology , Single Embryo Transfer , Chromosomes
4.
Panminerva Med ; 61(1): 11-23, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30674180

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ovarian stimulation (OS) is crucial for pregnancy success in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments. The possibility of programming the OS cycle and oocyte pick-up (OPU) is advantageous to Fertility Centers operating under quality management systems (QMS) as it might increase efficiency and safety. Moreover, cycle programming is patient-centered as it might help IVF patients to most optimally manage domestic and work commitments. In this study, we describe the so-called "Fischer protocol" to IVF cycle programming and present the clinical results of using this approach in two independent Fertility Centers certified according to DIN EN ISO 9001 standards. METHODS: Cycle programming was achieved in normo-ovulatory women with pretreatment administration of norethisterone acetate, followed by OS using individualized doses of recombinant human FSH and recombinant human LH in a fixed 2:1 ratio in association with a flexible GnRH antagonist regimen. The final oocyte maturation was attained with use of GnRH agonist trigger. The oocyte pick-ups (OPU) were scheduled approximately 40 days ahead of the programed OPU date. The cycle outcomes of 647 patients treated using the "Fischer protocol" in the Center where the method was developed (study center 1) are presented. The model was then tested at an independent Fertility Center (study center 2), and the first clinical results using the Fischer protocol in 216 patients are presented and compared with that of 516 patients undergoing conventional OS without cycle programming. RESULTS: The duration of ovarian stimulation was 9±1 day in all treated patients. No OPU was scheduled during weekends or had to be re-scheduled due to issues related to cycle programming. In the study center 1, the highest and lowest mean number of oocytes retrieved was 11.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-22.1) in patients of ≤30 years and 7.7 (95% CI: 1-19) in those aged 40 years and over. No cases of OHSS were recorded in this series. The mean number of embryos transferred was 1.5 and the overall clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) were 52.7% and 43.5%, respectively. In the study center 2, patients treated using the Fisher protocol achieved statistically higher oocyte output rate (94.6% vs. 85.0%), number of oocytes retrieved (9.8±7.7 vs. 7.9±7.2), and blastulation rates (55.1% vs. 49.4%) than those treated using conventional OS. The CPR (50.6% vs. 41.1%) and LBR (44.7% vs. 33.2%) also favored the group of patients subjected to cycle programming using the Fisher protocol, although this data mainly resulted from the increased frequency of patients subjected to preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). CONCLUSIONS: An optimal distribution of both clinical and laboratory workload was achieved by using the Fischer protocol. Moreover, oocyte pick-ups were eliminated on weekends and holidays without jeopardizing the quality of care provided to couples. The Fischer protocol is consistent with the quality management philosophy and focusses on improving the quality of care by increasing safety, efficacy, and patient-centeredness without harming treatment effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Oocytes/cytology , Ovulation Induction/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standards , Adult , Blastula/metabolism , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Fertilization in Vitro/standards , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/administration & dosage , Humans , Luteal Phase , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Norethindrone Acetate/administration & dosage , Patient-Centered Care , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Preimplantation Diagnosis , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage
5.
Hum Reprod ; 28(4): 969-78, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23340056

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Could the protamine-1 to protamine-2 mRNA ratio serve as a biomarker to estimate the fertilizing capacity of sperm from men taking part in an IVF/ICSI programme? SUMMARY ANSWER: The protamine mRNA ratio clearly discriminates between fertile and subfertile men and sperm with a normal protamine mRNA ratio exhibit a higher fertilizing capacity in IVF/ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Aberrant sperm protamine ratios are associated with male factor infertility and mRNA ratio is comparable with protein ratio (due to transcriptional stop in elongating spermatids). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study population was drawn from subfertile men, whose female partners participated in IVF or ICSI programmes between September 2010 and February 2012. Normozoospermic healthy volunteers served as controls. Sperm cells were lysed, mRNA extracted, reverse transcribed and subjected to real-time quantitative PCR using specific primer pairs for protamine-1 and protamine-2. Relative protamine-1 and protamine-2 mRNA levels were analysed with the Mann-Whitney U-test (two-tailed). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Quantitative RT-PCR for protamines 1 and 2 has been performed in ejaculates from 32 normozoospermic volunteers (control, University Clinic Giessen, Germany) and 306 patients, whose female partners took part in an IVF (n = 76; University Clinic Hamburg, Germany and Shanghai Jiaotong University, China) or an ICSI (n = 230; University Clinic Munich, Germany and Kinderwunschzentrum Wiesbaden, Germany) programme. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The sperm protamine mRNA ratio in normozoospermic men (0.98 ± 0.3) differed significantly from that of ICSI patients (Munich 0.81 ± 0.1; Wiesbaden 0.78 ± 0.2; P < 0.001), while processed samples obtained from IVF patients revealed a normal protamine mRNA ratio (Hamburg 1.0 ± 0.07; Shanghai 1.0 ± 0.54). Normal protamine mRNA ratios were associated with a significantly higher total motile sperm count and a significantly higher percentage of progressively motile sperm. Sperm with a normal protamine mRNA ratio revealed a higher fertilization capacity (fc) in both IVF (53.6% of patients with fc > 80%; P = 0.017) and ICSI (65.1% of patients with fc > 70%; P = 0.028). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The protamine mRNA ratio in an individual sperm cell used for ICSI may be different from the overall value obtained from a semen aliquot. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Data are in line with current literature and suggest the protamine mRNA ratio as a diagnostic marker to estimate the fertilizing capacity of sperm. STUDY FUNDING: The German Research Foundation (DFG) to K.S., W.W. and A.P. (STE 892/9-2), as well as to A.S. and H.C.O. (SP721/1-3). COMPETING INTEREST(S): None.


Subject(s)
Fertilization/physiology , Protamines/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Spermatozoa/metabolism , Adult , Biomarkers/metabolism , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Infertility, Male/genetics , Infertility, Male/metabolism , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate , Protamines/genetics , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Sperm-Ovum Interactions
6.
Fertil Steril ; 97(4): 935-42, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22326608

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of intra-age and intercycle variations in the frequency of first polar body aneuploidy in two consecutive cycles of oocyte retrieval undertaken by the same patient within 1 year. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Fertility centers. PATIENT(S): Infertile couples undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent two consecutive cycles of preimplantation genetic screening through first polar body biopsy within 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Meiosis I aneuploidy. RESULT(S): A total of 226 patients underwent 452 cycles of preimplantation genetic screening. Differences within age groups were wide, with 0-100% of oocytes being chromosomally normal in all age groups. Euploidy rates between centers were significantly different (48% vs. 25%). Intercycle differences for the same patient were also wide (0-100%), but with 68.5% of patients having less than ±2 euploid eggs of difference between cycles. CONCLUSION(S): Although euploidy rate decreased on average with advancing maternal age, the high intra-age and intercenter variation in oocyte chromosome abnormalities emphasize the difficulty in estimating how many euploid oocytes a specific woman will have. This may have repercussions for fertility preservation where a defined number of eggs are currently frozen just based on maternal age.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosomes, Human , Fertility Agents, Female/adverse effects , Infertility/therapy , Oocytes/drug effects , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation/drug effects , Adult , Age Factors , Aneuploidy , Biopsy , Cryopreservation , Female , Genetic Testing , Germany , Health Facilities , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Infertility/physiopathology , Italy , Linear Models , Meiosis , Middle Aged , Oocytes/pathology , Polar Bodies/drug effects , Polar Bodies/pathology , Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
7.
Mol Hum Reprod ; 17(11): 669-78, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21593214

ABSTRACT

Human spermatozoal RNA features special characteristics such as a significantly reduced quantity within spermatozoa compared with somatic cells is described as being devoid of ribosomal RNAs and is difficult to isolate due to a massive excess of genomic DNA in the lysates. Using a novel two-round column-based protocol for human ejaculates delivering highly purified spermatozoal RNA, we uncovered a heterogeneous, but specific banding pattern in microelectrophoresis with 28S ribosomal RNA being indicative for the amount of round cell contamination. Ejaculates with different round cell quantities and density-purified spermatozoa revealed that 18S rRNA but not 28S rRNA is inherent to a pure spermatozoal fraction. Transmission electron microscopy showed monoribosomes and polyribosomes in spermatozoal cytoplasm, while immunohistochemical results suggest the presence of proteins from small and large ribosomal subunits in retained spermatozoal cytoplasm irrespective of 28S rRNA absence.


Subject(s)
RNA, Ribosomal, 18S/chemistry , RNA, Ribosomal, 28S/chemistry , Ribosomes/metabolism , Spermatozoa/chemistry , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Ribosomal, 18S/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 28S/genetics
8.
Fertil Steril ; 84(6): 1786-8, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16359993

ABSTRACT

Although many IVF centers have implemented a Quality Management System, staff management in the IVF laboratory is still highly neglected. This article describes methods for staff development and monitoring of staff performance in the IVF laboratory.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Control , Reproductive Medicine/standards , Staff Development/methods , Clinical Competence , Humans , Laboratories/organization & administration , Laboratories/standards , Reproductive Medicine/organization & administration , Staff Development/standards , Workforce
9.
Hum Reprod ; 17(7): 1788-94, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12093841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Isolation of sperm suitable for ICSI from fresh or frozen-thawed testicular sperm extraction (TESE) can be facilitated by mechanical or enzymatic processing of the samples. METHODS: A retrospective multicentre study was initiated to compare these two approaches. Eleven German centres provided data on their TESE cycles performed during the period 1996/1997. Quality of retrieved sperm, fertilization rates of injected oocytes, embryo quality, resulting pregnancy rates and evolution of pregnancies were evaluated. RESULTS: The percentage of cycles with at least some motile sperm available for injection was higher after mechanical preparation. Independent of the preparation method, fertilization rates were higher for motile compared with immotile sperm or elongated spermatids in all groups and in general higher for cryopreserved versus fresh samples. Embryo quality was significantly better after injection of motile sperm for all treatments and in particular after enzymatic versus mechanical processing of biopsies. Pregnancy rates were identical for embryos derived from sperm prepared mechanically or enzymatically from fresh or cryopreserved testicular samples. The abortion rate (32/172, 18.6%) and the rate of multiple implantations (32/140, 22.9%) were not different from results reported in the literature for ICSI using ejaculated sperm. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective multicentre study, no unequivocal advantage of one over the other preparation method could be identified in 839 ICSI cycles using testicular sperm from 549 patients.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/methods , Infertility, Male/therapy , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Spermatozoa , Testis/pathology , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Adult , Cryopreservation , Embryo, Mammalian/physiology , Enzymes , Female , Fertilization , Histocytological Preparation Techniques , Humans , Incidence , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate , Pregnancy, Multiple/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sperm Motility , Spermatids/physiology , Spermatozoa/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...