Prognostic factors of local control and progression-free survival in AJCC stages T1 and T2 cervical cancer patients treated with adjuvant brachytherapy after chemoradiotherapy.

Purpose: We assessed prognostic factors of local control and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated for AJCC stages T1 and T2 cervical cancer using utero-vaginal brachytherapy after chemoradiotherapy. Material and methods: This retrospective single-institution analysis included patients who underwent brachytherapy after radiochemotherapy between 2005 and 2015 at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine. Adjuvant hysterectomy was optional. A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was carried out. Results: Of 218 patients, 81 (37.2%) were AJCC stage T1, and 137 (62.8%) were AJCC stage T2. 167 (76.6%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma, 97 (44.5%) patients had pelvic nodal disease, and 30 (13.8%) patients had para-aortic nodal disease. One hundred eighty-four patients (84.4%) underwent concomitant chemotherapy, while adjuvant surgery was performed in 91 patients (41.9%) and 42 (46.2%) patients had pathological complete response. Median follow-up was 4.2 years, and local control was reported in 87.8% (95% CI: 83.0-91.8) and 87.2% (95% CI: 82.3-91.3) of patients at 2 and 5 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, T stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.65, 95% CI: 1.27-10.46, p = 0.016) was associated with local control. PFS was reported in 67.6% (95% CI: 60.9-73.4) and 57.4% (95% CI: 49.3-64.2) of patients at 2 and 5 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, para-aortic nodal disease (HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.16-3.54, p = 0.012), pathological complete response (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.73, p = 0.006), and intermediate-risk clinical tumor volume of > 60 cc (HR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.22-2.98, p = 0.005) were associated with PFS. Conclusions: Lower dose brachytherapy may benefit AJCC stages T1 and T2 tumors, whereas higher doses are required for larger tumors and para-aortic nodal disease involvement, respectively. Pathological complete response should be associated with better local control and not surgery.

Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Patients with Extracranial Chondrosarcoma: A Joint Study of the French Sarcoma Group and Rare Cancer Network.

PURPOSE: Postoperative radiation therapy (poRT) of intracranial/skull base chondrosarcomas (CHSs) is standard treatment. However, consensus is lacking for poRT in extracranial CHS (eCHS) owing to their easier resectability and intrinsic radioresistance. We assessed the practice and efficacy of poRT in eCHS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This multicentric retrospective study of the French Sarcoma Group/Rare Cancer Network included patients with eCHS who were operated on between 1985 and 2015. Inverse propensity score weighting (IPTW) was used to minimize poRT allocation biases. RESULTS: Of 182 patients, 60.4% had bone and 39.6% had soft-tissue eCHS. eCHS were of conventional (31.9%), myxoid (28.6%; 41 extraskeletal, 11 skeletal), mesenchymal (9.9%), or other subtypes. En-bloc surgery with complete resection was performed in 52.6% and poRT in 36.8% of patients (median dose, 54 Gy). Irradiated patients had unfavorable initial characteristics, with higher grade and incomplete resection. Median follow-up time was 61 months. Five-year incidence of local relapse was 10% with poRT versus 21.6% without (P = .050). Using the IPTW method, poRT reduced the local relapse risk (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.52; P < .001). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 71.8% with poRT and 64.2% without (P = .680). Using the IPTW method, poRT improved DFS (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.85; P = .010). The benefit of poRT on local relapse and DFS was confirmed after exclusion of the extraskeletal subtype. There was no difference in overall survival. Prognostic factors of poorer DFS in multivariate analysis were deeper location, higher grade, incomplete resection, and no poRT. CONCLUSIONS: poRT should be offered in patients with eCHS and high-grade or incomplete resection, regardless of the histologic subtype.

[Recourse of patients to their general practitioner in unplanned hospitalization in oncology management: A prospective study in an oncology institute]. / Recours des patients à leur médecin généraliste en situation d'hospitalisation non planifiée dans la prise en charge oncologique : étude prospective dans un institut de cancérologie.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer management is a public health issue in France. Its incidence is stabilizing even decreasing, but the prevalence increases. Public policies give at the general practitioner (GP) a central role in oncological care: it must be present at all stages of the disease, from screening to post-cancer. METHODS: One-year prospective monocentric study in a cancer institute. Distribution of a questionnaire to unplanned hospitalized patients and collection of socio-demographic and medical data in their files. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of the study patients did not consult their GP for the health problem that motivated hospitalization. Sixty-nine percent of patients surveyed believe that GP is not the primary care physician for the management of complications and adverse effects of oncology treatments. A large majority of patients have metastatic cancer while only 40 % followed by the support care team. DISCUSSION: GP's are not yet integrated into the active management of cancer for study patients. The symptoms that GP's say they can easily manage are the most frequent reasons for hospitalization.

Predictive factors of axillary positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in extended ductal carcinoma in situ treated by simple mastectomy at once.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) ranged from 0 to 14%. The main hypothesis would be the presence of an invasive contingent on the final histology. The objective was to identify predictive factors of sentinel lymph node positivity in the management of extended ductal carcinoma in situ treated by simple mastectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study carried out at the Lorraine Cancer Institute from January 2003 to December 2017. Women with DCIS on core-needle biopsy whose management consisted of simple mastectomy and SLNB procedure were included. RESULTS: 188 patients were analyzed. Preoperatively, 18 patients (9.6%) had DCIS with microinvasion, while the others had pure DCIS. Eight patients (4.2%) had positive sentinel lymph node biopsy, the majority of which were single micrometastases. Predictive factor of node invasion was microinvasion on biopsy (p<0.01). Only in cases of pure DCIS, the percentage of positive SLNB was reduced to 2.9%. Invasive carcinoma was found in the majority of patients with positive axillary SLNB procedure (75%, n=6), compared to 16.7% (n=30) without SLNB involvement (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of positive sentinel node biopsy in pure ductal carcinoma in situ suggests that in the absence of microinvasion, the sentinel procedure would seem less appropriate. New techniques for identifying sentinel lymph node biopsy could report axillary staging after definitive histologic results.